I have watched an hour of it so far- I like Paul's response his answers seem to come from the heart. I think Perry looked very nervous on the SS and "ponzi scheme" question. Bachman will be toast- it seems like her answer always has some kind of "bashing Obama" comment in order to get a rise out of the audience- same with Newt.
Huntsman appears very relaxed and has very good sensible answers-they need to get Santorum more questions- for a minute I forgot he was there- this debate is so much better than MSNBC's debate.
So right now I will give the edge to Paul and Huntsman- I want thank Paul for telling the American people how taxes has went up in Texas under Perry. Perry is the big loser to me- looks nervous and is talking too much like a "politician".
Originally Posted by wellendowed1911
It was a better debate the what happened at the Reagan Library Debate, Wolf Blitzer was a bit more fair in distributing the questions instead of turning it into a Perry/Romney debate. But Wolf still didn't allow Ron Paul to answer the question on what he would do to the Federal Reserve, I thought that was bullshit because they know he is most likely the one who can fix this broken system.
Perry was getting grilled on Social Security being a Ponzi scheme. It's funny how he's now changing his viewpoint on the subject. He also got grilled on the question pertaining to forced gardasil shots from Bachman and Santorum. Bachman made Perry look like an ass on that subject, real bad! All Perry had to do was open his mouth and he's going to sink himself. I thought he was smarter than Bush Jr., apparently not. As far as the illeagal immigrants going to college in Texas, can you say free ride! Thats not going to sit well with college students in Texas who are natural citizens getting deeply in debt to go to college. The Bilderberg Group chose poorly in choosing Perry to represent their interests, I don't respect Perry for bowing down before the money masters to do thy masters bidding, "if" he gets elected and thats a big "if". Everyone of these debates for Perry are getting worse and worse.
Bachman had to mouth off that she was the founder of the Tea Party Caucus, she's forgetting that Ron Paul is the Godfather of the Tea Party Movement! He started it all and she wants credit like Al Gore wants credit for inventing the interent, give me a break! Romeny will be a pro Wall St. candidate, he used to own a hedge fund and he'll just continue the lives of the zombie banks in the U.S. and Wall St. bailouts. Perry would do the same thing, Bilderberg Group is all I need to say on that.
As far as Ron Paul getting booed, people in today's society just don't want to believe the truth. They think the easter bunny is for real, the tooth fairy exists, santa claus comes down every chimney, they think they don't have to build a retirement since social security will save them when their old, and the sky is purple when it's really blue. For Herman Cain not being a politician I thought he did alright from a businessman's perspective but I'm speculating on his 999 plan. It's going to be interesting to see what these politicians have to say for their CPAC speeches.