You have received an infraction at ECCIE Worldwide....

So, delimex_07 has awarded me an infraction for "Spam." It's true that I rtm-ed about 30 rude fucking posts directed at Foxtrotdancer; if I had more patience, it would have been closer to 50 RTMs, or better, but i have effing add. totally my bad. i promise to do better, going forward..

What I like about Delimix_07 is that he had the balls to point and ban Cendell, who engaged in a campaign of phuckery against new member Foxtrotdancer, that at 5 points a pop, should have been good for about 300+ points. what is that, like a 7 year ban?

Let's get a couple things straight. First, in case you haven't noticed, I give exactly zero fucks all total about points and bans. Second, I had a beer with Foxtrotdancer. He's a white professional like myself, and therefore, cannot possibly be Shinepro, who, as I understand it, is black, but also a professional. Don't get me wrong. He probably makes more picking up dogshit than i do as a college professor. Adjuncts are on about the same level as dogshit-picker-uppers, as far as i can see, although they get paid less..

Moreover, not only did Cendell mis-identify Foxtrotdancer as one of Shinepro's many multi-handles, but the following persons signed off on Cendell's false allegation that Foxtrotdancer is actually Shinepro, and proceeded to attack and demean Foxtrotdancer based on this false and defamatory allegation, while conducting zero due diligence to confirm that Foxtrotdancer is in fact actually Shinepro, which he most assuredly is not:
Demolition;
Reese McClain;
Unique Carpenter (dammit UC, how in the fuck did you drop the ball this bad? but you still stand as the best mod Houston Coed has ever had, imho; so i argued that a Warning should entirely suffice.);
Busty;
Dorian Gray;
Someone else too, but i can't remember his damn name. Maybe someone can do me a solid and provide the missing handle.

To summarize, then, the scope of a large portion of this thread is, "You have received an infraction at ECCIE," to which I addend the following responsive rebuttal:

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahah ahahahahahahahahahah..

And can someone help Delimix_07 out by citing and then defining where it says anything about "Spam" as grounds for an infraction? I think it's actually merely aspirational at this point, at best. However, maybe a rule should be added defining Spam, and then prohibiting it, as contrary to the general entertainment value and esprit-de-corps that is supposed to imbue Houston Coed with its very vitality and raison d'etre..

"Are you not entertained? Is that not why you are here?" It's certainly my only reason to be here, to be entertained, and even sometimes maybe, on a good day, to entertain. I have some juicy chapters to add to the Crazy Vegas Adventures thread, both on the "When we were clowns" side of the ledger, and the "When we were kings" side as well, surprisingly.

Anyway, I think Spam could be a legitimate basis for an infraction. However, as of now, citing Spam as grounds for an infraction appears to be on ontological thin ice and might very well crack right beneath Delimix_07's feet..

LEAVE DELIMEX007 ALONE, He is doing his job.
You could have asked him in private but this thread is really about a provider that has a voice even beyond these walls.
She has never made a point of thinking about you while you were Banned.

Move on and stop being creepy.

#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.

If it’s more than a paragraph I don’t read.

If OP thinks about it no mod banned his buddy. His buddy banned himself. There are rules that are published and need to be followed by the community. If they are not followed then there are repercussions. Either by points or by being banned for awhile. The mod didn’t just pick his name out of a hat and arbitrarily hit the ban button. So if you wanna see who banned your drinking buddy then go by him a beer and look him in the face and you will seen who banned him.

TLDR. Why don't you PM an admin and whine about it?

He wants to air his dirty laundry in open forum.

He wants to air his dirty laundry in open forum. Originally Posted by DoubleEagle

That's cool. I RTMed his post for violation of guidelines.

I, for one, give zero fucks for your post and whining. How about quitting the cry club and go back to what this forum is about and provide some reviews and useful information to share

Some are making pxs point for him.
Just saying

Some are making pxs point for him.
Just saying Originally Posted by winn dixie

The voice of reason.

I rarely come into coed, but every time I do, I see some dumb shit like this and it reminds me to not come in so frequently.

Bean has the thread winning comment