The hell with this

Her final post was on September 10. According to you on September 22, it had been extended to a year. That is 12 days, right at a week and a half. Not exactly "weeks".

If she is, in fact, banned for a year (pretty sure that isn't your info to share)-- then there are a very very LIMITED number of reasons that one with no prior major bans can be banned for that length of time. And if it were me, I probably wouldn't want that put out there publicly.

It really is a shame that you seem so hell bent on trashing Kitty's reputation. Originally Posted by GracePreston

I never said she was banned for a year starting on September 22nd. You should do the math on the countdown date. If you have your nose in Kitty's business as much as you lead on. you would know she was banned for a year, and what date the ban came in effect. The fact that you are now attempting to cast doubt that she was banned for a year is just a continuation of your little ways to put her down without making it obvious what your true intentions are.

Jasmine knows what you are up to just like I do, and I guarantee others can see it to. Always bringing up "facts" or "clues" from the past, and adding some "point of view" to say its ok for the trolls to say certain things.

And you are right, it really is a shame that YOU seem so hell bent on trashing Kitty's reputation.

It is obvious that you are jealous of her, I dont see anyone taking you to Vegas.

I have never bashed Kitty once but yet you accuse me of that, but it is just to draw attention away from what you are really doing. You are the one always bringing up old links, or old stuff she "allegedly" said 7 years ago.

You really have fallen from Grace, and have become a complete disGrace.

Actually-- you mentioned on September 22 in this thread that her ban had been extended for a year. My point to you is-- that ISN'T your information to share. The fact that you insist upon sharing information that ISN'T yours to share, it suggests you are attempting to cast a bad light on her, particularly when you consider the reasons a person earns a 1 year ban.

I don't brag about my conquests, and I certainly don't put my clients business out on the open board. I've traveled both domestically and internationally- but one of the first tenets of the hobby is discretion. I don't discuss where I go or who I go with unless the gentleman decides to release that information themselves. It would seem that discretion would be even more important for a woman who chooses to show her face in escort ads.

The fact that you keep on bringing up Kitty-- knowing that so many are going to hop on the wagon, suggests that your intention is to further bring her down. I frankly do not care what you, or TSJasmine, or frankly anyone else on this board thinks of me. That's the benefit of not relying on a whore board for validation.

Sorry Grace but I dont know what "reasons" a person gets a year ban. All I know is that Kitty was given one for pretty much defending herself against trolls like you.

Just because I posted on September 22nd does not mean that is the date the ban started. I dont watch Kitty 24/7 like you clearly do, seeing as you are the one who always brings up old links and old stuff she "allegedly" said many years ago.

The fact that you keep trying to find some way to discredit me, or discredit anyone else like Jasmine who tries to defend Kitty clearly shows that you want everyone to not defend her, and push her memory off this site. I dont know what your real agenda is, I dont know if Kitty took you under her wing and then you got jealous of her or what.

What I do know is that Kitty's memory will never be erased from this site. It will always live on, and we are not going to let people like you stop that.

Its not "alleged" if it is actually something she has said. That's why I post links to HER posts, rather than quoting-- as I know some people have edited quotes in the past. If you had not insisted upon calling another poster a liar, I wouldn't have had to show the evidence to the contrary--

One year bans are handed to those who out members of the board. I believe a person with multiple bans in the past can also get an extended vacation-- but that wouldn't apply to Kitty. She kept her paws somewhat clean in regards to points and bannable offenses up until this.

I'm not trying to discredit TSJasmine. I don't know the girl but I do know she's friends with Kitty-- so at the core, I believe her intentions are good. You, on the other hand, have pretty much already been discredited since you first hopped on the board. We all know you're a mandle-- and I'm fairly certain that your only mission is to further the agenda against Kitty on the board. The only people on this board that you have "stood up for" are people with a long history of drama and problems. If anything, Kitty is the mildest of those that you defend. Its rather sad that, thanks to you, she is getting lumped in with the likes of vi and company.

I never said she was banned for a year starting on September 22nd. You should do the math on the countdown date. If you have your nose in Kitty's business as much as you lead on. you would know she was banned for a year, and what date the ban came in effect. The fact that you are now attempting to cast doubt that she was banned for a year is just a continuation of your little ways to put her down without making it obvious what your true intentions are.

Jasmine knows what you are up to just like I do, and I guarantee others can see it to. Always bringing up "facts" or "clues" from the past, and adding some "point of view" to say its ok for the trolls to say certain things.

And you are right, it really is a shame that YOU seem so hell bent on trashing Kitty's reputation.

It is obvious that you are jealous of her, I dont see anyone taking you to Vegas.

I have never bashed Kitty once but yet you accuse me of that, but it is just to draw attention away from what you are really doing. You are the one always bringing up old links, or old stuff she "allegedly" said 7 years ago.

You really have fallen from Grace, and have become a complete disGrace. Originally Posted by SteveOTX

Pretty sure Kitty gets the credit for bashing her own reputation, not anyone else.

