Fancy News!

But Lexie in fact did open this can of worms. So you can thank her for that....you can not have it both ways. " Thank you Lexie and fuck everyone else for speculating..." It does not work like that.


. Originally Posted by WTF

very true..............

I thought she talked to Lexie and not everyone else, so I can see how that would work.... You men, always ASSume much...
And we're women, we have shit however we want it, at times lol
The rest of the times, we "allow" you to thinck it's going "your way."
Ha!
Keep thincking...

I thought she talked to Lexie and not everyone else, so I can see how that would work.... You men, always ASSume much...
And we're women, we have shit however we want it, at times lol
The rest of the times, we "allow" you to thinck it's going "your way."
Ha!
Keep thincking... Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Yes she talked to Lexie and did not tell her to STFU.

Fancy is just as responsible for this stupid ass thread as Lexie.

Just like Fancy is responsible for coming on here and posting a long ass explanation that basically admitted to outing a MoFo in infoshare and being banned for one year but because all you ladies have been outing personal information in infoshare for so long without any of you ever getting in trouble, they reduced the ban to one month and cleared up the rules in infoshare for y'all to quit doing that.

The long windedness has fooled you and others into thinking she actually did not out personal information.

Bottom line, Lexie was foolish to start this thread and Fancy was foolish for approving of her doing so.

And...You keep thinking it is cute to parrot writing thincking.

And it just pisses you off, don't it?

You keep beating a dead horse.
If Fancy DID out someone; would she be back so soon?
Would the mods let her back in after a month?
Truly? If she were as malicious as you keep ascertaining?


I would chalk it up more like.... everyone was speeding on the highway, to maintain the current speed of traffic, Fancy stayed in her lane, maintaing the same speed as everyone else.... and yet.... she is the one who got popped. There weren't legible SPEED LIMIT signs; But NOW there are.
The shit is done.

You guys keep trying to rewind shit, looking for more action, where there is none.

And I can write Thinck if I wanna....

Thinck..... You got a linck..... This ship will not sinck.... I need a drinck....
Heh.
Thancks.

If it's aggravating to see ME type it, imagine how it is when there's another 100 posts up here with that same over-trended intentional misspelling.... That is all led back to troll-like behavior of still beating the dead horse over another long-gone from Eccie non-spelling ass hooktard... And you think I am redundant? Guess you don't see my point.
Imagine that.
If it's aggravating for you, imagine how it is for me.

But again, tell me how I don't understand.
Illuminate me...

Maybe Foxy thincks what Fancy did was ok

I would chalk it up more like.... everyone was speeding on the highway, to maintain the current speed of traffic, Fancy stayed in her lane, maintaing the same speed as everyone else.... and yet.... she is the one who got popped. There weren't legible SPEED LIMIT signs; But NOW there are.
The shit is done. Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Foxy appears to be saying that all the ladies have been outing guys in Infoshare.

But again, tell me how I don't understand.
Illuminate me... Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Fancy got popped for outing personal information in infoshare.

She said the ban was reduced from a year to a month because you all were doing it. You now confirm that all you were outing our personal information in infoshare.

Is that illuminating enough for you?

All you ladies were speeding right next to a elementary school but you defense was that the speed limit sign was not in it's proper place? WTF? How about having the decency and common sense not to do that! Not having to be told not to out folks anywhere.

My argument is that you should not have to be told not to out a fucking guys personal information. Not when you are having coffee with your hooker friends but especially in a place where all ladies can see. But if you think it makes Fancy and the rest of you ladies look good to come on here and admit that you all have been outing gents personal information in infoshare....then by all means, continue to do so.

Foxy appears to be saying that all the ladies have been outing guys in Infoshare. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Yes , she and Fancy are trying to throw all ladies in infoshare under the bus. My guess is some ladies have been doing so...others not. The one's that had the good sense not to , are now being lumped into the potty mouth whore line.

It is always amazing how folks think a cover up to a fuck up is better served than just admitting the actual fuck up.

I don't think OUTING is right.
I never said it was right.
I wish I could share my protest thread from the ladies room.
Not just over Fancy's ban; But much over lack of consistency.

Pretty fuckin hard to "obey the speed limit" when you don't know what the precise limit is, right?

