Just finished.... Originally Posted by Lantern2814Jeezis. FINALLY you show up. We have true closure now.
Get over yourself. Or not. Doesn't matter.
.
Totally, 100% agree that the J6 trespassing incident was a blip on the radar in comparison to the organized rioting and violent crime funded and perpetrated by the transvestite party whenever their rumps have been rightfully kicked out of power.all the "trespassers" did get hunted down and
My actual question is why do the male lesbian and angry dyke democrats get so worked up over a government building being trespassed, but they're fine with ordinary citizens being attacked/killed, their property being destroyed, and the general nuisance these animals represent.
Originally Posted by Next Best Thing
Sure roo but please let the people know why you care more about one specific government building filled with spoiled lying scumbags than you appear to about private property owned by ordinary citizens? Originally Posted by Next Best ThingMisrepresenting what I have said is beneath you. You can do better.
Sure roo but please let the people know why you care more about one specific government building filled with spoiled lying scumbags than you appear to about private property owned by ordinary citizens? Originally Posted by Next Best Thing
Misrepresenting what I have said is beneath you. You can do better.
Thank you Originally Posted by rooster
Deflect:
“To avoid something such as criticism, blame, or a question being directed at you.” Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR
socialismWhatta surprise that the 2 of you would MISREPRESENT the entire situation...and that your misrepresentation would be based on flawed logic and absurd assumption.
no answer = socialism
BAHAHAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Whatta surprise that the 2 of you would MISREPRESENT the entire situation...and that your misrepresentation would be based on flawed logic and absurd assumption.
My criticism of NBT's "question" is valid.
I have implied that he should clarify.
And he certainly can speak for himself.
Let him do so. You sure AF ain't helping. And he doesn't need it...
But...be assured...I am still fully capable...and willing... to answer his original question, if he choses not to expound.
It's better for you if I don't.
But mostly... I'm just showing some respect, allowing him the courtesy to restate it and improve upon his point. It's not a challenge, and I am not looking to take advantage of it...I'm just thinking it will make for better dialog.
And it certainly is not an accommodation that I would ever allow for you.
I'll give it til this time tomorrow.
You are welcome.
. Originally Posted by rooster