How so? My statement was taken way out of context. Originally Posted by blthzr666I wasn't even directing that comment towards all that. I'm just saying...
Oh shit...now my WK tendancies are being pulled to WK for a guy who is being accused of WK-ing......muuuuuuuussssttttt maintaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiin controoooooooooooooooooolllll.Thank you. Very well said.
I don't know about all the details, smoking or not, drinking or alcoholic or whatever....but it certainly seemed the short "negative" post was insulting, bashing, and with purpose other than just to "inform."
I personally also do NOT like when ANY woman on this site gets hit with one of those "obliterate" posts. If the goal is to inform, plenty have shown how to provide negative feedback in an informing, and not "shaming" way.
- Peace and Love, peace and love. Originally Posted by newd
Once a provider and a client get into a relationship, and it goes bad, it should be brought out. I think it is valuable info to be able to decide whether to see a provider or not.
This would not be the first time that this kind of situation has been brought out, and from both sides.
As far as personal attacks, that is a two way street. Just as many providers attack innocent clients, as the other way around. One of the issues people have with WK's is that they refuse to see that simple fact.
Mr. Blthzr666 better remove his blinders, because the wheel will turn, and he soon might find himself thrown under the bus by the very provider he WK's.....
And, speaking out if both sides of his mouth, he sure descended into a personal attack.......
elg...... Originally Posted by elghund
Once a provider and a client get into a relationship, and it goes bad, it should be brought out. I think it is valuable info to be able to decide whether to see a provider or not.
This would not be the first time that this kind of situation has been brought out, and from both sides.
As far as personal attacks, that is a two way street. Just as many providers attack innocent clients, as the other way around. One of the issues people have with WK's is that they refuse to see that simple fact.
Mr. Blthzr666 better remove his blinders, because the wheel will turn, and he soon might find himself thrown under the bus by the very provider he WK's.....
And, speaking out if both sides of his mouth, he sure descended into a personal attack.......
elg...... Originally Posted by elghund
You make me laugh sometimes osd. The last post was very entertaining.awesome
In a good way.
Honestly what does her smoking status have anything to do with this? She smokes, maybe more than she should, but who am I to judge, it's her life! Originally Posted by rodeomann22it was part of the post said to be bashing her. that I asked to be quoted and was.
it was part of the post said to be bashing her.I think was more upset that he called her fat than the smoking part, idl though, 666, care to chime in on this one?
I went after each bit of it
And that as I stated she can keep smoking
and get someone to post in review non-smoker
why go after the bashing if you go for something easy and make non issue but still smoking. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
I think was more upset that he called her fat than the smoking part, idl though, 666, care to chime in on this one?"Fat" was my issue. It's no better than calling someone stupid or ugly, it's demeaning. She states she smokes, so you know it before hand anyway.
But I understand your side osd as well, just think the entire post in general was NOT needed, but hey, too late for that now isn't it, and has def sparked a nice debate about bashing Originally Posted by rodeomann22
Are you actually saying I've been misunderstood osd? Because it wouldn't be the 1st time. My communication skills can suck now and then! Originally Posted by blthzr666nope not at all