Encounter: A visit with a perfect and breathtaking lady

User ID: Spider-fly
Date: 3/02/2025
Name: Sophie
Phone: (737)306-5418
Email Address: https://skipthegames.com/posts/albuq...3/151085236407
URL (Profile or Bio Page): -
City: Albuquerque
State: New Mexico
Address: -
Appointment Type: Incall
Activities: Convo, mish, doggie, light kissing
Duration of Encounter: 30 minutes
Hair Length and Color: Shoulder long and black
Age: 25
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Super model perfection, Sophie has delicate soft curves.
Recommendation: Yes

Very boring review

This feels like a mobile ad game review. No real details just "this is great there's not many games on the market like this and I get free daily login rewards."

"This feels like a mobile ad game review. No real details just "this is great there's not many games on the market like this and I get free daily login rewards."

Nobody asked my opinion but that's how it reads.

�� ... Do we get points for reviews,!?! ��

Ha ha, you guys are funny. I stopped caring about premium access a long time ago. It is beyond funny that many of you want verbal porn in a review. At this point, the only thing any of this is good for is to vet legit providers. The only time premium acess was worth it was when this site was more like P411

Sophie is real and legit. The End. All her different reviews show that many of us have had varied experiences with her. Also, good luck with your careers as aspiring erotic writers, ha ha. Also don't worry, this site has just about swore me off of doing any reviews. I do not care in the least about attempting to appease horny dudes with cartoon-like descriptions of novel sex acts. The only values of these reviews is for safety, to sort explotative trash hoes from legit providers.

�� ... Do we get points for reviews,!?! �� Originally Posted by marathonman

The site incentivises certain types of reviews to sell premium access. There is also a monger only forum with more detailed details on providers and happenings around the city. For me, that access was worth it only when more providers were active on the site. Over the last few years, almost no providers engage with people. When it does happen, they usually post in the co-ed forum and communicate via normal phone text or pm anyway. Most providers want to keep mongers they like on speed dial because they know you are safe and a source of income. However, I striongly caution about ever getting to close. Hobby interactions are not real! They are only ever consentual fun.

Specific topics like bare and especially anal get ridiculous attention. There are literallly a ton of dudes who obcess about packing the fudge, so much so that saying a provider is into those specific fetishes almost gareentees multipage replies to a post. What gets lost is that many of us do not want any of that. We are not reading reviews to get off. A brief menu decription of activities and knowing if a provider is legit is more than enough. Toxic trolling has found has become more of the norm on this site and it has driven many away. Also knowing how varied an experince can be helps. YMMV can be a deal breaker but can also be a decent calculated risk. It's your call as how to proceed at that point.

Hmmm,
I just want to make sure she doesn't have a cock before I meetup. I don't need the drama...

Idk man be it a review of sketchy trash “providers” or a rant about a piece of shit pocket knife on Amazon a bit of detail is always welcomed with any written piece of info. Anyway shes been mentioned here before so my mind is made up to go and see what this critter is all about when I get the chance.

What you call toxic trolling is what others may call being a straight shooter. At the end of the day the rest of the story is the rest of the story to see what happened during the encounter. It has nothing to do with premium access and everything to do with being detailed. Some providers get a yes recommendation but the rest of the story doesn't add up to me specifically so I pass. Saying someone is super awesome cool exciting amazing doesn't really say anything but just typing a word salad.

I also disagree, it's not trying to get off from a review but being detailed. Some providers will come back if business is booming for them and detailed reviews allow people to make decisions based off what they read and if they want to partake.

You're also attempting to borderline grandstand saying premium doesn't matter, saying people who think there could be more are aspiring erotica writers and in the past wrote the same details you highlighted while partaking in the hobby which is puzzling to me. Everyone here is generally the same plus or minus a few kinks.

This isn't me being hostile in any manner if it comes off that way.

