The macroeconomics of douchebags.

Kinda got lost somewhere around the time folks started arguing that economic laws don't apply to economic transactions, near as I can tell. (Slothful induction ftw?)

But I'm up for an economic discussion, if we can drag it back to that. Austrian or Keynes? I'll admit I'm more of a von Mises than a Kreugman girl myself, but you do have to get different theories in to get a lively discussion!

Actually, you guys might like a book available on mises.org -- Defending the Undefendable. (Ignore the price--if you click on the PDF, it's free.) Basically an argument for how the Great Scourges (at least, the ones that don't involve theft and violence) of our day are really the result of market distortions rather than inherent sin. Good stuff. I've only read about 8 essays, but they've all been fun.

No. Neither is fudge packer.

So where is the economic theory in this thread? Looks like the OP hijacked his own thread. Originally Posted by pyramider

Oh where is Greenpeace when ya need him???.....
He could clear this all up in one post....

So, exactly how long are you going to wait? I'm curious... Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Well, since it requires no real effort on my part, i can wait forever. Or as long as it takes.

I suspect forever.

Kinda got lost somewhere around the time folks started arguing that economic laws don't apply to economic transactions, near as I can tell. (Slothful induction ftw?)

But I'm up for an economic discussion, if we can drag it back to that. Austrian or Keynes? I'll admit I'm more of a von Mises than a Kreugman girl myself, but you do have to get different theories in to get a lively discussion!

Actually, you guys might like a book available on mises.org -- Defending the Undefendable. (Ignore the price--if you click on the PDF, it's free.) Basically an argument for how the Great Scourges (at least, the ones that don't involve theft and violence) of our day are really the result of market distortions rather than inherent sin. Good stuff. I've only read about 8 essays, but they've all been fun. Originally Posted by Lucyny

This kind of talk gives me a serious chubby coming from you lady. I'd kind of like to show you something indefensible.

I thinck he might be referring micro theory.

What p! No micro taint???.....

What p! No micro taint???..... Originally Posted by Celso

im sure tinkerbell has micro taint,,

im sure tinkerbell has micro taint,, Originally Posted by aj14620

Is fairy taint ok to post?

Is fairy taint ok to post? Originally Posted by amishgangster

only if of age
in a paid ad

Definitely micro. Indefensibly micro.

only if of age
in a paid ad Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

How the fuck do we know if a fairy is of age or not? Cut her in half and count the rings?

now where is that link to a affidavit.
I think it was in alert
hay where did all those named handles go

Well, since it requires no real effort on my part, i can wait forever. Or as long as it takes.

I suspect forever. Originally Posted by Doove

Both of your premises are wrong...

So what else you got? Originally Posted by Wakeuр

You’re absolutely right, Wakeup.

Supply and Demand are irrelevant. The hooks will always charge what the market will bear.

Note to OP: Don't fall asleep in class again when you re-take Economics 101.

I am a little curious what the word "market" means to you if it has nothing to do with supply and demand?

The providers will charge what they can get. What they can get is influenced by what the other providers are getting. When the phone stops ringing, they lower their prices. When they have more business than they can serve, they raise them.

So, how is supply and demand not a factor?