[QUOTE=HedonistForever;10621346 23]
But you are advocating just that. Free to come and go but mostly come and stay. You say we have plenty of room for more which defies what most people who understand what over population can do. You say we have room for more and talked about how more refugees could be adsorbed but I think even you would agree, that number has a limit which is all I'm saying. You want to go back to the number that Obama allowed. I'd be willing to debate and compromise but unfortunately whether you want to accept as fact and you don't, that many people in the Democrat party and I believe that number is growing with the influence of the AOC's in the party, have no number in mind. They refuse to put a number to how many can come and stay. You refuse to believe that there are those who do want to remove any and all border controls.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
This is hardly the first time you've made assumptions about how I feel about issues. I have never mentioned sanctuary cities. It is a totally different subject than open borders.
I have said Trump has drastically cut the number of legal refugees to be allowed into the country. That is fact. I do agree that there has to be a limit on that number. I think Trump's number is far too low.
I have not seen any refugee number proposed by Biden, AOC, or anyone else in the Democratic hierarchy. If you have any RELIABLE source that says the number of refugees being proposed by Democrats to be obscenely high, please cite it.
And yes, I don't think there is anyone with power in the Democratic party who want to remove any and all border controls. Again, if you can prove me wrong by citing a RELIABLE source stating otherwise, please do so.