Church and State

https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...-faith-office/


that's illegal

Ok ona, why do t u give us ur wisdom on how thats illegal

And if u just say separation of church and state, then u dont k ow what ur talking about

Ok ona, why do t u give us ur wisdom on how thats illegal

And if u just say separation of church and state, then u dont k ow what ur talking about Originally Posted by chizzy

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct!

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct! Originally Posted by Snafu412

AFAIK, I have not received orders from the government to join a particular religion.

They better permit the Satsnic Temple to be represented. And Muslims... among others.

Fuck Scientology tho

AFAIK, I have not received orders from the government to join a particular religion.

Originally Posted by Devo

What ona is talking about and what trump is doing is absolutely illegal.
It's not trumps house it's the people's house. It's federal property and the constitution applies!
We need another lawsuit!

1st amendment establishment clause states that the state cannot favor one religion over another or establish a state religion!
Hence the separation of church and state!
So yes he is correct! Originally Posted by Snafu412

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...

#### Salty

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...


#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Yes we should all admire the traitorous criminal.
Your in a cult!

... President Trump is NOT favouring "one religion" -
He's showing favour to ALL religions! ...

Trump is a man to be admired! ... Winning! ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Proof that you didn't read the document. It clearly says it is to target anti-semantic and anti-christian bias.


The government combating nazis is going to be quite difficult when the signal is coming from inside the white house, but I'm willing ti not debate how the current admin is full of nazis.


But the government combating anything that it is anti-christian is fucked up. They can't do this. It's illegal and violates the first amendment.

Proof that you didn't read the document. It clearly says it is to target anti-semantic and anti-christian bias.


The government combating nazis is going to be quite difficult when the signal is coming from inside the white house, but I'm willing ti not debate how the current admin is full of nazis.


But the government combating anything that it is anti-christian is fucked up. They can't do this. It's illegal and violates the first amendment. Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

It already dose we have hate crimes statutes. That includes religion. This is just more bullshit from the horses ass! I seriously doubt that you can constitionally set up shit like that on federal property!
And you all say the the dems are always setting u bullshit agencies!
So keep waving your pompoms it's the one thing you do best, are you wearing a pleated skirt too?
Just curious.

... You're WRONG yet-again... The Government CAN combat
anti-Christian attacks, threats and violence.
Just like it can with the anti-Israel attacks.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

FURTHER proof that you didn't read the document.


It says anti-christian BIAS. A geology book that says anything happened more than 6 thousand years ago can be considered anti-christian bias.

FURTHER proof that you didn't read the document.


It says anti-christian BIAS. A geology book that says anything happened more than 6 thousand years ago can be considered anti-christian bias. Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Apparently he hasn't read the constitution either!
That's OK the orange turd apparently is constitutionaly illerate too!

Apparently he hasn't read the constitution either!
That's OK the orange turd apparently is constitutionaly illerate too! Originally Posted by Snafu412

It's obvious who hasn't read the Constitution.

Because they tore it up long ago, and wiped their ass with it.

"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."

Apparently he hasn't read the constitution either!
That's OK the orange turd apparently is constitutionaly illerate too! Originally Posted by Snafu412

Yeah - "Shall NOT Be Infringed"...

#### Salty