With all due respect spider, your rant is all over the place. Seems you were butthurt by Wishbones comment so now you're done with premium and posting reviews.
Without the ROS this site would be useless. Without ROS You don't even know if you got the same gal as the last gal. You at least know it's her if the description includes mention of a scar, a tattoo, a C section, a birthmarck, snaggletooth or a mole on her cheek.
Furthermore, you mention, the site insentivizes "certain" reviews. You receive unpaid premium access for every review that follows the sides guidelines. That's a very good reason to write reviews. All reviews are a little bit of a brag and the sharing of information that may help a fellow decide whether to visit or not. There are very few reviews that are verbal porn. Most are a mix of facts as they experienced the session and some opinion to guide others.
Lastly. We all write reviews as we see fit. Personally I never finished high school and know i'm a terrible writer. But I do it to help others and also selfishly so that they will share information with me. If a guy's not providing information through reviews, I'm not even answering his DM.
End of my rant.

Scrapee? Honestly?


Premium isn't particularly useful anymore. At least not in New Mexico (some regions are still bumping). It isn't providers providing limited scope advertising or super secret new spots or how to order from the good menu. It is mostly the same people talking everywhere else but with a lot more arguments over whether a review site should review Her. And I am sure I am not the only person who already gets more than enough of the guy who bought her client list constantly bouncing between advertising and aggressively demanding people not advertise.




As for knowing if you got the same gal? What does that really matter? Are you going to stop a session the moment her top comes off because the AMP unicorn of the month totally has more mommy damage than that so this is an imposter! Gals move around or have off days (or just hate a given punter). There is maybe more of an argument for that with traditional escorts (a few months back I am pretty sure a gal on tour was actually two women, for example) but you shouldn't be relying on text interviews to vet someone anyway. It is worth letting people know that an ad might actually be two lookalike gals but... does it make a huge difference if that is the same "person" that previous reviews were for? Are you going to say "And I want the good Sally, not the bad Sally" and expect to get any response?


Personally? I still write a review if I think something was interesting or there is enough value for others (at which point I DON'T put that in the ROS). But reviews on here (and some other boards) have really become worse than useless due to a mix of low traffic (provider and monger) and people being incentivized to write ANYTHING to get access to ROS. Which actually DOES encourage the "you'll never believe what happened to me" style letters. Same as "I never asked her name so I'll just pick a random popular one for credit" which hurts those who want to make sure they know exactly who is sucking them off.


A few years ago? This place was awesome and it was well worth getting premium to help vet providers after checking if they are legit via reverse image searches and the like. These days? Even a lot of the gals who tour regularly are new enough to have no reviews on this site (and one from five years ago isn't particularly useful... outside of laughing at how she has been in her 20s for 20 years).

It's hit and miss as far as reviews go ... Spider had a great encounter with Sophie, and mine was not so great ... I've seen other providers based on reviews here ... some have been spot on, others not so much. I have definitely seen a trend where my perspective seems to align with certain mongers on here, and so I might give those reviews more credence. However, at the end of the day, there are numerous aspects that could impact a visit that are hard to account for when providing or perusing reviews. I do tend to shade toward AMPs because of very low chances with drama. However, someone mentioned risk-reward, and I completely agree when it applies to freelance providers. I wish everyone luck and safety as they partake in the industry.

Hmmm,
I just want to make sure she doesn't have a cock before I meetup. I don't need the drama... Originally Posted by maxcar2110

I can confirm there was no presence of Captain Winkie with Sophie ... lol

Spider I agree with much of what you said. I travel quite a bit and I have trustworthy friends in the cities I do business. DMs are my best source of accurate info. But i've found much value in reviews. I feel more are accurate than not. We both know there are no guarantees. This is no different than any product you buy or service you get. Fake online reviews, differing opinions and different experiences. I WAS ten years with rub maps and nearly 10 before that a member of various online communities.
Personally, i've found ECCIE to be the most trustworthy.