LL - I clearly contradicted SomeOne - OP  , and with verifiable reason.  
I do not think "bitch-slapped" is a proper characterization of my post. 
SomeOne may at anytime take mouse in hand, move cursor to red triangle, and click on that icon. 
Then enter the offending post and reason for complaint into the pop-up screen.  
Review , then click "Send". 
I do enjoy being an educator. 
Now - On topic - a further report as to the handling of the Mueller report. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...69H?li=BBnb7Kz
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has submitted a confidential  report to Attorney General William P. Barr, marking the end of his  investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and  possible obstruction of justice by President Trump, a Justice Department  spokeswoman said. 
   
 The Justice Department notified Congress late Friday that it had  received Mueller’s report but did not describe its contents. Barr is  expected to summarize the findings for lawmakers in coming days. 
In 
a letter  to the leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary committees, Barr wrote  that Mueller “has concluded his investigation of Russian interference  in the 2016 election and related matters.” 
The  submission of Mueller’s report marks the culmination of his closely  held inquiry, a case that has engulfed the Trump administration since  its inception and led to multiple guilty pleas from former advisers to  the president. With the closing of his investigation, Congress and the  newly empowered Democratic House majority will soon assess his findings —  and determine what steps to take next. 
Barr wrote that Mueller  submitted a report to him explaining his prosecution decisions. The  attorney general told lawmakers he was “reviewing the report and  anticipate that I may be in a position to advise you of the Special  Counsel’s principal conclusions as soon as this weekend.”
The  attorney general wrote he would consult with Deputy Attorney General  Rod J. Rosenstein and Mueller “to determine what other information from  the report can be released to Congress and the public consistent with  the law, including the Special Counsel regulations, and the Department’s  long-standing practices and policies.” 
Barr  said there were no instances in the course of the investigation in  which any of Mueller’s decisions were vetoed by his superiors at the  Justice Department. 
“I remain committed to as much  transparency as possible, and I will keep you informed as to the status  of my review,” Barr wrote. 
After a week of growing expectation  that Mueller’s long-awaited report would soon arrive, a security officer  from Mueller’s office delivered it Friday afternoon to Rosenstein’s  office at Justice Department headquarters, according to spokeswoman  Kerri Kupec. Within minutes of that delivery, the report was transmitted  upstairs to Barr. 
Around 4:35, White House lawyer Emmet Flood  was notified that the Justice Department had received the report. About a  half-hour after that notification, a senior department official  delivered Barr’s letter to the relevant House and Senate committees and  senior congressional leaders, officials said. 
One official described the report as “comprehensive,” but added that very few people have seen it. 
Even  with the report’s filing, Mueller is expected to retain his role as  special counsel for a wind-down period, though it is unclear how long  that may last, officials said. A small number of his staff will remain  in the office to help shut down the operations. 
White House  spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said the next steps “are up to Attorney  General Barr, and we look forward to the process taking its course. The  White House has not received or been briefed on the Special Counsel’s  report.” 
Two of the president’s lawyers, Rudolph Giuliani and Jay  Sekulow, said in a joint statement: “We’re pleased that the Office of  Special Counsel has delivered its report to the Attorney General  pursuant to the regulations. Attorney General Barr will determine the  appropriate next steps.” 
Well before its completion, Mueller’s  report was a hotly debated issue. Lawmakers sought to wrest guarantees  from the Justice Department that the special counsel would give a  complete public accounting of what he found in the two-year inquiry. 
According  to Justice Department regulations, the special counsel’s report should  explain Mueller’s decisions — who was charged, who was investigated but  not charged, and why. 
Mueller’s work has consumed Washington and  at times the country, as the special counsel and his team investigated  whether any Trump associates conspired with Russian officials to  interfere in the election. 
It is unclear how much of what Mueller  found will be disclosed in Barr’s summary for Congress. Congressional  Democrats, anticipating an incomplete accounting, have already sent  extensive requests to the Justice Department for documents that would  spell out what Mueller discovered. 
Mueller’s work has led to criminal charges against 34 people, including six former Trump associates and advisers.  
Five  people close to the president have pleaded guilty: Trump’s former  campaign chairman, Paul Manafort; former deputy campaign manager Rick  Gates; former national security adviser Michael Flynn; former personal  attorney Michael Cohen; and former campaign adviser George Papadopoulos.  
A sixth, Trump’s longtime friend Roger Stone, was indicted in  January and accused of lying to Congress. He has pleaded not guilty. 
More  than two dozen of the people charged by Mueller are Russians, and  because the United States does not have an extradition treaty with  Russia, they are unlikely ever to see the inside of a U.S. courtroom. 
None  of the Americans charged by Mueller is accused of conspiring with  Russia to interfere in the election — the central question of Mueller’s  work. Instead, they pleaded guilty to various crimes including lying to  the FBI. 
The special counsel’s investigation was launched May 17,  2017, in a moment of crisis for the FBI, the Justice Department and the  country. 
Days earlier, President Trump had fired FBI Director  James B. Comey. The purported reason was Comey’s handling of the 2016  investigation of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, but Trump  said in an interview with NBC News shortly after the firing that he was  thinking about the Russia inquiry when he decided to remove Comey. 
Because  FBI directors are appointed to 10-year terms to ensure their political  independence, the Comey firing rattled Washington. It set off alarms in  the Justice Department and in Congress, where lawmakers feared the  president was determined to end the Russia investigation before it was  completed. 
