I think this boils down to the following key question:
Which side enjoys "escalation dominance?" (That is, which party can continue to up the ante in a less disadvantageous manner than the opposing party?) Or, perhaps the more pertinent question is which side
believes that it holds escalation dominance. For that side is unlikely to cave first.
Trump undoubtedly believes that we hold more high cards, and since we import so staggeringly much stuff from China, maybe we do. But we don't have the stomach for a hyper-aggressive, mutually damaging standoff, since there are elections to consider. Also, China seems to have little objection to opposing economy-impeding hardship on its citizens, as we saw during the extremely draconian covid shutdown when they shuttered large swaths of the economy and locked millions of people in their own apartments.
Back in Trump's first term, when he started the First Trade War with China, some of us here shouted the alarm that China had the power to bring certain U.S. industries and companies, including defense manufacturers, to their knees, by shutting off rare earth materials. Did Dumb Ass Trump do anything about this, to secure supplies of rare earth elements and magnets outside of China prior to starting the trade wars? How about Dumb Ass Biden, who continued on with the Chinese trade war when he came to office? Hell no. In fact, the first indication that the Pentagon had even begun to stockpile certain critical minerals came a few days ago:
Originally Posted by Tiny
Marco Rubio certainly has been concerned about this, as is evidenced in the following interview from January of this year:
https://www.state.gov/secretary-marc...yn-kelly-show/
...At such time as China shuts down the USA's manufacture and import of all products and parts with even a trace of Chinese rare earth elements, what effect will that have on the "global power alignment"? Yeah, with time the USA will be able to find substitutes for and develop its own sources of rare earth elements. But what's going to happen during the two or three or ten years while that transition occurs? Will China be in the catbird seat if it decides to take over Taiwan? Will the PRC military become technologically superior to the USA's?
Originally Posted by Tiny
As regards the question of trade policy vis-a-vis the struggle over global power alignments, I see both as part & parcel of the CCPs all-encompassing quest for global hegemony.
You think China has the upper hand? Did you notice what just happened in the Middle East? Guess who needs ME cooperation for fuel? Yeah CHYNAH.
Originally Posted by texassapper
Certainly, and that's a key point. But as long ago as 1992, Deng pointed out that China has cards to play, too, when he pointed out the following:
"The Middle East has oil, but China has rare earths."
And they played their cards very aggressively in 2010 when they got into a spat with Japan pursuant to Japanese patrol boats seizing Chinese fishing trawlers near the disputed islands. Then Japan had to engage in some frantic scrambling in order to keep their car and electronics production flow moving.
We should have seen something like this coming many years ago.
Just this past week, Jeremy Siegel, the Wharton professor who appears frequently on Bubblevision, described it as "scandalous" that we didn't start building a strategic mineral reserve more than a decade ago. In the 1970s, following the oil embargo of 1973, policymakers created the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in order to ensure adequate supplies in the event of a crisis potentially affecting national security and military preparedness.
Shouldn't we have begun building rare earth reserve capacity a generation ago?