Is it fair that I'm skeptical of any review that starts with ...

"I've now seen this (Amazing, fantasy, atf) goddess 3 times now and just had to write a review"

I feel like a review of a girl that has been seen once is really helpful, but when it's a repeated visit, the review is from likely from someone who is more attached to the provider than to helping the client.

Just sayin.... maybe I am wrong?

I agree somewhat, but it also let's us know how the provider treats repeat clients

I agree somewhat, but it also let's us know how the provider treats repeat clients Originally Posted by joeschmoe90

True. I read here often that the service gets better the more often you see the lady.

Unfortunately, this excuse is also used as a ruse by the provider to get you to come back with hopes that the "next" visit will be more gfe.

My thinking is that reviews are mostly for a first time visitor to get an idea. The margin for error on a third or more visit makes those reviews basically wothless. YMMV becomes HUGE at that point.

Only if there is something that changed or increased....
Maybe she will allow bbbj after seeing someone twice
or IOP gets really really good after a few visits.
But if it is the same shit different day...then it is useless.
However, maybe I WK sometimes...but if I haven't seen a provider been mentioned in a while and I see them....whether it was my 5th time...I will review them

I agree with that. The level of service may change after a given time. Good or bad

I think repeat reviews by the same person are good for showing consistency of a provider, which does help me decide if I want to see her. Inconsistency is a killer for me.

no, it's not fair.

you should be skeptical of all reviews.

duh.

I'm only skeptical of those and a John Deere Review special. (smirk)

inorite?

i do tend to exaggerate, like, a million times a day.

I see what you did there..... NIIIIIIIIIIICE.....!

I say a review is just a general idea, some people click differently with others due to personalities. Not every experience can be the exact same.

no, it's not fair.

you should be skeptical of all reviews.

duh. Originally Posted by john_deere

True words indeed. A part of that is being familiar with the source too, and that is a lot more subtle than it might appear. For example, I have certainly given "yes" recommendations where, if you read the bulk of my reviews, the sessions I really enjoyed, that was clear from the review. Others might therefore be more properly understood to be damned with faint praise. Similarly, a certain level of honestly in complete disclosure, noting missteps-my own as well as those of the provider-as well as high notes are important.

I have given "yes" recommendations where only the most S&M among us would go.

That is why honesty and accuracy and a significant level of detail is important in every review, because WALDT and YMMV are always the rule. But if I am looking at visiting someone I have never seen before, and that provider is a known commodity, I will always spend as much time researching the reviewer as I do the provider.

This is only a SWMB, but I have always considered and evaluated the reputation of any writer for the reviews I find interesting.

True words indeed. A part of that is being familiar with the source too, and that is a lot more subtle than it might appear. For example, I have certainly given "yes" recommendations where, if you read the bulk of my reviews, the sessions I really enjoyed, that was clear from the review. Others might therefore be more properly understood to be damned with faint praise. Similarly, a certain level of honestly in complete disclosure, noting missteps-my own as well as those of the provider-as well as high notes are important.

I have given "yes" recommendations where only the most S&M among us would go.

That is why honesty and accuracy and a significant level of detail is important in every review, because WALDT and YMMV are always the rule. But if I am looking at visiting someone I have never seen before, and that provider is a known commodity, I will always spend as much time researching the reviewer as I do the provider.

This is only a SWMB, but I have always considered and evaluated the reputation of any writer for the reviews I find interesting. Originally Posted by Wallance