Muellers presser?

If he couldn’t indict a POTUS of a crime, WTF was he doing for 2yrs and spending 40 million? A fool on a fools errand.

Mueller is a naive idiot.

There was no collusion, but he says that even if he could find evidence of obstruction, he could not indict a sitting President.

So Congress will investigate more. And what are they investigating........? They are investigating President Trump getting pissed off about being falsely accused of collusion with the Russians.

This is what we are down to. The Democrats and the Main Stream Media forced a investigation on a crime that never occurred. Then when the President strongly defends himself for being falsely accused, they are able to say he is obstructing justice.

This is where we are in American Politics.

Lol

Nothing changes from the Mueller Report. There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you.

All that crying over OJ!!! He is obviously an innocent man. Just like trump.

Lol

Nothing changes from the Mueller Report. There was insufficient evidence and therefore, in our Country, a person is innocent. The case is closed! Thank you.

All that crying over OJ!!! He is obviously an innocent man. Just like trump. Originally Posted by Trey

You were absolutely correct in your first sentence. Your attempted sarcasm in your second sentence is false.

Why'd the DOJ give him a presser? They should have had him release a statement. Especially if he wasn't going to take questions.

So Mueller retired. Smells like he's leaving a sinking ship. Is this a signal for the HOR to call him to testify? Can the President still not allow him to testify? Didn't hear any new information.

Sounds like he's trying to protect "his team." Barr is getting close. How's there obstruction when the crime was committed by the Obama administration?

Tick Tock.

Why'd the DOJ give him a presser? They should have had him release a statement. Especially if he wasn't going to take questions.

So Mueller retired. Smells like he's leaving a sinking ship. Is this a signal for the HOR to call him to testify? Can the President still not allow him to testify? Didn't hear any new information.

Sounds like he's trying to protect "his team." Barr is getting close. How's there obstruction when the crime was committed by the Obama administration?

Tick Tock. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Oh, he can testify. He’s a private citizen now and can be compelled to testify. As he said, his report is his testimony. That’s all he can talk about. He didn’t find sufficient evidence to indict Trump of anything. A prosecutors job is not to exonerate. That’s for judges or jurors. He just gave cover to GoNadler to proceed with an impeachment circus. And to impugn Bill Barr and Trump.

You were absolutely correct in your first sentence. Your attempted sarcasm in your second sentence is false. Originally Posted by bambino

I was not being sarcastic. Thems facts boy. Tell us how its not. Based on the president the guy that killed that little girl in houston and disposed of the body he is innocent too. We don't have enough evidence so that equals innocence. So trump is as innocent as a molestering murderer of a little girl.

I was not being sarcastic. Thems facts boy. Tell us how its not. Based on the president the guy that killed that little girl in houston and disposed of the body he is innocent too. We don't have enough evidence so that equals innocence. So trump is as innocent as a molestering murderer of a little girl. Originally Posted by Trey

The fact is Trump was never accused of murder. He was accused of collusion. Which isn’t a crime in the first place. Dems the facts boi. If I were Trump, I would tell Barr to eliminate the DOJ policy that a sitting POTUS can’t be indicted. Then let Mueller take is flimsy case to court. Wether you like it or not, it’s the prosecution that has to prove GUILT, not INNOCENCE. Yep, Dems the facts.

What a joke. Trump is playing those fools like a fine tuned violin and they can't even see it. Like he says "what a bunch of losers." The dems are so going to lose. Can't wait to see those tears start to flow on snowflake faces.

Mueller made quite a few false statements. He also,claimed that he couldn't indict because the case would not go to court. So why did he indict those "Russian" companies, knowing full well they would never get their day in court? Saying he couldn't find "evidence to exonerate"? Just a ridiculous statement. Trump does not need evidence to exonerate him. Mueller needed to prove his case and he could not. Period. End of case. But Nadless and his cronies will go for the mirage and push for more investigations and impeachment. Of course Mueller doesn't want to testify. Then Republicans would get to question him too, and he really doesn't want to get asked hard questions.

Also, AG Barr said infatically, under oath, that Mueller told him three times that not being able to indict a sitting President DID NOT play into their decisions. Mueller said today that he did not consider indictment because you cannot indict a sitting President.

He basically called AG Barr a liar. The problem. Barr says others at the meeting heard Mueller tell Barr what Barr testified too.

Also, AG Barr said infatically, under oath, that Mueller told him three times that not being able to indict a sitting President DID NOT play into their decisions. Mueller said today that he did not consider indictment because you cannot indict a sitting President.

He basically called AG Barr a liar. The problem. Barr says others at the meeting heard Mueller tell Barr what Barr testified too. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Mueller comes off as a political hack. What he did today was Comey light in reverse. He didn’t have anything to prosecute Trump on so he punted it twice. Once to Barr, today to GoNadler. Comey, on the other hand, laid out the crimes Hillary committed. Lynch just signaled fair catch and walked off the field.

Mueller comes off as a political hack. What he did today was Comey light in reverse. He didn’t have anything to prosecute Trump on so he punted it twice. Once to Barr, today to GoNadler. Comey, on the other hand, laid out the crimes Hillary committed. Lynch just signaled fair catch and walked off the field. Originally Posted by bambino

i think Comey did what he did in part because Lynch told him not to press charges and unlike Mueller he had clear evidence. So he poked his boss in the eye. lol.

i think Comey did what he did in part because Lynch told him not to press charges and unlike Mueller he had clear evidence. So he poked his boss in the eye. lol. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Comey didn’t poke Lynch in the eye. He was Lynch’s lackey. He did what he was told to do. Lynch just caught the ball and walked off the field. But hey, Barr just threw a penalty flag.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Mueller made quite a few false statements. He also,claimed that he couldn't indict because the case would not go to court. So why did he indict those "Russian" companies, knowing full well they would never get their day in court? Saying he couldn't find "evidence to exonerate"? Just a ridiculous statement. Trump does not need evidence to exonerate him. Mueller needed to prove his case and he could not. Period. End of case. But Nadless and his cronies will go for the mirage and push for more investigations and impeachment. Of course Mueller doesn't want to testify. Then Republicans would get to question him too, and he really doesn't want to get asked hard questions. Originally Posted by Lantern2814

Mueller is gutless. He waste tax payer dollars for two years on a bogus investigation, then gives this chicken shit press release then resigns.


https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/29/polit...ion/index.html