Poor Stevie you don't remember the conventions of 1968 when the media and liberal establishment said that it was a right for every citizen to be allowed to attend the conventions? You assume a lot, probably too much. It says if you don't have photo ID then you don't get in. Okay, what if a delegate has not ID? That is what they are talking about. You see many delegates are political neophytes and no one knows who they are. You lose the argument because apparently the hypocritical democrats don't want the wrong people in attendance much less voting. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornHow would you ever grade one of your student's/victim's papers?
How would you ever grade one of your student's/victim's papers?You are such a foolish fuck. 1 year ago my brother found our our Dad had still been voting, he passed away 9 years ago, was a registered Dem, but hadn't voted for a Dem since Johnson. And that's in Pa, one of the most corrupt, so fuck you very much....
You're a train wreck.
Apparently voter fraud is NOT an issue and cannot be proven to be an issue. It is undeniably being used by TPunks to intimidate people and to make it more difficult for traditionally Democratic-leaning voters to vote.
The requirement of a photo I.D. to enter a private event is not germane to the voter ID argument, stupid. Originally Posted by Little Stevie
1 year ago my brother found our our Dad had still been voting, he passed away 9 years ago, was a registered Dem, but hadn't voted for a Dem since Johnson. Originally Posted by seedman55So please release the details. Voter fraud, if it really happened as you claim it did, is often punishable by a prison sentence yet you just make an anecdotal claim without facts. And since ballots are secret, how do you know for whom your dead father's imitator voted?
The property owners knew each other -- they were neighbors. No newly arrived, same day registering, apartment dwelling (i.e., property-less) strangers were allowed to vote.
Gee, the TPunk "pedestalized" Founding Fathers didn't put dragging your unfinished Gilbert Stuart portrait to the polls as a requirement in the constitution. There were no photo IDs then. Oh the horror!
Originally Posted by Little Stevie
So please release the details. Voter fraud, if it really happened as you claim it did, is often punishable by a prison sentence yet you just make an anecdotal claim without facts. And since ballots are secret, how do you know for whom your dead father's imitator voted?He wont answer the question because he cant.
And Boltfan, I have no desire to debate about why putting the cart before the horse is a hard way to ride in a cart. Address the other issue of there not being enough voter fraud in the whole U.S. to fill half of Lew Sterrett with those found guilty. That FACT alone begs the question of why only Teapublicans are pushing the measure.
Gee, the TPunk "pedestalized" Founding Fathers didn't put dragging your unfinished Gilbert Stuart portrait to the polls as a requirement in the constitution. There were no photo IDs then. Oh the horror!
Originally Posted by Little Stevie
So please release the details. Voter fraud, if it really happened as you claim it did, is often punishable by a prison sentence yet you just make an anecdotal claim without facts. And since ballots are secret, how do you know for whom your dead father's imitator voted? Originally Posted by Little StevieDead people voting? and you're wondering how the imitator voted?