Why no answer Mr. St. Christopher?

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

you did .. along with all those salamanders at Barton creek .. u murderer !!!

oh the humanity!! salamander killer!!!!





bahahaaaa
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Fucking moron.

(One of many)
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
its bobba time!!!!
lustylad's Avatar
You recognized a total lack of support by our mods on a valid question they never had the courtesy or the balls to rule on. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Hey munchkin, don't give up! Don't be a quitter!

I'm sure if you keep telling the mods how rude and chickenshit they are, eventually you'll get a response out of them!
First off, I love it when posters respond with comment about drinking induced comments.
It is the ultimate female wolf response of rolling over on her back and offering up of her throat (or ass) for the alpha male to do as he chooses.
Instead of keeping her fucking mouth shut and acknowledging she has been stunned and has no refute of any other kind. These usually come from posters with high numbers of posts because, God love the little stupid bastards, they can't let it go without another stupid remark.

But the rules of the forum clearly prohibit such remarks about drinking alcohol


You all know the big forbidden topics such as children, underage sex, illicit drug mention and drug use mentions, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance and any type of racial slurs...those will not be tolerated.

It doesn't say illicit drug mention and illicit drug use. It says drug use. Alcohol is a drug.
It has a negative impact on millions of people's lives

So if you won't enforce your own rules, change them.

Anything is better than being a spineless hypocrite.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
You are absolutely right in another thread I was called a drunken fool by some guy named budman and immediately hit the RTM button but have yet to see the MODs react calling someone a drunken fool is no different than saying someone is high off forbidden subject. Why the double standards MODs? I think this whole political forum needs to go to the sewer - it's nothing but grown men throwing insults at each other - and why do you want a political forum on a whore board.
lustylad's Avatar
You are absolutely right in another thread I was called a drunken fool by some guy named budman and immediately hit the RTM button but have yet to see the MODs react... Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt
Attaboy, Puke! Keep up the good work and you'll soon get promoted to Deputy Hall Monitor!

Did you also RTM that guy who went through the express "12 items or less" checkout lane at the supermarket with 13 items?

And keep bumping this thread! Your weighing in with your 420 lbs. on this weighty matter means a helluva lot to dickmuncher!
Attaboy, Puke! Keep up the good work and you'll soon get promoted to Deputy Hall Monitor!

Did you also RTM that guy who went through the express "12 items or less" checkout lane at the supermarket with 13 items?
Originally Posted by lustylad
Look whose talking you minimum wage earning, wal mart shopping, thrift clothes wearing, cheap ass 50 dollar body rub hobbyist - go fuck off and get a better paying job and then you can afford R.M's ridiculous rate.
lustylad's Avatar
I think this whole political forum needs to go to the sewer - it's nothing but grown men throwing insults at each other... Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

You might have a point there, Puke Whinyass... but thankfully, we have you here to calm everyone down...


LET ME TELL YOU ONE THING BAMBINO AND IF I AM SO FORTUNATE TO CROSS PATHS WITH YOU AND FIND OUT WHO YOU ARE OR WHERE YOU LIVE- I WILL BEAT YOU TO AN INCH OF YOUR LIFE. YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND RTM THIS TO THE MODS OR EVEN YOUR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY.
YOU ARE A WORTHLESS COWARD AND I WILL TRY MY BEST TO END YOUR LIFE- THAT'S A PROMISE AND NOT A THREAT!!! GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!
DO YOU NEED A REMINDER OF WHAT I DID BEFORE I JOINED THE MILITARY??????
Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt
Munchmasterman's Avatar
How quickly you go for your big gun. Ignorance. You figure what's good enough for trumpys is better than you deserve.
You posted part of the post that explained things. But you didn't understand the points. Either of them.
One explained why those who guess at the reason are doing tanto's pretending to read minds.
The other point was they have say and you don't.
Funny how a quitter thinks everyone else is.

Like I said Ignorance. You have no idea how little you know.

