A post for Olivia H and Luxury Daphne, and anyone else who cared to ask

The link provided is a proper citation. However, it would have been more obvious to a hurried reader to italicize the words since it is too hard to box quote it online.

Or you could have simply used quotation marks. That said, I could tell it was a quote and do not judge it to be plagiarism.

Case dismissed with prejudice.

{{{bangs her gavel}}} Originally Posted by LilMynx69

I italicized and highlighted the quote(s). There were two quotes and two links....Maybe next time I can put it in color by number form for Olivia.

Thank you, and I believe that's what I said. That is I said it is my perception that it was his words.

. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

So your perception was clearly wrong but then you continue with your pattern of lies when you say this:

. I get it you’re not educated and probably never knew the proper way.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Normally when your perception is wrong one would apologize for accusing one of plagiarizing the author. Not you , you double down on stupid. I was not the one having trouble with common citations on the internet. You were. You then tried to blame your ignorance on me. Please tell us the proper way? Provide a link showing that I did not properly cite my source? If not we will assume that you were lying again.


Just like you were lying when you said art was not a commodity and I proved that perception a lie.

Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
The Mona Lisa is not a commodity yet it has been sold. Michael Angelo never provided a commodity when he painted. Period.

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni (6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564

Are you stuck in the 1500's? Is that why you are having trouble with knowing wtf a commodity is? You want to adhere to the definition of a commodity from 4-500 years ago. I didn't realize you were that old Olivia. Catch up to the rest of the world girl. Quit using definitions of words from 500 years ago.




http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/

Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties.


http://artcommodity.com/

Art has become heavily commodified. Like the ubiquitous stock market, it has become something that people can invest in and trade. Originally Posted by WTF

You idiot. I guess I should have done this earlier:

Definition of lie:

3lie
verb \ˈlī\
liedly·ing \ˈlī-iŋ\
Definition of LIE
intransitive verb
1
: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2
: to create a false or misleading impression
transitive verb
: to bring about by telling lies <lied his way out of trouble>

4lie
noun \ˈlī\
Definition of LIE
1
a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to be untrue with intent to deceive
b : an untrue or inaccurate statement that may or may not be believed true by the speaker
2
: something that misleads or deceives
3
: a charge of lying (see 3lie)

Link: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lie

Definition of disagree:

dis·agree
intransitive verb \ˌdis-ə-ˈgrē\
: to have a different opinion : to fail to agree
: to be different
: to not be suitable for or pleasing to someone

CloseStyle: MLA APAChicago




Full Definition of DISAGREE
1
: to fail to agree <the two accounts disagree>
2
: to differ in opinion <he disagreed with me on every topic>
3
: to cause discomfort or distress <fried foods disagree with me>

Link: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disagree

Definition of Opinion:

opin·ion
noun \ə-ˈpin-yən\
: a belief, judgment, or way of thinking about something : what someone thinks about a particular thing
: advice from someone with special knowledge : advice from an expert
: a formal statement by a judge, court, etc., explaining the reasons a decision was made according to laws or rules

Link: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinion

In short, it is my opinion that the 80% usage of the definition of commodity applies to hookers. That is to say they are not commodities because they are not raw goods and not sold as un-unique items on a commodities’ exchange. I am not lying when I say so. I am disagreeing with you. It is not my fault that you really are indeed uneducated and too ignorant and / or stupid to understand the difference between a disagreement and lying. It is also not my fault you are unwilling or unable to admit there are other opinions in the world that differ from your myopic, redneck ideals.

I will entertain commenting to your counter, but that is where I will have to limit it to. I'm not saying I will respond. I am saying I will entertain it, and probably not for the reason you think. That is to say, not to clarify something further that should be perfectly obvious to a reasoning mind.

We are almost there Pet.

