Do you even review what you send? Let me give you the conclusion of the white paper you linked to:Whoa, heavy stuff.
“ Conclusions
The notion of cascading systemic bias, induced by government funding, does not appear to have been much studied. This is a big gap in the research on science and public policy. Moreover, if this sort of bias is indeed widespread then there is a serious need for new policies to prevent it, both at the Federal level and within the scientific community itself.”
The conclusion of this white paper provides no evidence that bias may exist, only speculation. In fact, this document was written for a libertarian think tank; the author would have been motivated to provide a conclusion that his benefactors favored. He couldn’t find any evidence, so he just didn’t say no. It’s more likely this document suffers from the very same bias that it speculates can be found in federally funded research.
This is the second time you’ve provided content that did not support your argument. You are showing a pattern of not being able to understand the information that you offer as proof. You claim you are able to retrieve information from disparate sources and come to a fact-based conclusion, but have not shown the ability to even comprehend a single source correctly,
You’ve proved on this thread that you are the ignorant and the self-righteous. Providing material as justification for your beliefs, when you either do not or cannot read it, as it does nothing to support those beliefs.
The only thing you’ll get from me going forward is pity. Originally Posted by Gdubya110
I'm honored to have earned your pity. I promise not to let you down.😂
I have new submission pending your imminent rejection:
http://www.jamesgmartin.center/2020/...emic-research/