Fancy's BAN was prior to nTG's (newTG) by a week maybe 2. I heard from the grapevine and the grape, but out of respect I won't repeat anything that isn't already in public forum. FYI TG, the term potty mouthed whore usually refers to one who plays fast and loose with someone's RW info.Someone is keeping up.
Chain of events and possible causes.
Fancy was BANNED, TG posts the BAN was for a year. The only thing that comes to mind that brings a year BAN is potty mouth related. This is of atomic proportions and things need to be corralled quickly. Everyone that's been in contact with Fancy is now radioactive until cleared. Contain, Clean, Release. Seeing And reviewing Fancy put you on the radar, reviewing another radioactive whore put you in their sights and shot you down.
Like the hippo said, this was done at the admin level and I'm pretty sure it was done "by the books". Once your name was cleared you got the stamp of approval from the powers that be and you're back to chasing tail without missing a single session.
As an educational element, I'm also going to post this series of events in the Ban-a-Palooza thread. Originally Posted by H.Hardhat
Someone is keeping up.I don't keep all my PMs, but I think it was Hardhat that steered me to see Fancy for my first appointment, and I don't remember who that steered me to Alyssa.
Now remember this HH, OJ Simpson was cleared of murder but eventually wound up where he deserved.
TG has sure put himself in some interesting positions in his short time here, wouldn't you say? Originally Posted by WTF
.but a week later I e-mailed St.Christopher my story, and two hours later DeD e-mailed me that I was unbanned.First , thank you for the cordial reply. It was very informative. Somebody should get some ice for DeD's nuts!
Now - I can't prove that I'm not Fancy's employee, but I've only written one review of her. And...it wasn't a PSE review, it was a "we hung out all day and went to the movies and gossiped" review. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman
.Again , it throws a flag into her discretion. She is probably is as innocent as the day is long but the jail is full of innocent folks, if you do not believe me, just ask them.
Like I said - collateral damage. I've never done anything wrong - even when I logged in from Fancy's incall, there was nothing that couldn't be seen by the world wide web - I had no premium accesses, and didn't know they existed. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman
Some of the admins used to be local moderators if that's what you're getting at,.... Originally Posted by SpiceItUpI'm trying to get at the truth.
....but the entire admin team was involved in the process just like the entire local mod team is involved the deliberation and discussion regarding any locally handled ban. Originally Posted by SpiceItUpPlease, let's not kid ourselves.
I'm trying to get at the truth.Alright, but I'm just saying I personally saw no fewer than 4 admins chime in on the discussion, and that doesn't include whatever discussions happened in the admin area I have no access to.
Please, let's not kid ourselves.
Thanks a lot, TG, for the addendum. Things are becoming a lot clearer now. Originally Posted by Sarunga
....That's good because I filed a complaint about the 5 "thread hijack" points i got for directly replying to an op insulting me.
It's not perfect but if a mistake is made we do try to correct it as soon as possible, and there is a mechanism in place for determining that and then doing so.
..... Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
That's good because I filed a complaint about the 5 "thread hijack" points i got for directly replying to an op insulting me. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotterLol, point taken!
Am i to understand that a dickless Mod can best work his penis envy out on a fuctard under the "hijacking treads" guise?
Further, there are certain gray areas of the guidelines where moderator interpretation and discretion are a larger factor than others. Hijacking happens to be one of those. Not all of the moderator staff share my philosophy on hijacking but for the record I voted to reverse those points of yours.[/I][/COLOR] Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
Honestly it wasn't gossip about specific people because I didn't know anyone. I still really don't. Back in those days (*chuckle - 3-4 months ago*) I was mostly unsure about what I was allowed to say, or ask, or to whom, or what secret codewords I was supposed to use.
Next do you see where many folks could see those^^ words to be, if not alarming at least the start to a ringing bell? Because you were interested in eccie , many would assume the gossip centered on eccie. That throws up an alarm in Fancy's direction as to her discretion....
Originally Posted by WTF
Don't take this the wrong way....but your review suggest otherwise.
I hope no one takes this the wrong way, but I'm not interested in gossiping about individual people because I simply don't care. * Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman
Don't take this the wrong way....but your review suggest otherwise.Funny thing is....it is amazing that I stayed off of that review. Y'all know I fly the flag and bump-for-mouthfoam. But I stayed clear of that one.
..... Originally Posted by WTF
.......your review. ..put you on the radar. Originally Posted by WTFOr, it just could be a coincidence that every 3 months adminTards run a query of MAC addresses, IP addresses....and what nots looking for offenders. And .....just......so happened......to bump in to nTG.