I italicized and highlighted the quote(s). There were two quotes and two links....Maybe next time I can put it in color by number form for Olivia. Originally Posted by WTF

They don't show up italicized or highlighted on my iPad...weird. Regardless, it was rather obvious that they weren't your words, like I said.

While I'm making judgments...

WTF should apologize for the Depends comments. Not nice. And a little creepy. Lol.

Olivia was out of line with the uneducated comment. And should apologize for that and the plagiarism accusation.

So ordered.

{{{bangs her gavel}}}

I don't wear panties most days either. And while I have a ton of fancy lingerie, I rarely wear a bra. Originally Posted by LilMynx69

They don't show up italicized or highlighted on my iPad...weird. Regardless, it was rather obvious that they weren't your words, like I said. Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Nor do they on my computer. And if I hadn't followed his obscure links, I'd have never known they were someone else's comments.

Nor do they on my computer. And if I hadn't followed his obscure links, I'd have never known they were someone else's comments. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Since when was a link directly above a quote obscure? You have cataracts along with diarrhea of the fucking mouth?



Originally Posted by WTF
Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni (6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564

Are you stuck in the 1500's? Is that why you are having trouble with knowing wtf a commodity is? You want to adhere to the definition of a commodity from 4-500 years ago. I didn't realize you were that old Olivia. Catch up to the rest of the world girl. Quit using definitions of words from 500 years ago.




http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/

Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties.


http://artcommodity.com/

Art has become heavily commodified. Like the ubiquitous stock market, it has become something that people can invest in and trade.

In short, it is my opinion that the 80% usage of the definition of commodity applies to hookers. . Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

It can be your opinion that 2+2=5 but you would be factually wrong. After being told that 2+2=4 and still trying to convince the world that it is 5 you would be a liar or and idiot.

Which is it?



Art is bought and sold, therefore it is a commodity.

Hookers are someone that useful or valued therefore a commodity.

This is the Merriam Webster definition. It goes on to give five different examples. But the thrust of the definition is the one below. Art is a commodity which you either lied about or are ignorant about, just as you are lying about hookers not being or you are ignorant of that fact.

Again I ask...Which is it. Because factually hookers are commodities just as art is.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commodity
com·mod·i·ty

noun \
: something that is bought and sold
: something or someone that is useful or valued

They don't show up italicized or highlighted on my iPad...weird. Regardless, it was rather obvious that they weren't your words, like I said.

While I'm making judgments...

WTF should apologize for the Depends comments. Not nice. And a little creepy. Lol.

}}} Originally Posted by LilMynx69

My mistake, upon further review....I bolded the quotes but did not italicize them.

I will not apologize for factually stating that Olivia is crapping all over this thread with either outright lies or ignorance beyond repair.

I have shown her numerous times where Merriam Webster clearly states that art and hookers fall under the definition of commodities.

She has started or contributed to many contentious threads about the use of the word whore where she puts down others for using that word and now it is posted at the bottom of her post calling other women whores.

I'm starting a NYMPHO? Thread...
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1055024991

DAMN, this shit is still going! Guess I'll chime in once.

On types of pussy, let Cheech tell you....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3pmwrtlDaY

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
Women can get A man to fuck them for free, but they can’t get hot guys, younger guys or both to fuck them for free


OH, do you seriously believe that? At 19 I was a dark tanned, broad shouldered, athletic, long-haired, six pack ab toting hot guy. I was into older women and they into me. I briefly saw and fucked the 38 year old in the apartment across from mine, almost daily, until her 14 year old daughter came back from staying with her dad and walked in on mom and me going at it. A couple of days later I was in the courtyard, shirtless, teaching a 5 year old how to throw frisbee, when I noticed the hot, 22 year old blonde two doors down checking me out. The next day there was a knock on my door and when I opened it there she was, wanting to borrow sugar. I ended up giving it to her that night and up to five times a day after that. That nymph damn near wore me out. I loved having women hitting on me, instead of the meat market club scene. I ended up fucking myself over by breaking my neck. However, I had a beautiful 23 year old ICU nurse in love with me after a couple of weeks. The feeling was mutual and she'd come up to my room every day after she got off. That lasted over a month, til the hospital found out and she was asked to transfer to another hospital.

