Best beer commercial ever

Pathetic when the only thing on your resume is your sexual preferences
Can we go back to don't ask and don't tell because no one cares

Nothing was forced on anyone by this, so your common sense aphorisms are meaningless drivel as usual, Bam Originally Posted by HDGristle

Of course it was. AB was forced to shoot itself. Their customer base chose not to follow along. Wake up Mr Gristle. BTW Mr Gristle, it appears you’re getting agitated. One could interpret your last post as insulting. Which means you’re losing the debate. And you know it. Mebbe you should take a self imposed timeout again.

Blackrock has a big position at InBev. I’m guessing Vangaurd does too. But they’re a private company.


https://fintel.io/so/us/bud/blackrock

As Klaus Schwab said “you’ll own nothing and be happy”. People can’t see the forest thru the trees

Who's saying they would be? That's a complete strawman and not even remotely a point I'm making. Originally Posted by HDGristle

nothing strawman about it. unless all of Bud's board members are scarecrows. as your link speculates, Bud will be fine long term, unless they double down on woke advertising.



Bud senior management and their board are likely smart enough to recognize they made a huge mistake and if they are smart, will throw their cuntass marketing exec under a bus who recently claimed Bud needed more "diversity" and cooked up this nonsense.

nothing strawman about it. unless all of Bud's board members are scarecrows. as your link speculates, Bud will be fine long term, unless they double down on woke advertising.



Bud senior management and their board are likely smart enough to recognize they made a huge mistake and if they are smart, will throw their cuntass marketing exec under a bus who recently claimed Bud needed more "diversity" and cooked up this nonsense. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

If you want to reach a niche market, you don’t do it at the expense of your #1 brand. I’m guessing Trannys don’t drink Bud Light. Mebbe a cool Mimosa type beverage?


BAHAHAHAHA

No, Bam. It will be pretty clear when I intend to insult you and if I'm agitated. Until then, I'll continue having fun.

And those are choices, not being forced. And consumers weren't forced into anything. World's full of choices. And opinions. And assholes.

Waco, it's most definitely a strawman. But feel free to double down

Bawitdaba

No, Bam. It will be pretty clear when I intend to insult you and if I'm agitated. Until then, I'll continue having fun.

And those are choices, not being forced. And consumers weren't forced into anything. World's full of choices. An opinions. And assholes.

Waco, it's most definitely a strawman. But feel free to double down Originally Posted by HDGristle

AB was was forced. The consumer made a choice. DUH. And please, insult me so bad it hurts!!!! I still won’t block you.,

Educate yourself


Everything you need to know about BlackRock, the company that owns the world

The investment giant is pushing woke politics in the form of corporate social credit scores (ESG), which includes the dangerous “net zero” and LGBT agenda. BlackRock is also responsible for rigging the financial systems and has control over a significant portion of the world’s wealth.

In order to fight back, we need to know what we are dealing with. In this article, we take a deep dive into the history, current business practices, and plans of the globalist behemoth known as BlackRock.

Read

https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/119034

No, Bam. It will be pretty clear when I intend to insult you and if I'm agitated. Until then, I'll continue having fun.

And those are choices, not being forced. And consumers weren't forced into anything. World's full of choices. And opinions. And assholes.

Waco, it's most definitely a strawman. But feel free to double down

Bawitdaba Originally Posted by HDGristle

i won't be doubling down. let's see if Bud does. you misunderstand the strawman argument.

i won't be doubling down. let's see if Bud does. you misunderstand the strawman argument. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Claiming a “straw man argument” is his crutch. Not much else. He literally makes shit up. And attributes it to your thought process. Libtard 101.

i won't be doubling down. let's see if Bud does. you misunderstand the strawman argument. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

No, I understand YOUR strawman just fine. Whether any BoD would be happy about a loss in market cap has nothing to do with the point I was making or what was addressed in the article. It was a literal setup of something that wasn't in dispute as a rebuttal.

