You are really getting a nasty mouth on you, cunt. shouldn't you be somewhere kissing Trumps ass?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/11...sing-rate.html
		Originally Posted by i'va biggen
			
		
	
well. you must have had your dentures sent back from Denver via FedEx overnight. why else you would be able to suck dick 
and talk shit out yer ass at the same time? 
it's too bad you have me on ignore you cocksucker,. no matter ,, once i post this MrMojo and IFFY and gnadfly will re post it as a quote so unless you want to wear a blindfold .. you'll see it anyway. you might learn something about the 
true nature of things you old piece of shit
you'll LOVE this first one cocksucker .. it's from the HuffPost .. that Bastian of liberalism you love so much! 
Enjoy, Chimp.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-s...b_8920048.html
The Real Climate Change Hoax
  John Sanbonmatsu Writer, philosopher, and magician.
As a performing magician, I naturally take a keen interest in deception.   So it was also with a professional, not merely personal, interest that  I watched the spectacular fraud perpetrated on the world’s public in  Paris last month, as political leaders from nearly 200 nations signed  the first universal treaty to limit the carbon gases causing global  warming.  
Politicians described the agreement in triumphal terms, as a “turning  point” in history.  Humanity had dodged a bullet, they said.  Now, we  could all breathe easier.  “Climate justice has won & we are all  working towards a greener future,” as 
President Modi of India put it in a Tweet.
In reality, the happy talk by elites in Paris resembled a skilled  magician’s use of patter to misdirect his audience, only on a global  scale.  A top stage illusionist like David Copperfield can make a  Lamborghini vanish right under the noses of his audience.  But that is  nothing compared to what played in Paris, where the world’s political  elites made the global warming crisis itself disappear — by creating the  illusion of decisive action, where in fact there was nothing.
Ostensibly, the Paris agreement commits its signatories to hold warming  of the earth’s atmosphere to 1.5% degrees Celsius above preindustrial  levels.  But as 
Bill McKibben recently pointed out,  even if the signatories stay true to their promises — and the agreement  has no enforcement mechanism to ensure that they do — the earth’s  atmosphere is still expected to warm to at least 6.3 degrees Fahrenheit  above preindustrial levels.  
How bad would that be?  Consider that today we are at just one degree  Celsius, or about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.   That one degree has already melted many of the world’s glaciers, turned  the North Pole into a temperate zone, and produced droughts, floods, and  wildfires of Biblical proportions across the globe.  One degree has  radically increased the acidity of the world’s oceans — by 30% — and  imperiled the planet’s fresh water resources.
Here in Boston, I spent a surreal Christmas Eve bicycling around my  neighborhood clad in jeans and a T-shirt.  It was the same story  throughout much of the US, where 
nearly 6,000 temperature records  were shattered over the holidays.  Tornadoes ravaged parts of Texas,  Arkansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee, rivers flooded their banks  throughout the Midwest.  Meanwhile, portions of England, Ireland,  Scotland, Wales, Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay lay submerged under  floodwaters.
The most frightening news, though, came out of the Arctic, where  temperatures on New Year’s Day were projected to be more than 60 F.  degrees above normal.  That made the North Pole, 
as one reporter observed, “hotter than Chicago, Vienna or Istanbul.”
Such radical gyrations in the climate are already causing unseen  suffering and hardship for countless of the earth’s inhabitants.   Millions of people have been displaced from their homes or lost their  livelihoods as a result of one degree of warming.  Farmers in Bangladesh  have watched helplessly as ocean water inundates their rice fields.   Whole Inuit communities had to be relocated after melting permafrost  caused their homes to sink into the ground.  In Iraq this summer, the  temperature soared to 
120 degrees Fahrenheit  — 159 degrees with humidity factored in — and remained there for days.   Scientists believe that large portions of the Middle East, currently  home to 200 million people, will be inhospitable to human life by the  end of the century.
But it is the other beings we share the earth with who are losing the  most.  Everywhere, animals are struggling in vain to adapt to the  rapidly changing climate.  In Europe and Asia, bears have stopped  hibernating.  In Alaska, walruses are crowding on shore, and trampling  each other, because the sea ice they depend upon to survive has  vanished.  Whales and dolphins are dying in droves.  Sea lions in  California are starving.  Penguins, lost and disoriented, have washed up  on the beaches of Rio de Janeiro.  Tens of millions of bats have  perished from white nose fungus.  Hundreds of monkeys in Costa Rica  starved to death, or succumbed to illness, when ceaseless winter rains  kept them from coming down from their trees to forage.  
And on and on, across the phylogenetic spectrum. 
Homo sapiens  is causing the greatest mass species extinction event in over 60 million  years.  And global warming is radically accelerating the process. 
All of this, and much more, from atmospheric warming of less than 1.5  degrees Fahrenheit.  Now, imagine ratcheting that up by an additional  five, or six, degrees.  Or, in all likelihood, more than that.  Because  there is no reason to believe that the countries that signed the Paris  agreement will fulfill even their existing inadequate promises.
What will so hot a world look like?  Which of the many thousands of  species clinging today to the knife’s edge of survival will survive?  
In the absence of decisive international action, clearly, we are going  to turn the planet into a living Hell.  Meanwhile, the closer one looks  at the details of the Paris accord, the more the latter resembles a  stage illusion — a hollow shell carefully constructed to resemble  something solid.  
Much has been made of the pledge of the wealthy nations to help poorer  ones offset the cost of shifting to renewable energy sources.  But the  same promises have been made by the wealthy countries before, and they  have not been kept.  Though vague about how they are going to help the  peoples of the global South, wealthy nations were nonetheless careful to  include language in the treaty allowing them to offset future C02  emissions through so-called “carbon sinks” — planting trees to recapture  CO2.  However, since it takes decades for forests to mature, such  “sinks” are viewed by most experts as the equivalent of the magician’s  legerdemain, a clever manipulation to create the appearance of something  out of nothing.
The agreement also says nothing about animal agriculture — the second  leading cause of global warming, responsible for more emissions than all  cars and trucks combined.  The absence of any recommendation to reduce  or eliminate animal agriculture is a clear concession to the factory  farming and cattle ranching lobbies, 
which doubtlessly worked hard to keep animal agriculture off the table in climate negotiations.
And so on.  Such omissions led James Hansen, the former NASA scientist and a leading authority on climate change, rightly to 
denounce the Paris agreement  as a “fraud” and a “fake.”  As Hansen and others suggest, the illusion  of action in Paris may in fact prove worse than no action at all.  For  it has left the public with the mistaken impression that the climate  crisis is now going to be dealt with, perhaps even solved, on the cheap,  in half-measures, and without disturbing the powerful economic and  social forces that profit from ecological destruction.  And that is the  greatest deception of all
See Ivan? even this HuffPost libtard "believer" knows these agreements are flawed. too bad he actually "believes"