Kurds say that ISIS is using chemical weapons now.

If this story stands up to scrutiny then we told you so. We warned about if ISIS got their hands on those chemical weapons that never existed after they existed. So now it looks like they got them and we still have 400 marines within spitting distance of ISIS. In fact, one just got wounded by a very near miss (fragments from a bullet impacting near his face).

I wish the left had been right about something especially those chemical weapons but as usual, they're not.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/worl...icle-1.2149739

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/american...nfire-in-iraq/

As Hillarious WILL SAY ...

... that is "OLD NEWS" ....

i think ISIS is using some of the "UNUSABLE" and "INEFFECTIVE" chemicals that were being "GUARDED" by Iraqi units to make sure that no one found out that there were ACTUALLY WMDs in Iraq, which were not found/destroyed/disclosed/or whatever.

Either that or the chemicals were taken in Syria where they were stockpiled (as originally suspected from the truck traffic in and out of Syria prior to the so called "ill-fated invasion of 2008" ... which explains why it was unnecessary for the Obaminable Administration to comply with its threat against Syria (the "line in the sand"), because the JV folks had already REMOVED THE CHIEMICALS to use in Iraq and the ISIS WAR.

Sarcasm Alert!!!!

If this story stands up to scrutiny then we told you so. We warned about if ISIS got their hands on those chemical weapons that never existed after they existed. So now it looks like they got them and we still have 400 marines within spitting distance of ISIS. In fact, one just got wounded by a very near miss (fragments from a bullet impacting near his face).

I wish the left had been right about something especially those chemical weapons but as usual, they're not.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/worl...icle-1.2149739

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/american...nfire-in-iraq/ Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

We have been through this with you already JD. This is the link you posted back in Oct. 2014. The only weapon systems found were corroded weapons from the 1980's that NO LONGER WORK.


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...pons.html?_r=1

This is from your link JD.

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.
After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.
Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.
All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.
In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

Did you have something to contribute? Life has moved on. The JV have become the local champions while you slept. Remember, denial is not just a river in Egypt.

Damn I was sure you had come up with evidence they had found Sarin gas.

Trying to rewrite history, again. Didn't work before. Won't work now. You wish the left had been correct? Yeah right

Don't you love JDIdiot's latest round of posts?

They start off with some outrageous claim and then go to something like; "If that's true, then shouldn't we hang OBAMA?"

I read somewhere that JDIdiot writes such outrageous bullshit because he's a recruiter for ISIS, tasked with infiltrating the hobby community and getting his fellow Idiots off their knees.

IF THATS TRUE, then why hasn't he been banned already?

See how it works. Told you so!

The only weapon systems found were corroded weapons from the 1980's that NO LONGER WORK. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Well that explains why the Iraqis had them guarded. They ....don't work!!!!

It also explains why the U.N. "inspectors" had them on the "to destroy" list

The "were corroded weapons from the 1980's that NO LONGER WORK."

Are you talking about these "weapon systems"?



or are you referencing this "weapon system"?

Well that explains why the Iraqis had them guarded. They ....don't work!!!!

It also explains why the U.N. "inspectors" had them on the "to destroy" list

The "were corroded weapons from the 1980's that NO LONGER WORK."

Are you talking about these "weapon systems"?


Originally Posted by LexusLover

MORON, why don't you talk to Mr. C. J. Chivers the author of the New York Times article in the link that was provided J.D. Barleycorn. Middle of the way down this is what he wrote. What don't you understand about filthy, rusted or corroded and could not have been used as designed? (that's another way of saying they don't work)

I would believe Mr. Chivers over any Bullsh%t you post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.
Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.
All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.
In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

Don't you love JDIdiot's latest round of posts?

They start off with some outrageous claim and then go to something like; "If that's true, then shouldn't we hang OBAMA?"

I read somewhere that JDIdiot writes such outrageous bullshit because he's a recruiter for ISIS, tasked with infiltrating the hobby community and getting his fellow Idiots off their knees.

IF THATS TRUE, then why hasn't he been banned already?

See how it works. Told you so!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yeah, in the the other thread he said that the Nazis didn't hate black people, just thought they were inferior. He's a fucking loon and if he really is a teacher, I pity the poor students who have their minds infected with his views.

Well that explains why the Iraqis had them guarded. They ....don't work!!!!

It also explains why the U.N. "inspectors" had them on the "to destroy" list

The "were corroded weapons from the 1980's that NO LONGER WORK."

Are you talking about these "weapon systems"?



or are you referencing this "weapon system"?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Damn lexie you got your ass kicked on those images once, are you going for seconds?

Considering what ISIS has done, and wants to do, is it supposed to be a big shock that they would use chemical weapons.

Be thankful they don't have a nuke.........yet.

*Pic Removed - JCM

[IMG]http://i9. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Watch it lama IB will turn you in for that "forbidden" subject.

Jackie, you're not paranoid, are you?

Don't turn around. Shhhhh!

Seriously, you think we need to send our troops to fight ISIS when there are more than a million troops already there who have ore at stake than your chickenshittedness?

WhY don't you and your war mongering pals just volunteer for the Syrian army and tell us how you did when you get back?