It's a damn shame that providers are held to same standards that doctors are. The paper prints a typo, that's a permanent mistake but forgivable. There is a hair in your dinner, the cook makes you another. The movie you rented is scratched, switch it out. I bought a Kenmore washer thinking it would last a lifetime. It lasted two months past the one year warranty. A fluke? Sure, life happens. But do you write a review before talking to the place of business that failed you about their performance? Why can't providers who have proven themselves as quality get the same courtesy? Are y'all afraid that she will bite you if you give her constructive criticism in place of a permanent bad review? If you really feel that this is her best, then by all means, the guys need to know. I need to know! But for ladies who have an off day and/or an emotional outburst in response, lay off dudes. Chill, get a beer and chillllllllllllllllllllllll.
Originally Posted by HunterGrace
So are providers like you willing to give another session if a client is not satisfied like the chef who makes you another dinner or the movie rental place that switches out the scratched disk? Papers that make typo or mistakes publish corrections later. I see no apology or correction here.
As for constructive criticism, how does that remedy tbone's situation? Even though he spent a good amount of money and was left unhappy,
he's the one that should give her the benefit of doubt and do something that benefits her? As has been mentioned many times in this thread, those ladies that have an off day or aren't perfect can weather a bad review or two without problems. I don't think this "sadistic" display for our entertainment would be happening if she, as the chef, didn't come back to our table and threw the shitty plate in our faces. If she, as the movie rental place, didn't tell us to fuck off because the disk is scratched, then charged us the purchase price of the movie.
Besides, how do you know there was no constructive criticism given? There was obviously some communication back and forth after the session.
We should lay off and chill? Give constructive criticism? At what point is a bad review warranted? Should we, after a bad session, give constructive criticism, then go back? If we don't go back after the first bad session, then we should just give criticism and shut the fuck up? Seems to me that you're advocating that we just give feedback, lay off and chill, and never write a bad review unless we waste more money and time to see a bad provider at least twice. That really should work in your favor, shouldn't it?
I have known of Karlie for as long as I have been hobbying. I've never heard any thing but positive things about her. I can understand that a bad review is simply a message that your game is slipping. How is a girl to know that her game is slipping unless someone says, " you have a new review and it looks like your game is slipping."
That said, let's remember that Karlie isn't as mature [old] as most of you hobbiests and so her one emotional outburst in three years was probably just a sign that she is indeed a hottie in her twenties and not as perfect as the rest of y'all yet. Until this one little bitty outburst that will be forgotten in a week, she was pretty damn close.
I can understand the young having an outburst. Hell I can even understand the old having an outburst. However, there are outbursts, then there are outbursts.
LauraLucks telling us she doesn't want to suck our cocks for money anymore was an outburst. The fact that this is titled "You asked for it" tells me that this is a deliberate outburst calculated to do damage to tbone, and she made the decision to post his personal business in public. This is a bit more than just an outburst, but a breach of confidence.
I have had unhappy clients, two that were really unhappy. They could have reviewed and their displeasure would have been an honest recount. I, like Karlie, am flawed. And let this one bad review of Karlie prove that she isn't a one size fits all provider that the displeased client had expected. Certainly he could have talked to her directly so that she could have corrected her game and been given a chance to make right if she choose. Instead, y'all are ready to burn her at the stake! (Sadly, a few ladies will judge her for this one outburst and then have the nerve to get angry when judged themselves on this or that. It could be another "twenties age" thing of not mastering control of oneself yet, a malicious thing, a threAD op, or a genuine attempt to create a sense of accountability to the other providers, no matter the motive, the effect is harsh, intolerant lynching without a second thought to the effects words could have on this sweet young lady.)
I hope you decide to give her some grace rather than keep using her to feed your hungry appetite for entertainment. At the very least, send her a consolation gift so she's not being totally being used for your selfish sadistic amusement.
This is why girls like me have been staying away from the board. And now, I shall depart as fast as I appeared. POOF!
"Girls like you" like to tell us to not write bad reviews because of the effects those words have on "sweet young ladies". That, in essence, is telling us to ignore the purpose of the board - information exchange. If we followed your advice, there would be no bad reviews, no reports of NCNS, wasting our time, or using deceptive pictures. I know you wouldn't ever stoop to such things, but there have been ladies here who have done those things. Some unscrupulous providers have even gone so far as to try to trash other members, black mail others, manipulate men and women, bait & switch, lie about their age and looks, then they disappear and reappear under new name and persona. If you still think retaliating against a bad review by outing personal business should be given the same leeway as Netflix sending a scratched disk, please go back under the rock you crawled out from.