America: #1 globally in mass shootings

Most shooting don't show blood? Most news cast may not show areas where's there's blood and they typically don't show a body either. You also have to consider the angle they are filming and time of day. But this shooting in Virginia was filmed up close as it happened. Do you think shooting victims typically run off after being shot less than ten feet away? I wouldn't think so. Besides that we don't know where she ended up.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Shooting victims are frequently able to ambulate. Shit, if that 9mm was loaded with FMJ, being able to move around after being hit would be the norm, rather than the exception, unless there is some sort of CNS hit or a bone broken in hips or legs. I would think that somebody that had seen as much as you claim to have seen would know that.

I haven't really been following this thread....you truly believe this shooting incident was staged/faked?

Were the cops in on it too when they cornered the shooter and he blew his brains out? Where are the cameraman and the reporter? Did they board a Malaysian Air 777 which subsequently landed at Area 51?

What are you? Some kind of fucking nut?

Shooting victims are frequently able to ambulate. Shit, if that 9mm was loaded with FMJ, being able to move around after being hit would be the norm, rather than the exception, unless there is some sort of CNS hit or a bone broken in hips or legs. I would think that somebody that had seen as much as you claim to have seen would know that.

I haven't really been following this thread....you truly believe this shooting incident was staged/faked?

Were the cops in on it too when they cornered the shooter and he blew his brains out? Where are the cameraman and the reporter? Did they board a Malaysian Air 777 which subsequently landed at Area 51?

What are you? Some kind of fucking nut? Originally Posted by timpage

What experiences do you have where a shooting victim is shot at close range and is able to run off? I would say she could have ran off like that if she was shot in the hand or some other non vital area or the shots were missed all together. But she must have been hit in a vital area such as center mass if she was said to have expired on the scene. We also don't know how far she ran and where she was found.

Jim

What experiences do you have where a shooting victim is shot at close range and is able to run off? I would say she could have ran off like that if she was shot in the hand or some other non vital area or the shots were missed all together. But she must have been hit in a vital area such as center mass if she was said to have expired on the scene. We also don't know how far she ran and where she was found.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

We didn't see the entire incident either. You're only going on the part we saw.

We didn't see the entire incident either. You're only going on the part we saw. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Right we all saw the same thing. My perspective of what transpires afterward is what prompts me to believe this incident has all the criteria of a psyop. Immediately we hear talk of gun control and specifically those that are mentally ill obtaining guns. We heard this during Sandy Hook about Adam Lanza, Santa Barbara with Elliot Rodgers, Charleston Church Shooting with Dylann Roof and now the Virginia shooting with Vester Flannigan. I see a rather unusual pattern here. I know there are a lot of people who share the same suspicions. The clip below explains it quite well.

Jim

https://youtu.be/9es3KDg8OAg

Right we all saw the same thing. My perspective of what transpires afterward is what prompts me to believe this incident has all the criteria of a psyop. Immediately we hear talk of gun control and specifically those that are mentally ill obtaining guns. We heard this during Sandy Hook about Adam Lanza, Santa Barbara with Elliot Rodgers, Charleston Church Shooting with Dylann Roof and now the Virginia shooting with Vester Flannigan. I see a rather unusual pattern here. I know there are a lot of people who share the same suspicions. The clip below explains it quite well.

Jim

https://youtu.be/9es3KDg8OAg Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

What do you THINK we are going to hear after two people are fucking killed on live television? That's not unusual. I think there are a lot of people who share the same crazy. That's about it.

What do you THINK we are going to hear after two people are fucking killed on live television? That's not unusual. I think there are a lot of people who share the same crazy. That's about it. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Ok, whatever. How about we wait till the next shooting incident occurs. We shouldn't have to wait long either I'll predict you'll hear the same thing. Mental illness, gun control ect. ect.


Jim

Ok, whatever. How about we wait till the next shooting incident occurs. We shouldn't have to wait long either I'll predict you'll hear the same thing. Mental illness, gun control ect. ect.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Then we will put you down as a advocate for arming the mentally ill jim.

Then we will put you down as a advocate for arming the mentally ill jim. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Hahaha, ok you do that, you stupid fucker.


Jim

Hahaha, ok you do that, you stupid fucker.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Had a nice service for Adam Ward, while you were tubing the dnile.

Had a nice service for Adam Ward, while you were tubing the dnile. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Nothing in the videos ever substantiated that Adam Ward was even shot. But yet we are lead to believe he was because he dropped his camera. But there was a security camera caught on Flanagan's camera as he was walking up towards the interview. That's footage that will never bee shown.

Jim

Ok, whatever. How about we wait till the next shooting incident occurs. We shouldn't have to wait long either I'll predict you'll hear the same thing. Mental illness, gun control ect. ect.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

What else should we hear? When someone kills multiple people, they're not right in the head. Why can't it just be the truth? Why does it have to be some vast conspiracy? Again, this goes back to the random nature of the world and your inability to deal with it mentally, so you construct these conspiracies in order to explain these shootings. They couldn't possible be just random crazy people who get hold of a gun and kill people. No, it must be a conspiracy.

Nothing in the videos ever substantiated that Adam Ward was even shot. But yet we are lead to believe he was because he dropped his camera. But there was a security camera caught on Flanagan's camera as he was walking up towards the interview. That's footage that will never bee shown.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

I'd like you to confront his parents about it. Maybe they'd like to hear your story. If he's not dead, where is he? He chose to leave his family forever and live on some deserted island, wtf?

Listen to what you're saying.

Right we all saw the same thing. My perspective of what transpires afterward is what prompts me to believe this incident has all the criteria of a psyop. Immediately we hear talk of gun control and specifically those that are mentally ill obtaining guns. We heard this during Sandy Hook about Adam Lanza, Santa Barbara with Elliot Rodgers, Charleston Church Shooting with Dylann Roof and now the Virginia shooting with Vester Flannigan. I see a rather unusual pattern here. I know there are a lot of people who share the same suspicions. The clip below explains it quite well.

Jim

https://youtu.be/9es3KDg8OAg Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

You are a fucking nutcase, whiteboy

I'd like you to confront his parents about it. Maybe they'd like to hear your story. If he's not dead, where is he? He chose to leave his family forever and live on some deserted island, wtf?

Listen to what you're saying. Originally Posted by WombRaider

No, I doubt he's living on a deserted island.


Jim

No, I doubt he's living on a deserted island.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Just think about what you're saying entails. It means that they were in on it, the police, the people in the news station, the local officials, they were all in on it and all are keeping this lie. That's complete bullshit. Are you telling me in this day and age where cellphones are everywhere, they are keeping this huge secret? Not to mention, the two dead victims leave their families forever? For what? It just doesn't add up. It's much more LIKELY, that this guy was a disgruntled former employee who had a chip on his shoulder and was determined to get the attention he felt he never got and this was how he chose to do it.

Have you ever heard of Occam's Razor? That solution which has the fewest assumptions is usually the best one. Your theory calls for a shitload of assumptions. It just doesn't add up.