Recorded Sessions?

.....

Since everyone is speculating it is highly likely that the officer in WTF"s scenario out of the Houston Chronicle to support his legal advice for all the providers to audio record their "clients" ... was NO BILLED by the Grand Jury because the crafty little prostitute was unable to get her "recording" admitted into evidence. These anecdotal examples form no basis for "legal advice."

! Originally Posted by LexusLover

The charges were dropped on the provider exactly because she did record her client ( who happened to be a Vice Officer) saying “Well, you did, you know you did, I know you did. There's no audio, there's no video. It's gonna be my word against yours and who do you think they're going to believe?”

http://www.chron.com/news/article/Vi...ng-1706763.php
The woman, whose prostitution charges have been dropped, protested being arrested for offering sex in exchange for money.
On tape, the officer can be heard saying, “Well, you did, you know you did, I know you did. There's no audio, there's no video. It's gonna be my word against yours and who do you think they're going to believe?” according to court records.

.....

These anecdotal examples form no basis for "legal advice."
Originally Posted by LexusLover

So what are you trying to say LL? Are you giving legal advice not to audio record? I'm not giving legal advice. I'm saying what happened in this case. The provider audio recorded and because she did and because she did not agree to a service for fee , her charges were dropped. I'm saying I would record the initial start of a session.

.....

But it is nice to know that WTF is ADVOCATING recording hobby sessions! Originally Posted by LexusLover

I would audio record if I was a provider. I also would never agree to a fee for service.

.....

was NO BILLED by the Grand Jury because the crafty little prostitute was unable to get her "recording" admitted into evidence.
! Originally Posted by LexusLover

What do you have against Crafty little prostitutes?....you sound as if you are pissed the officer was arrested and the crafty little prostitutes charges were dropped.

Ha Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

Once again demonstrating your knowledge or lack thereof, of the legal system.

It was not against the law for the provider to audio record the private encounter. ( You seem to think it is against the law) Because she was crafty enough to record the private encounter and get it on audio where it clearly demonstrated that she did not agree to what she was charged to agreeing to, her charges were dropped.

I will not go into why the officers was no billed but the fact of the matter is that the providers charges were dropped because she audio recorded her encounter(s) , one of which happened to be with a Vice Officer and because so, her charges were dropped.

LL is trying to cloud that fact , with the separate issue of the officer's being no billed.

I will not go into why the officers was no billed Originally Posted by WTF

... like you actually knows why them officerS was no billed?

The extent of your knowledge of the "legal system" was painfully (to you) revealed by the verdict in the Zimmerman trial over the death of Martin after you ran all over the board shooting off your loud mouth about how Zimmerman was going to get convicted of "SOMETHING"!

Quit pretending .... someone might actually be dumb enough to believe you!

Let's see: You are the one advocating the providers to record the hobbyists, right?

... like you actually knows why them officerS was no billed? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I know why the provider had her charge dropped. It was because she did not agree to service for fee and she audio recorded.

Were i a provider, that is exactly wtf I'd not do and do. I would not agree to a service for fee and i would audio record that fact.

Now do you have a problem with the crafty little prostitute as you called her...having her charges dropped? Are you aganist crafty little prostitutes? You act as if you are cheering the Vice officer and damning the crafty little prostitute. Why is that?

And like i said , i will not go into the reason why the officer was no billed.

The extent of your knowledge of the "legal system" was painfully (to you) revealed by the verdict in the Zimmerman trial over the death of Martin after you ran all over the board shooting off your loud mouth about how Zimmerman was going to get convicted of "SOMETHING"!
E] Originally Posted by LexusLover

Making a prediction on the Zimmerman trial is what a whole gaggle of legal experts did before and during the trial on TV. Some proved correct....some not. That i agreed with the one's who got it wrong...are they not qualified to be legal experts?

You bring up the stupidest shit to try and advance your point.

For example a thread in which i had spoken about audio recordings....you bring up video and photographic recording and then in you sick twisted convoluted way try and mix the two different readings as one.