Guys today are no different. Fucking a hot MILF is almost like a badge of honor for some guys and they have no problem doing it for free. The difference is more older women get off on fucking young, hot guys now than back in the days before AIDS, and it's more acceptable.

I remember you saying women would never pay for the company of younger men. Wrong again. There are women out there doing exactly what many of the older men do here. Granted, nowhere near the number compared to men, but they're out there nonetheless. Just because you choose not to believe it, it doesn't make it untrue.

As for the other BS in this thread, I'll leave that to the others. They seem to be enjoying it.

The link provided is a proper citation. However, it would have been more obvious to a hurried reader to italicize the words since it is too hard to box quote it online.

Or you could have simply used quotation marks. That said, I could tell it was a quote and do not judge it to be plagiarism.

Case dismissed with prejudice.

{{{bangs her gavel}}}

...
http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/
Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties. Originally Posted by WTF

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Actually, LilMynx banging of the gavel, while funny, is out of turn as you are mistaken in writing that WTF used a proper citation as he clearly did not. However, thank you for providing the actual infraction by WTF as I did not want to look through all the posts. WTF did plagiarize when he used the words found on that blog. The correct format for a quote of a blog according to APA styling can be found here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/.

Since WTF used the following

...
http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/
Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties.
Originally Posted by WTF

a correct citation would have been the following using APA styling:

Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist (2008, February 21), Keep in mind that art only began to become a commodity in the mid-19th century as the artist was freed from feudal ties, Retrieved from http://louisproyect.org/2008/02/21/art-as-commodity/

Whether WTF is foolish, stupid, uneducated or just ignorant is a debatable item, but in this case, he did plagiarize the words of another when he used that other author's words without a correct citation. Using correct citations ensures there is less ambiguity in written communications by accurately attributing the words written to the correct authors. The other format, MLA, can be found here as well: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/.

I have used both of the preceding formats for citations, but I have used the APA style more and I am more accustomed to seeing it used in both Law books as well as the undergraduate and graduate coursework I have done.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Now to address WTF’s BS about what is or is not a commodity. A commodity is defined at more than one location, unlike you seem to think Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.

Merriam-Webster, found here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commodity defines a commodity as
·something that is bought and sold
·something or someone that is useful or valued

The second bullet point, that is italicized and underlined by me to clearly show what is being used by WTF as his basis for his position that hookers are a commodity. Now I find that line of thought laughable in the extreme and very flawed in concept as it shows to me a limited world view as well as a limited vocabulary. That one definition is being taken out of context by WTF since he failed to consider the word against other sources such as Webster's 3rd Edition or the following definition by Dictionary.com found here:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/commodity?s=t

com·mod·i·ty
noun, plural com·mod·i·ties.
1. an article of trade or commerce, especially a product as distinguished from a service.
2. something of use, advantage, or value.
3. Stock Exchange. any unprocessed or partially processed good, as grain, fruits, and vegetables, or precious metals.
4. Obsolete . a quantity of goods.

Clearly, a person is only a commodity if they are property such as slaves were considered, like the blacks from the past of this country. When women got the vote and drivers licenses’, clearly they moved beyond the idea of their being considered chattel. Additionally, their Vagina's cannot be considered a commodity since that is indistinguishability from the female having one.

Never mind.

The citation WTF used is appropriate on a SHMB...the MLA doesn't necessarily apply here...

A casual note on a SHMB only requires that a reader can easily find the corresponding full text. That is accomplished via a link.

He was sloppy in not italicizing the excerpted text, but plagiarism requires a certain amount of intent that I judged he did not possess.

My ruling stands.

{{{bangs her gavel}}}

I wish LM69 would bang my gavel.