For the sake of argument, let's say a ban on a certain weapons did come into effect.
What then?
The next week some kid goes in with a pump 12GA, and 3 rounds at a time starts killing.
Are we banning the VP Biden approved shotgun after that?
What happens then?
Ban everything right?
Originally Posted by grean
Or like the VA tech shooter, just walks in with a quartet of loaded 9 mm pistols, and opens up, dropping each as they run out..
AND YES imo that would be the left's response "WELL we need to ban every weapon now"..
Eliminate both and you go back to a model where the family's and churches have to support the children thus born... pretty quick you end the problem of out of wedlock births. The only reason it's so acceptable is that Uncle Sugar can pay for the crumb-stealers. Eliminate that avenue and see how quickly society turns up the pressure to prevent out of wedlock births.
Originally Posted by texassapper
Very true. BITD when we didn't HAVE welfare to take care of baby mammas, though we still had kids born out of wedlock, it was a HELL OF A LOT LESS.. Once welfare started, the #s imo balloonned up.
Just about half of SS is consumed by white folk.
Just sayin'. Black folk ain't the problem with welfare.
Originally Posted by grean
Are you referring to Social Security? If so, how does one obtain Social Security?
Jim
Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Green. Social security is NOT WELFARE. NOR Is it an entitlement program, as you PAY INTO SS, by working!!!