http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...tom_click=rss#
I'm sure there will not be any unintended consequences.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...tom_click=rss#Another reason to let those fucktards in CA succeed from the union.
I'm sure there will not be any unintended consequences. Originally Posted by wesmantooth
I think there is some confusion.California just has to be different and crazy.
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/12...-prostitution/
The state of California has not legalized child prostitution, contrary to reports you may have read online recently.
The law, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in September, does decriminalize prostitution in the case of minors — an important distinction as the law aims to protect children by treating them as victims, not as criminals.
SB 1322, in fact, bans police officers from charging minors with prostitution. Law enforcement officials will be able to take minors into temporary custody but under limited circumstances — including if there is an imminent threat to their lives.
And sex traffickers will still be held accountable.
Sounds like its decriminalizing it so that the victims don't get taken advantage of by weird laws. Kind of like how a kid can get put on a sex offender list by sending another kid a picture of themselves due to the strict letter of the law. Its better not to immediately jump to conclusions on more drastic news like this. Had me thinking shit was getting real for a minute. Originally Posted by akuma999