Perfect Massage

Stopped by last night, greeted and led to a room by an Amy, dark brown hair, not a looker face wise, she asked for donation, before I handed it to her I told her to give me a look at her assets, she pulled up her skirt only to reveal her skinny legs and boney ass, fook that, I declined, as I began to walk out of room she said “other girl”, I had gotten a look at the other girl in the hallway, definitely nicer looking, but another customer had walked in and snatched her up while I was opting out, my girl then lowered her rate by .4, I still declined and bounced.
I can’t imagine this girl makes much money. This would be my first time not getting at least a decent looking provider in this shop.

Perfect Massage over on dairyashford near westpark rd

What a gentleman and a generous customer!

What a gentleman and a generous customer! Originally Posted by texasian2017

Txasian ,there is zero obligation to settle for a provider, that is of less quality than what you expect when you walk in the door.
You sound like Lexluber..

Hopefully, someone reads this and treats Amy like a person. Its a amazing that a person character is defined by $40 dollars.

Txasian.. lets just go ahead right now and out yourself.
Your a fucking " White Knight "..

Hopefully, someone reads this and treats Amy like a person. Its a amazing that a person character is defined by $40 dollars. Originally Posted by texasian2017

This is just odd. I get where you’re coming from, but it’s still odd considering the audience and topic.

Everyone picks their own hill to die on, but there are better hills, my man.

All this hill talk has me thinking about Coco on Antoine.

This is just odd. I get where you’re coming from, but it’s still odd considering the audience and topic.

Everyone picks their own hill to die on, but there are better hills, my man.

All this hill talk has me thinking about Coco on Antoine. Originally Posted by Bush_Pilot

LOL....

A white knight indeed, lol.
So had I stayed and been disappointed with her service, the follow up posts would have been “you should have opted out” “don’t let the smaller head do the thinking.” Naw, I rather bounce without the sad experience and regretted it later.
If a provider declines to BBBJ, is she treating customers less than human?

Hopefully, someone reads this and treats Amy like a person. Its a amazing that a person character is defined by $40 dollars. Originally Posted by texasian2017

Why do you suggest someone else TOFTT, why don’t you TOFTT. Don’t visit her and say you weren’t warned about her looks or lack thereof.

I don't get how some guys don't see what the site is about. It's NOT about judgment of each other or the morals of whatever activity. If you're into sessions with ladies dressed in a 3 piece suit it's all you man. The point is not to judge somebody else's kink or liking.

The point is to share intel, good or bad, with each other in an open way. BWS did that so nobody should judge over his actions.

If he did something violent to a lady, ripped off people, outed information that needed to be private, etc. that all needs to be called out and stopped but nobody should be critical of his opinion.

There's this saying, YMMV, just listen to it next time.

^^^^^^^^

Hopefully, someone reads this and treats Amy like a person. Its a amazing that a person character is defined by $40 dollars. Originally Posted by texasian2017

Texasian, have you completely lost the ability to reason or comment with anything resembling coherent thought?

Declining to have an intimate encounter with someone, especially when you will also have to pay for the privilege, has nothing whatsoever to do with "treating [them] like a person." Similarly, such a declination has nothing to do with a "person's character [being] defined by $40 dollars."

Rather, like any assessment that anyone makes in relation to what they find aesthetically pleasing and or sexually stimulating, this is a very personal choice. Further, no one should feel obligated to engage in sexual relations with another person just because that person may feel rejected, especially when one is paying. This basic logical construction should go without saying, absent which every hot girl would never be able to sleep or she would otherwise reject an unconscionably high percentage of all the men she meets (because that all let her know, one way or another, that they want her) and thereby fail to "treat them as a person".

Further to the foregoing, in a professional setting (i.e. pay for play), both the money and the perceived quality of the personal offering are the fungible elements to be exchanged between the parties. Naturally in such a construct there are many instances in which a provider's overall appeal for a given hobbyist falls below her asking price, and thus the hobbyist is rightly justified in declining. Similarly, a given provider may offer a charming gentleman like myself a nice services package for $100, whereas she may demand $160 for the same package from the hapless village idiot, because she abhors his company and therefore will only suffer it if he pays the extra $60. The examples of the fungibility in these exchanges are limitless, and hopefully you now have a grasp of the absurdity of your comments.

@elCid, well said.

LMAO! Thanks EC, your argument had me rolling! Made me think of...


https://youtu.be/EdCkrHa-pfY

And...

https://youtu.be/71xxvp5R9hE