Thanks for the bump, bitch.
Hey munchkin, don't give up! Don't be a quitter!

I'm sure if you keep telling the mods how rude and chickenshit they are, eventually you'll get a response out of them!
Originally Posted by lustylad
lustylad's Avatar
You have no idea how little you know. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Wrong again, assmuncher. The aim of all education is to teach how little you know. Which explains why you're such a pompous know-it-all.

Don't forget to insult the mods one more time before turning off the lights, munchboy.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
There you go showing your stupidity again, masterdickmuncher. The adjective "illicit" serves to define the nouns "drug" and "drug use" on both sides of the coordinating conjunction "and", masterdickmuncher. Only a stupid-ass like yourself would read it any differently, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Sorry. "Illicit drug" and "drug use" are 2 types of the noun "mention". "Illicit drug mention" and "drug use mentions" are both noun phrases. "And"
is the coordinating conjunction that links the 2 noun phrases.
The adjective "illicit" only describes the type of drug the mention is referring to in the first noun phrase. It is an illicit drug mention. In the second noun phrase, "drug" only describes the type of use the mention is referring to in the second noun phrase. It is a drug use mention.
The noun phrases are separate until joined by "and". "Illicit" plays no part in the second noun phrase.

http://www.studypro.eu/v2/english-gr...positions.html

http://www.grammar-monster.com/gloss...un_phrases.htm

mention
[men-shuhn]

verb (used with object)
1.
to refer briefly to; name, specify, or speak of:
Don't forget to mention her contribution to the project.
2.
to cite formally for a meritorious act or achievement:
He was mentioned in dispatches from the war zone.

noun
3.
a direct or incidental reference; a mentioning:
to make mention of a place.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Wrong again, assmuncher. The aim of all education is to teach how little you know. Which explains why you're such a pompous know-it-all.

Don't forget to insult the mods one more time before turning off the lights, munchboy.
Originally Posted by lustylad
Not even close, blo-atar.

The aim of education is to reduce the volume of what you don't know and to increase a person's knowledge in areas they need to know about.

I can see you spending your life learning how little you know.

I can see it because you show off what you've learned all the time.

As far as being a know it all, it might appear that way to a know-nothing such as yourself. I know how to look things up.
I don't parrot someone like tranny fucker. I check to see if someone is right before I agree or endorse what they say.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Sorry. "Illicit drug" and "drug use" are 2 types of the noun "mention". "Illicit drug mention" and "drug use mentions" are both noun phrases. "And"
is the coordinating conjunction that links the 2 noun phrases.
The adjective "illicit" only describes the type of drug the mention is referring to in the first noun phrase. It is an illicit drug mention. In the second noun phrase, "drug" only describes the type of use the mention is referring to in the second noun phrase. It is a drug use mention.
The noun phrases are separate until joined by "and". "Illicit" plays no part in the second noun phrase.

http://www.studypro.eu/v2/english-gr...positions.html

http://www.grammar-monster.com/gloss...un_phrases.htm

mention
[men-shuhn]

verb (used with object)
1.
to refer briefly to; name, specify, or speak of:
Don't forget to mention her contribution to the project.
2.
to cite formally for a meritorious act or achievement:
He was mentioned in dispatches from the war zone.

noun
3.
a direct or incidental reference; a mentioning:
to make mention of a place.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Only in your feeble little mind, masterdickmuncher. Everyone else reads it and understands that "illicit" applies to the nouns on both sides of the conjunction, masterdickmuncher.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Only in your feeble little mind, masterdickmuncher. Everyone else reads it and understands that "illicit" applies to the nouns on both sides of the conjunction, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You speak for everyone? In other words, you can't refute me.

This is just like your stance on the assault of the reporter in Montana. In that case, your claim was refuted by the congressman himself.

In this case, your large, trembling, and well chewed lower lip in its pout position won't change the fact that you, and any of the people you actually speak for, have a misunderstanding. I included links to help ease the burden of understanding for you.

But you'll come back without links or proof and claim your unsupportable position is correct.