Mods, if you need to point me for this, I understand. In my opinion I haven't said anything below that isn't objectively true and verifiable.
BBWDeAnna doesn't like me. I don't like her. That's fine. Nothing says we have to like each other here.
She's been very vocal about her reasons for not liking me. I want to take an opportunity to respond. This will lead to her saying she controls me or changed the way I hobby somehow or any number of other insipid statements. So be it. She can and will say whatever she wants, but that doesn't mean it's true. More like wishful thinking.
BBWDeAnna is a troll. Her preferred means of attack is to post lengthy and insulting diatribes in threads trying to get someone to respond to them. When they do, that is her cue to become (more) self-righteous and lash out, as if she's the one being attacked. Classic troll maneuver. But, when she really wants to get nasty, she'd rather do it on her blog than here where she'll be responded to and people will see the responses. And yeah, I've been guilty of feeding the troll. This post is too, I suppose. My apologies for that to everyone except the subject.
In her blog, she claims I care what she thinks about me because I sometimes respond to what she has to say here. I do somewhat care what other people here think, some of them at least, but her? hahahahahahahaha!
I will just say this: One of us is writing paragraph after paragraph after paragraph of multiple, lengthy blog posts that most people will never see about the other person, and it isn't me. That seems a little obsessive, doesn't it?
If you haven't read her blog, it's a hoot. For some reason she's making people PM her to get the links now after having posted them before so you'll have to contact her for them.
Check out such classics as: "The Angry Hobbyiest" (sic), "The Arkansas Kliq", and "Kliqs-Why the Hobby Needs Them" for some truly inspired lunacy.
She says herself on her blog: "I am an antagonist, its what I do, its what I find amusement in.". Clearly that is true. Whatever floats her boat.
I'm not bothering to refute any of her claims here. Everyone will make up their own mind about what's what and nothing I say is going to change that.
I'm considering taking her off Ignore to read her sure-to-be-amusing response - which by the way, her responding will mean I control her, according to her twisted logic. I've also changed the way she blogs! But, I don't know if it will be worth taking her off Ignore because I think I already know what she will say. Something like:
blah blah blah blah blah WK blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Angry Hobbyiest (sic) blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Kliq blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I control him blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah changed the way you hobby blah blay blah blah blah blah blah blah blah in the hobby since 2001 blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Kliq blah blah blah blah WK blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
So, BBWDeAnna, if you want to attack me, here I am. But why not do it here on the board rather than on some obscure off-site blog where hardly anyone will see it? Go for it. Maybe I am predictable. But I'm not the only one.