"Great Legs" is really subjective...
Originally Posted by phildo
Actually, it's not subjective at all.
He specifically asked for "not muscular, just toned and lithe". It appears that very few posters know what "lithe" means. Let me help:
Focus on the "athletically SLIM" part of the definition.
Maybe two of the women who posted here fit the definition.
Ballerina legs? Good. Long, slim and toned.
Mary Lou Retton legs? Bad. Short, thick, overly muscular.
Kim Kardashian legs? Do I really need to answer that?
Does that help?