After then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused  himself from the Russia investigation, Deputy Attorney General Rod J.  Rosenstein chose Mueller as special counsel in part to quell the  burgeoning political crisis. 
Mueller, a Vietnam War veteran,  prosecutor and former FBI director, was highly regarded. Politicians on  both sides of the aisle — as well as federal law enforcement and  intelligence veterans — had long admired and trusted Mueller, a  Republican. 
The special counsel’s takeover of the Russia  investigation left many of the president’s biggest critics more  confident that Trump would not be able to stop the inquiry before  Mueller obtained answers. 
While it had been publicly known since  the summer of 2016 that the FBI was investigating Russian attempts to  interfere with the presidential campaign, officials had largely kept  quiet that there was also an investigation, starting that July, to see  if Trump campaign advisers might be conspiring with the Russians. 
After Trump won the election, that investigation exploded into public view. 
By  late 2016 and early 2017, the FBI was investigating whether anyone  close to Trump had helped Russia in those efforts, even as Trump was  sworn into office and began filling senior government positions. 
Just  days into the new administration, FBI agents interviewed Flynn at the  White House, questioning him about his conversations during the  transition with Sergey Kislyak, then Russia’s ambassador to the United  States. Flynn would be forced out of the job a month later amid  accusations he had misled senior administration officials about those  conversations. 
The Mueller investigation pursued a number of  investigative tracks, including whether the president’s behavior leading  up to and after the firing of Comey amounted to an attempt to obstruct  justice. 
Throughout 2017, Mueller’s team, working out of an  office building in Washington, pursued Manafort over his finances. That  case also was inherited from work done previously by the Justice  Department and the FBI, but under Mueller it gained new life. In October  2017, Manafort and Gates, his right-hand man, were charged with a host  of financial crimes. 
Two months later, 
Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. 
Republican  political opposition to his work also grew, encouraged in part by the  president’s repeated declarations that the investigation was a “witch  hunt.” 
Within a day of Flynn’s plea, The Washington Post reported  that the former lead FBI agent on Mueller’s team, Peter Strzok, had  been removed from that position over anti-Trump text messages he had  exchanged with a senior FBI lawyer, Lisa Page. Both had worked on the  Clinton investigation, and their texts to each other during the campaign  revealed disdain for Trump. 
The texts, Justice Department  officials insisted, had not compromised the Russia investigation, but  they fueled a political counterattack by Republicans loyal to the  president who charged the FBI’s handling of the Clinton and Trump  matters showed the agency’s leadership was letting a political agenda  influence the inquiry. 
While those fights raged on, Mueller said  virtually nothing. In part because of this silence, political factions  tended to say almost anything they wanted about his work. Republicans in  the House Freedom Caucus called it a money-wasting farce; Democrats  touted every new investigative step as further evidence that the probe  was so serious that Trump’s days as president could be numbered. 
© J. Scott Applewhite/AP  Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. As the investigation pushed into its second year, it  took direct aim at Moscow. In February 2018, 13 Russians were charged as  part of an online 
“troll farm”  accused of sowing political division and distrust among Americans via  social media. Five months later, Mueller’s office indicted a dozen  Russian military intelligence officials, saying they conspired to hack  into Democrats’ computer accounts and publicize the stolen files. 
Last  year saw Mueller’s time and energy focused on the question of  obstruction. Whether Trump or his senior advisers had sought to stop or  cripple the Russia inquiry was a key reason that Mueller’s job as  special counsel existed in the first place. Mueller questioned those  closest to Trump about the president’s private statements concerning the  inquiry, about his tweets attacking law enforcement officials, and  about internal White House documents that might shed light on his  behavior. 
Proving a suspect’s intent is an important element of  any obstruction case, and there was one witness Mueller was never able  to get in a room: Trump. After negotiating for months, the president’s  lawyers agreed to submit written answers to questions from the special  counsel. Ultimately, Mueller and the Justice Department did not serve  the president with a subpoena, which could have led to a fight at the  Supreme Court. 
In August, Mueller’s team won a conviction of  Manafort in a Virginia courthouse at the same time Cohen, Trump’s former  lawyer and self-described fixer, was pleading guilty as part of a deal  with federal prosecutors in New York. Cohen would ultimately plead  guilty twice, and at his sentencing, he angrily blamed Trump for his  downfall. 
In January, 
Mueller’s team accused Stone  of obstructing the special counsel’s efforts and lying to Congress  about his efforts in 2016 to learn when potentially damaging emails from  Clinton’s presidential campaign would be released by the anti-secrecy  group WikiLeaks. 
Mueller’s final public indictment was emblematic  of much of his investigation — a person close to the president had been  arrested and charged with crimes, but not for conspiring with the  Kremlin. 
devlin.barrett@washpost.com
WAPO is hardly a Right wing newspaper.  It seems an even handed report of results so far and the way the report will be handled. 
I do hope the DPSY's on this Forum read the post - we will see what Barr releases and the Results -regarding IF  criminal collusion with Russians to influence the 2016 election by Trump is established. 
Does not mean that Cummings, Schiff, Pelosi, and Schumer won't cry about truly getting to the "True Facts"  if nothing in the report incriminates Trump .
They will continue their harassment investigations regardless - because they Can, and are motivated by True hate.