Moving beyond that, you saw BUD was up 1.51% today, right? Which means the loss has been trimmed to 3.03% over the past 5d. And they're still near their 52wk high despite the controversy.

Watching the daily isn't the way if we're going to look at the impact. There were key details in the views I mentioned that you glossed over. So here's the most recent Seeking Alpha.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/459...eting-campaign

They appear to be weathering the storm until we see the actual sales data, but the BoD was already unhappy with stagnant growth. Why did I highlight the 6mo, 1yr and 5yr?

Did YOU understand MY point?

Claiming a “straw man argument” is his crutch. Not much else. He literally makes shit up. And attributes it to your thought process. Libtard 101. Originally Posted by bambino

yes

No, I understand YOUR strawman just fine. Whether any BoD would be happy about a loss in market cap has nothing to do with the point I was making or what was addressed in the article. It was a literal setup of something that wasn't in dispute as a rebuttal.

Moving beyond that, you saw BUD was up 1.51% today, right? Which means the loss has been trimmed to 3.03% over the past 5d. And they're still near their 52wk high despite the controversy.

Watching the daily isn't the way if we're going to look at the impact. There were key details in the views I mentioned that you glossed over. So here's the most recent Seeking Alpha.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/459...eting-campaign

They appear to be weathering the storm until we see the actual sales data, but the BoD was already unhappy with stagnant growth. Why did I highlight the 6mo, 1yr and 5yr?

Did YOU understand MY point? Originally Posted by HDGristle

no

Clearly not. Because while their Q4 slightly edged above their targets, they were already underperforming in NA if you stop laser focusing the short term and start with questions about their ability to grow.

https://www.reuters.com/article/ab-i...-idAFL8N3596EH

https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatsp...om-for-growth/

Haven't you guys realized after all this time that I seed you opportunities to drill deeper? I literally give data and links full of data and positions to see who takes advantage of it, who is serious and who is shitposting. Most are shitposting and pushing half-assed psuedo-aphorisms, partisan bile and wet dreams.

BUD is still within their annual growth targets atm. So while bloodbath is a cute sensationalist story... it's literally part of the fickle news cycle that may not have legs.

Here's a hint. Look at the 5yr.

Clearly not. Because while their Q4 slightly edged above their targets, they were already underperforming in NA if you stop laser focusing the short term and start with questions about their ability to grow.

https://www.reuters.com/article/ab-i...-idAFL8N3596EH

https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatsp...om-for-growth/

Haven't you guys realized after all this time that I seed you opportunities to drill deeper? I literally give data and links full of data and positions to see who takes advantage of it, who is serious and who is shitposting. Most are shitposting and pushing half-assed psuedo-aphorisms, partisan bile and wet dreams.

BUD is still within their annual growth targets atm. So while bloodbath is a cute sensationalist story... it's literally part of the fickle news cycle that may not have legs.

Here's a hint. Look at the 5yr. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Past does not prove future. Especially in this case Mr Gristle

Past does not prove future. Especially in this case Mr Gristle Originally Posted by bambino

That would be the half-assed psuedo-aphorism

That would be the half-assed psuedo-aphorism Originally Posted by HDGristle

If you say so.

In therein lies the rub. AB built their brand over 100yrs. Built on “traditional’ values. They didn’t force their products on people. People chose to buy it. But then they were acquired by InBev. A global company. No doubt controlled by Black Rock/Vangaurd. And Wa-La, they are “forcing” a tranny agenda. The backlash was predictable. People can chose to buy products that align with their own beliefs and morals. And they’re fleeing from Bud Light. My guess, they won’t come back. Originally Posted by bambino

... THIS is a rather rational opinion.

The "upper management" has stated that they
"weren't aware" of this "woke" decision... And that
the decision was made by - how did they put it -
"lower-level marketing member" (??) - something
to that effect. ...

... So it surely stands to reason that THEY
are not pleased with has happened.

... This surely aint complicated, mates.
No need to make it so.

#### Salty