Its not "alleged" if it is actually something she has said. That's why I post links to HER posts, rather than quoting-- as I know some people have edited quotes in the past. If you had not insisted upon calling another poster a liar, I wouldn't have had to show the evidence to the contrary--

One year bans are handed to those who out members of the board. I believe a person with multiple bans in the past can also get an extended vacation-- but that wouldn't apply to Kitty. She kept her paws somewhat clean in regards to points and bannable offenses up until this.

I'm not trying to discredit TSJasmine. I don't know the girl but I do know she's friends with Kitty-- so at the core, I believe her intentions are good. You, on the other hand, have pretty much already been discredited since you first hopped on the board. We all know you're a mandle-- and I'm fairly certain that your only mission is to further the agenda against Kitty on the board. The only people on this board that you have "stood up for" are people with a long history of drama and problems. If anything, Kitty is the mildest of those that you defend. Its rather sad that, thanks to you, she is getting lumped in with the likes of vi and company. Originally Posted by GracePreston

Its so funny how you think you know everything and make a complete fool out of yourself with these ridiculous claims.

I love how you keep accusing me of bashing Kitty when all I do is defend her against people like you. Also you just admitted that you post links to previous threads of hers from the past. Maybe she did make mistakes in the past, and now you keep posting links to these 5 or 7 year old mistakes for your own personal agenda.

Like I said before, it is completely obvious that you are jealous of Kitty, which is why you continue to dig up old info on her. I can see why you are jealous, as she is more successful and famous than you ever will be.

Like Jasmine said, Kitty drives a 2016, that's right 2016 Infiniti Q50 S. And you are sitting there with your 1991 Honda Civic that has 285k miles, huge oxidation spots all over the hood and roof, no A/C or Heat, power windows that dont work anymore, and you have to get in through the passenger side cuz your driver's side door doesn't open.

I never denied posting the link from THREE years ago. You said that she never claimed to be homeless on this board. I proved you were incorrect. The end.

I frankly don't care what type of car she drives. A woman of her age with 20 years in the adult industry should have a nice car (preferrably paid off), a home that is either fully paid off or almost there, and a nice retirement nest egg. Many ladies I know in the same age bracket own multiple properties. That's just common sense for a woman in this industry. It isn't "forever" money. For her sake, I do hope she is working towards owning a home and saving for retirement. We all have a shelf life.

A woman of her age with 20 years in the adult industry Originally Posted by GracePreston

There you go again. You are nothing but a hypocrite, I'm done with you.

Those are her own words. She has spoke often about her 20 years in the adult industry. That is not a dig. In fact, if you check the history-- I'm known for sticking up for her when gents claim her to be older than she is. She is in her 40's. I'm not far behind.

There you go again. You are nothing but a hypocrite, I'm done with you. Originally Posted by SteveOTX

lucky for grace. now can you be done with eccie? eccie can be hypocritical too.... cmon, cmon...

... Kitty drives a 2016, that's right 2016 Infiniti Q50 S. Originally Posted by SteveOTX

What color is it?

... I'm done with you. Originally Posted by SteveOTX

I'll take the 'Under'.

Its so funny how you think you know everything and make a complete fool out of yourself with these ridiculous claims. Originally Posted by SteveOTX

HAHAHAHA!!! "Ridiculous claims?!?" She backs her claims up with actual FACTS and POSTS made by Kitty herself!!! Steve/vi is getting her ass kicked left and right and is too clueless to realize it! You have NOTHING to come back with except insults. HAHAHAHA!!!

You never show anywhere on any of your posts any actual proof of anything to back up the horseshit that you spew. Grace shows you proof. So your only recourse is to attack her with unverifiable bullshit.

You lose.....again.

You're just as bull-headed and ignorant as Kitty is. I tried to tell her to just ignore these threads and eventually it'll all go away. There are PLENTY of hookers that use this site, but NEVER post in the Coed section. But NOOOOOO....She loved the drama too much to stop. Same shit with you "Steve." You have no idea how much of an ass you are making yourself look like with every post . How do you not realize that we are all laughing at you and your buddies?

Just walk away. But, like Kitty before you, I doubt that you will. You love this shit.

He/She thinks that if he keeps up with the insults, he/she can pull me offsides. I'm guessing ol' Steve doesn't grasp that when I say I don't care what people on a SHMB think of me, I mean it. Its entertainment, nothing more.

Its what I have said to Kitty in the past. If people are saying shit that you KNOW is false, then just roll right past it and don't worry about it. I told her to stay out of the discussion unless she can calmly state her case, present facts, and move on without emotion. Some people can do that and others can't and there is NOTHING wrong with being an emotional person-- but it does mean that you need to recognize when to walk away.

Those are her own words. She has spoke often about her 20 years in the adult industry. That is not a dig. In fact, if you check the history-- I'm known for sticking up for her when gents claim her to be older than she is. She is in her 40's. I'm not far behind. Originally Posted by GracePreston

if shes in her 40's, i'll kiss your ass.....she's mid fiddys at least

Well-- pucker up. She is in her 40's. You know I'm not going to say it if I don't know 100% that it is factual. That one is a fact.