Why would i hate Moxy? All she did was post one thing on the board and post the opposite on her showcase...it just took her a while to figure out how silly that was! Originally Posted by WTF

You are so sweet to think of me so much that will do anything for my undivided attention... I am sorry I've been ignoring the (one of the 2) person that gives me free press everywhere he goes. Thank you for your kind support! It is greatly appreciated! Please let me know what I've put in my showcase that contradicts what I am about... Or you don't have to, it's actually okay. Maybe you're talking in regards to my new signature line below?VVVVVVVVVVVVV??? Did you want me to add both your names to that, ? Just so you won't feel as if I'm excluding you from my life? I understand the need for my attention as I KNOW I'm pretty good at making a man feel better than the Queen of England....
I'm not sure who you love more now and that makes me quite jeleous, I must admit... But in the end, I just have to understand that I can't be one of the best in this beautiful city I call home! Natalia Mori, what do you think??? Maybe we should get together and "record" our session (girls ONLY,no boys allowed)to let the public vote and maybe that'll help WTFART figure out which one of us he likes or loves to give free press to??? He seems to be split between the both of us, I will understand either way if you or I win but honestly I'm pretty sure we'd cause a turmoil of disagreements lol! I've heard you're pretty good at what you do! You must be just like me! You enjoy EVERY second of making a man feel like a KING...
Recording a session without the second party's consent is wrong in my books, but then again, some people are just too sick in the head to accept it... I do t care what is legal or not in regards to an audio recording but in my books, if you didn't ask and still did it without my permission, you're SICK! Also, you need some help! *Moxie*

Recording a session without the second party's consent is wrong in my books, but then again, some people are just too sick in the head to accept it... I do t care what is legal or not in regards to an audio recording but in my books, if you didn't ask and still did it without my permission, you're SICK! Also, you need some help! *Moxie* Originally Posted by LadyMoxie

Not sure if you have noticed or not but i have yet to give a fuck what you think. If you weren't starving for attention, you'd stop replying.

Please let me know what a Vice officer thinks about your opinion of audio recordings and the law.

My mom and dad tried to buy me the same shot too. Unfortunately, they were shot to death in front of me outside the opera. Originally Posted by junglemonkey

HAHA Damn man... You win the thread.

or example a thread in which i had spoken about audio recordings....you bring up video and photographic recording and then in you sick twisted convoluted way try and mix the two different readings as one. Originally Posted by WTF

Dear Little Boy .... #1 ... the mention of video/spy cams was brought up before I began posting about "recording" sessions. #2 ... Fortunately the World (this one and the real one) doesn't revolve around YOU! #3 ... YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT FROM SHINOLA ABOUT PRACTICING CRIMINAL LAW. #4 .. Your LAMEASS attempt to paint me as "LE" with your slimy, ignorant innuendos shows the depths of your classlessness and ugliness, when anybody on this board who knows me or knows of me recognizes I am not LE.

You are the one who has advocated (and still are) providers recording sessions "for their own protection" ... and you give a news report in the Houston Chronicle as the basis for your LEGAL ADVICE for providers to do so.

From that it can easily be PRESUMED that you advocate HOBBYISTS recording their sessions with PROVIDERS .... and therefore you support what PAPPI was doing, since he asserts he was doing so "for his own protection."

When the authors of the Bill of Rights got finished with the Fourth Amendment they crafted the Fifth Amendment just for Little Boys like you. Then they crafted the Sixth Amendment to assure that Little Boys like you that can't keep their ignorant mouths shut would be guarantied a lawyer.

You are obviously not a lawyer. You should not be practicing law by giving legal advice. In Texas practicing law without a license is a serious matter, not only for the unwary consumers of the advice, but also the community as a whole. Contrary to YOUR CHARACTERIZATION of what you are doing it is "practicing law" when you give someone advice concerning their "legal rights"!

You've made your posts about you. Your over-inflated responses reflect your lack of self-esteem and desire to appear intellectually superior to others in an effort, apparently, to overcome your own deficiencies as a person.

Unless you want to put your money where your mouth is ... with either professional liability insurance for legal malpractice or a slush defense fund for the providers who are actually dumb enough to take your advice, then you should probably go sit on the bench and keep quiet. 5th Amendment. But you won't.

My RECOMMENDATION to providers and hobbyists alike is they spend a few bucks (about the cost of one session) on a lawyer referred by the Houston Bar Association referral service (not some other similarly situated person) as having special knowledge in the area of surreptitious video/audio recordings as it relates to criminal law and civil liability and meet with that "expert" and discuss the matter in depth. The conversation will be privileged and therefore remain private and protected. General suggestion: Request a fee contract with the attorney spelling out the expense and scope of the employment and retain a fully signed copy.

:
Originally Posted by Asianhobbyist View Post
First time ever that I have heard someone record a transaction with a whore.

I have heard of guys secretly videotaping sessions, or of providers/establishments secretly taping sessions too for security and whatnot.

:
Originally Posted by Trey View Post
I doubt it. If you really want to do it there are plenty of apps out there to secretly record voice or video on your phone and just looking at a phone you wouldn't know. Also plenty of spy cams cheap on eBay. Anyone could be up to it. I doubt if he gets any more dates they will let his phone stay in the room with him.

:Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Now you know one reason I don't do reviews. See dearhunter's comment.

I've seen a towel or garment dropped over my phone, but I have noticed too many laptops turned on with the screen facing the room.That's a walk.

[QUOTE]Originally Posted by Houston Katrina View Post
Thanks for the information and heads up guys. I would be extremely pissed if someone recorded me without my permission. That is why I ask all guys to leave there laptops/tablets/and most phones in the other room. I might even "accidentally" throw my robe over it.

So what would you have done with the recording?

If she said she would give bbbj but you got covered...

How would the purpose of the video help? Originally Posted by Champagne Brown

For example a thread in which i had spoken about audio recordings....you bring up video and photographic recording and then in you sick twisted convoluted way try and mix the two different readings as one. Originally Posted by WTF

Little Boy as you can see from the above quotes, which I posted in a response to Pistolero claiming "we" are only talking about "audio" ... And as I suggested to Pistolero the above reference to posts was only about 25% of the thread from the beginning.

.. along with CB's comment about VIDEO ...

It doesn't matter to me whether you are advocating audio, video, or a combination of the two recording of sessions, providers or hobbyists, I believe it is WRONG ....

.... YOU APPARENTLY DON'T. You live with your opinion. I'll live with mine.

Sometimes bottom feeders like you snap at anything they see ... which is why they are often called "junk fish"!

Some others are called Defendants.

This thing is still going?

Dear Little Boy .... #1 ... the mention of video/spy cams was brought up before I began posting about "recording" sessions. #2 ... Fortunately the World (this one and the real one) doesn't revolve around YOU! #3 ... YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT FROM SHINOLA ABOUT PRACTICING CRIMINAL LAW. #4 .. Your LAMEASS attempt to paint me as "LE" with your slimy, ignorant innuendos shows the depths of your classlessness and ugliness, when anybody on this board who knows me or knows of me recognizes I am not LE.
. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I asked why it seemed that you were defending the Vice Officer and putting down the provider who audio recorded her conversation with him where he asked her who a jury would believe , her or him.

That audio got her charges dropped, if you do not believe me, contact her lawyer.

If you think that constitutes me saying you are LE. we have differing opinions.

You are obviously not a lawyer. I never said I was. Are you saying you are, you are giving legal advice to see a lawyer and discount my advice? Hypocrite much? You should not be practicing law by giving legal advice. Again, I'm not a lawyer. I am giving my opinion. In Texas practicing law without a license is a serious matter, not only for the unwary consumers of the advice, but also the community as a whole. Contrary to YOUR CHARACTERIZATION of what you are doing it is "practicing law" when you give someone advice concerning their "legal rights"! So let me get this straight , you think I can be charged for giving legal advice on a Whore Board?
Originally Posted by LexusLover

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1539438&page=6

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I tried the Black Cherry concentrate and it had some interesting results. The pain in my feet, knees, and one hip has been reduced from a local sharp pain to a lesser general pain in my legs. It is a more comfortable pain and may get better. Was this caused by the juice? Thanks for the suggestion though.


Originally Posted by LexusLover
More than likely. But keep it up ... daily. It will get even better. When you don't consume the Black Cherry (unsweetened) for 2-3 days you will feel the discomfort returning. When I travel I try to find some if I'm going to be in a place for a few days. It only costs about $5 a 32 oz bottle, which is worth it.

The Black Cherry contains "anti-inflammatory" properties. If you live in an area where they are grown so you can get them ripened you can eat 5-6 a day and get the same result. But that is a "seasonal" solution.

I just take mine daily with my vitamin supplements.

What about you giving Medical Advice to JD concerning his diabetes? Do you consider yourself a Doctor too?

Let me repeat this one legal nugget ...In Texas , it is legal to audio record these private encounters. My advice is that if you are concerned about someone lying about what was said during these encounters...is to audio tape them, which is legal in Texas. I would say that pertains to ladies moreso but not limited to. Are you now saying you are going to arrest me for posting that? Is that how desperate you have become? To actually try and convince me that it is against the law to give one's opinion/advice on a Whore Board?



.

Unless you want to put your money where your mouth is ... with either professional liability insurance for legal malpractice or a slush defense fund for the providers who are actually dumb enough to take your advice, then you should probably go sit on the bench and keep quiet. 5th Amendment. But you won't. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I get an A+!

I get an A+! Originally Posted by LexusLover

In the Dumbass Department.

Congrats.

This thing is still going? Originally Posted by Wakeup

My audio is on a continuous loop