And FYI, I don't agree with outing, but on Eccie; Outing can be as simple and as easy of a mistake as writing one word.

Example:
"Hey John."

See, I am sure someone named John, or someone who knows a man named John may very well try to RTM my post.
And that is not what I would define as a malicious outing.
There can be accidental outings; Another example is if a provider wrote a warning incorrectly. And accidentally wrote too many letters versus asterisks.
But now we have EXAMPLES and a template to follow;
So there may be NO CONFUSION.
Properly masking all information will prevent outing;
And there were no guidelines before.
We were told to "make sure you mask."
But what was masking defined as?
It was not.
There were NO GUIDELINES previously in the ladies area.

I am curious....
Do you men really think that ECCIE is the end-all-be-all of where your real life information is shared?
You do realize there are blacklists?
You do realize there are screening services?
You do realize that HOOKERS usually share this information when SOMETHING BAD HAPPENS TO THEM?

Ok, pot, meet kettles.

Just to clarify where I stand on this....
I don't like subterfuge;
So I am speaking painfully clear without any song & dance...

Only YOU can protect your information;
It would be wise to do so.
It would also be in a man's best interest when he proceeds as a client to behave as a well mannered one...
You don't expect the gloves to not come off when hookers are done wrong or suffer abuse, do you?

Now aside from alerts/blacklists.... with that being said, yes, there are MALICIOUS bat-shit-cray-cray vicious hookers, just like there are vicious "clients"- (fucktards, however...) and people will out other people.
Example: Gamy & Wreckshop.
Hooktard.
Fucktard. (Psycho.)


Both outing. Both wrong.

As were any of the ladies who failed to mask properly; Albeit there was no guideline to follow THEN.
There is NOW.

Outing is outing, and no, noone wants their information blasted, in whole or in part, or even a First name; However up until this little fiasco, it was DONE.
Numerous times.
Yes, it was.
Am I throwing Infoshare under the bus and all the ladies in the bus with it?
If my being honest is doing that, then YES.
I can admit when I am wrong or see wrong doing; Although, I never shared a name in infoshare. I did share.... an email... OMG....
Other than wreckshop's link to his profile page & the email address the outing info was sent from... to me.
(That's what happens when you send REAL WORLD INFO TO MY DAMN INBOX!)
I followed the proper procedures; contacting the victim(S) and mods.
Then made an alert.

But dammnnit...
Maybe I should go back & check my alert...
I may be an outing bitch too, if I didn't "mask" his email properly....
Ah hell..(Too late to edit now!)..... Wait, wait.
That was before the guideline! WHEW!
What a relief!
Guess it's "all good."

You want a bone to chew on, chew on that.

What appears to be being said by several sources is that it has been going on for a long time.
The question then should be, Why? Why would modtards allow that to go on for so long and finally drop a sudden hammer?
If you could get the answer to that question and the ensuing follow up questions an honest answer would bring, there would be a much better understanding of the systemic problem. The issue at hand is a symptom of a greater problem. Fucktards focusing on this either can't see the bigger picture or are part of it.

Forest and trees...

I wonder when Pete, Spice, DeD and dh will get their free pussy from Fancy that Hitler arranged for them.

We want reviews...

I want me one of them St.C pardons.......don't make me fuck the potty mouth whore......pleeeeeeeeaaaaaasss sseeeee

I want me one of them St.C pardons.......don't make me fuck the potty mouth whore......pleeeeeeeeaaaaaasss sseeeee Originally Posted by dearhunter

But... but.... why would YOU need a pardon?

You NEVER do anything unethical dearhunter....

Excuse me........fucking Fancy would be punishment akin to a year ban.........fucking you would be about a month.......ijs

What appears to be being said by several sources is that it has been going on for a long time.
The question then should be, Why? Why would modtards allow that to go on for so long and finally drop a sudden hammer?
... Originally Posted by boardman

Probably the same reason they dropped the hammer on outing or threats of outing off site. The rules were murky...

Once the owner was made aware of it, it sounds like he put a stop to it.

Are you making the case that one set of murky rules got a outing ban reduced from a year to a month and the other set of murky rules did not?