When searching a number....where to trust?

Phrasing's Avatar
So you decide to google a number and you get some hits...what do you trust or don't? Mobile version of eccie doesn't like search full numbers.
You have eroticmugshots, escortads.xxx, escortsintexas, bodyrublist, etc, that show pictures of the providers ads...some have the same and others have SEVERAL pictures of different girls. That's all fine.

My question is, can you trust sites like tosluts, TER, etc. I figure TER is legit like eccie, but not a member there...but the other BS looking sites...are they real or what?

I know there was a thread by Busternutzs and others who commented on how to really search, but this wasn't answered in there.
Don't trust them. Most of them shark information from other sites. So there is a level of reliability once-removed, even from BP.

That is, they are even less trustworthy than BP.
CryptKicker's Avatar
TER, Redbook, some things on EROS are usually pretty accurate. As you already know BP is more miss than hit. What makes sites like eroticmugshots, escortads.xxx, escortsintexas, bodyrublist, etc really bad is most of the times they pull the info from the questionable BP ads to begin with. TOSluts is a joke.
Thanks for the info ....I really need to get better at this ....good topic PHRASING ....what thread do you speak of that busta posted ....that helps with this subject???
busternutzs's Avatar
I posted my research thread in the men's lounge. It's does have some good info on research tips. I think at least part of those tips should be pasted to the sticky thread CK posted on how to research. Since it's posted in the ML I'm not sure if I can post the part I think should be added to CK's sticky thread.

I think TER is reliable for he most part. Sometimes at least the one review I paid to read the juicy details I thought to be bogus. It said the girl Tandi was a college girl and did anal. Both of which were false.Then I submitted a review which was truthful for another BP provider and it wasn't accepted. I was told it was found to be suspicious and not truthful.

The other sites which post a history of BP ads and pics only aid as a research tool to determine if the pics of the provider are her pics, fake or stolen and so forth. That's where as we all know the GIS and Tineye come in to play.

And Phrasing when you use ECCIE search if you search the last 4 digits of the cell in question it will reveal better results than if you search the whole 10 digit number. It will pull up or at least most of the time all numbers the with those four digits. That`s why its important when doing a request for intel it is important to always take the time to include the name and cell number for the provider in question.
Phrasing's Avatar
And Phrasing when you use ECCIE search if you search the last 4 digits of the cell in question it will reveal better results than if you search the whole 10 digit number. It will pull up or at least most of the time all numbers the with those four digits. That`s why its important when doing a request for intel it is important to always take the time to include the name and cell number for the provider in question. Originally Posted by busternutzs
Right, I do search for the last 4 digits....99% of the time you get a hit from someone though. Not always the girl you would be looking for. If it isn't in the area then I won't open the thread. You can see which provider it is linked too easily, but if it is in Kansas...odds are this aint the same woman
I need reviews or it is a no go.... tosluts is definitely a joke. Be careful!
I posted my research thread in the men's lounge. It's does have some good info on research tips. Since it's posted in the ML I'm not sure if I can post the part I think should be added to CK's sticky thread. Originally Posted by busternutzs

I think you are welcome to post what you want from YOUR post, i.e. create a new post here with YOUR information.
CryptKicker's Avatar
I think you are welcome to post what you want from YOUR post, i.e. create a new post here with YOUR information. Originally Posted by Wallance
Correct