It's not as simple as all that and it's easy to draw some pretty distinct differences between Nazi's and Confederates, not the least of which is that slavery was an institution with a history in the south (and the north) as opposed to the slaughter of the jews which was instituted within a decade of the Nazi's taking power.
But, the analogy of flying the Swastika is a good one. You think jewish folks might be understandably outraged if the capital in Germany was flying the swastika? It's unthinkable. Why should black Americans be any less outraged?
Originally Posted by timpage
Look, it's a great piece of history, I'll give you that.
But that's exactly why it needs to be in a museum, and not a statehouse flag.
I, for one, don't mind Nazi memorabilia in museums.
You can say that slavery was only part of it. For the sake of argument, let's say that it was a very, very minuscule part of it (obviously untrue).
To blacks, however, that's all it will ever be about. Can you honestly say that there is one self-respecting white man who isn't, at the very least, slightly racist, who would want to support the confederate flag?
They know exactly what it is, and exactly what it does. That is why it isn't such a "coincidence" that every titty bar filled with racist rednecks flies the confederate flag.
It's not only offensive to blacks, it should be offensive to whites as well. I don't mean to sound like a hypersensitive hippie, but every time we support or otherwise glorify the confederate flag, we support a way of life that was marked by one of the worst atrocities ever committed.
When has it ever happened that a state or country allows the losing side to still fly their flag? The confederates lost and they should get over it.