Pics in Ads

A comment or two in another thread got me thinking about the images in provider ads. It was said that it's "ok" to use fake pics as long as they accurately represent the person in the ad. From a "what does she look like" perspective I get that attitude. I also understand some providers don't want to show their face.

Here's my concern: if I see a face in an ad, and the face that opens the door is different, shouldn't I say "I'm sorry, I have the wrong room," and walk away - lest the young lady place me handcuffs that are not the fun kind? On another note, for those ads that don't show the provider's face - how can a reviewer say - she looks just like her pics? Come on! Really? What are you using to make that determination - her toes or her butt?

I like what some of our ladies around here do - those who don't want their face all over the internet. They don't show their face in the public ad, but have "member only" folders that show their face on their website. That way if I'm interested I can request access, see the pics, know who I'm suppose to see open the door, and decide if I like the way she looks.

Brother,
As I see it, if your spidey sense goes off as you knock on a door, after the lady has answered or heck 1/2 through a session, you are completely clear to go.
That is my opinion.

Take care and be safe.

You men are to blame for that crap. You guys let the ladies use the, "The pic isn't me, but I look JUST like her" excuse all the time. You NEVER call them out on it and if someone does, there's always the WK who comes to her defense. Stop seeing them or start telling them to use a real pic. But, some of you let your dicks do the thinking for you.

Some of you think its OK for a chick to use a fake pic due to "privacy reasons," My ass!! You think its OK now, but when you get burned you'll be the one whining the most about how could a chick do this to you.

There's 100 different ways that a lady can have a picture taken without her face being shown or do like I've done since getting on the internet, have a website and the face pics are password protected. They could also blur their face out and hide any scars or tattoos that could give away their true identity.

Ladies are going to get away with what you continue to allow them to get away with. Just like if a guy shorts a lady continously with every visit, its not his fault after the 2nd, its her fault for allowing him to get away with it and not speaking up.

ME-OW Ms. E!!

I know there are guys who raise the BS flag when the pics are fake - burk and nash do for sure.
I'm leaning toward not seeing anyone new if they don't have a real face pic, password protected or otherwise. I know that will eliminate a lot of potential, but the not knowing when the door opens is a deal breaker in our current environment.
Gotta agree with MsE - the gals will do what we allow them to get away with. If we gents required this, then more ladies would do as MsE and make them available on a controlled basis.

As for thinking with lil head over big head...Once that lil prick is awake there's neither rest nor rational thought.

You men are to blame for that crap. You guys let the ladies use the, "The pic isn't me, but I look JUST like her" excuse all the time. You NEVER call them out on it and if someone does, there's always the WK who comes to her defense. Stop seeing them or start telling them to use a real pic. But, some of you let your dicks do the thinking for you.

Some of you think its OK for a chick to use a fake pic due to "privacy reasons," My ass!! You think its OK now, but when you get burned you'll be the one whining the most about how could a chick do this to you.

There's 100 different ways that a lady can have a picture taken without her face being shown or do like I've done since getting on the internet, have a website and the face pics are password protected. They could also blur their face out and hide any scars or tattoos that could give away their true identity.

Ladies are going to get away with what you continue to allow them to get away with. Just like if a guy shorts a lady continously with every visit, its not his fault after the 2nd, its her fault for allowing him to get away with it and not speaking up. Originally Posted by MsElena

I agree with MsElena.
However, I would have said it with more emphasis.

Yes in agreement after that insight because yes faces can be blurred etc.... im wrong ms. e props....

I calls em as I sees em. If the pic is fake I don't let them in. They should be called out for using fake pics every time. But that's just me

I started in an age prior to the internet. Pics were not an option. We would call an agency in NY, LA, Dallas, Atlanta, San Fran or where-ever and take our chances the expeditor / agent would understand and respect our requests. Our conversations were limited to body types and what he/she had working that evening. In the event of a mistake, our recourse was to nominally tip the woman, send her back and wait for the next woman the disptacher would send. It was extraordinarily diffidcult for everyone.

Flash forward: We are now deluged with pics. Reviews. Bios, etc. The competitive forces on providers have got to be enormous. Stay young, out-do your competitition, out-please your patrons, compete, compete, compete, while posturing you are not competing. Capitalism at its best and worst simultaneously. The woman who undertakes the challenge has got balls most of us take supplements to achieve.

In such an environment I absoluetly do not blame a lady if she does not post a face pic. What with facial recognition software and the prying eyes of everyone older than 8 with a Facebook account, and the fact any significant employer does a thorough background check which includes a thorough online check, I totally understand a woman keeping her identity (especially her facial identity) to herself and her verified patrons of her arts.

However, the woman who advertises with a face pic, and/or who uses her own real world ID and street address for registering her website - thereby linking her real world name and ID with her alter ego (which I know at least one does locally), and/or, who has podcast / downloadable web-cam sexual events showing her face and voice (which I know at least one does locally), and/or, who blends their multiple paths in life into a single journey, risks a great deal. As well as everyone she ever sees.

With all that said, fake pics are exactly that fake. Most men like a "type" and when they find a pic, they expect that "type" of woman to be there. When that person does not shoe up, the entire transaction is undercut. That is not to say they not be great - it is just not the basis of the bargain, and normally a disappointment.

There are woman on here who go to great lengths to present honest, accurate, current pics which simultaneously protect their personal ID's to prying eyes, while educating new patrons, and rewarding continuing patrons. (After all beauty is art and patrons supports art.) It is self-defeating if we do not support them. The market demands the buyer of goods keep the marketplace honest by demanding accurately represented goods.

I do apprecate there are always extenuating circumstances, and I feel confident this instance is exactly that, but providers need to be rewarded for honesty, and those who stray from the path encouraged to get onto the path. It is in our own self-interests.

We may have our familial spats, but it is in our self interests to play by the same rules.

This kind of thing has almost happened to me once.


I arrived.
I said to her. “You're not the lady in the pics.”
She drew close to remove my outer coat and I obliged.
It had been misting outside and my clothes had to be cool to her touch but
she drew close and looking up at me she said. “They're mine.”


I placed my index finger under her chin and tilted her head up to look at her closely.
Her face was similar but I could not swear it was her in the pictures and I said so.
She didn't smile. She took her left hand and gently put it behind my head and drew me to her lips.
Her waist was small and warm to the touch.
She was Russian and she knew she had me.


To make a long story short, she was the gal in the pics sans makeup.
I miss her.

I can never tell what a woman looks like when she kisses me...it always a case of "eyes wide shut."

I agree with MsElena.
However, I would have said it with more emphasis. Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius

OMG MA!

I agree with MsElena.
However, I would have said it with more emphasis. Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius

I was being nice. Want me to be more blunt and totally honest about it?


Remember.......careful what you wish for.

I was being nice. Want me to be more blunt and totally honest about it?


Remember.......careful what you wish for. Originally Posted by MsElena

I wish for...

I sometimes end up with...

Gotta figure out this communication thing between Venus and Mars.

Have a great weekend!