https://newsinterpretation.com/tim-s...strations/amp/
I don't see how he didn't see this coming
We actually don’t need them. We need reliable, marketable sources that can stand on their own feet, like nuclear. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeI'm all for Nuclear and ALL energy sources. Nobody has a market on the production of it. We also should be subsidizing ALL energy sources as it will breed innovation and clean isn't bad. It may not be as efficient from a cost to produce- but it may be needed from an environmental and consumption perspective. I'd be all for 20 new nuke plants being put up in the country to help with all the energy needs as well as electric charging stations- where we are actually investing domestically for the LONG HAUL, vs a 4 yr political cycle.
I don’t have a problem with nuclear but it has never not once stood on its own, at least not in the US. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
If you want to cut a green energy program try clean coal, which will never really be clean, and ethanol / biofuels. that’s a real waste. Originally Posted by txdot-guyClean Beautiful coal is anything but clean. Having lived in Western PA for 40 yrs- I recall those days of watching triaxle after triaxle rolling at 70 mph down two lane roads and feeding the steel industry. It likely was the single most detrimental environmental destroyer locally with subsidence issues and mine water fucking up water streams and leaving destruction after mines were closed and owners just walked away from them without reclamation by leaving a broken bulldozer on the property as it being still "functional".