Sorry Nktatc I disagree, again, this is not a war against a nation, bombing the crap out of a nation is not the answer and it would certainly would have a repercussion against us from other countries, as much as we may not like their goverments, their cultures, their beliefs or their people, bombing a country for the beliefs of a few is not the answer. If we have a mission to accomplish, let's do it and get out. The problem, in my opinion, is that we have lost sense of the mission and are still there to save face, but the reality is, you can get the the top leadership of the insurgents out and a new leadership will arise. We have won many battles, lost a few (like the latest one) but I believe there is no way for us to win the war, if any of you think that is possible, then you have to accept the loses as much as may not like it, It is a war after all. I again say, bring our boys and girls home. we tried, let's not bleed anymore for a lost cause.
Originally Posted by Pica Flor
I think you misread my Post, I did not advocate any of the actions I mentioned as retaliation. I posed them as questions.
What battles have we lost? The '47 shoot down was not a battle. From the news report the helo was en route,and not involved in a vertical envelopement against hostile forces. A Hostile got a shot off with an RPG and the Helo was destroyed end of story. This is War and as tragic as it is that is the sum of it. For a frame of reference 90% of US fixed and rotary wing aircraft losses in VN were do to small arms fire to include RPG's.
I'm unclear what the Mission in Afghanistan is as it appears the Administration is as well. Bin Laden's dead. was that not the mission The Taliban still Exist however. Regarding the beliefs of "A few" I think that should be addressed in a new Thread as it addresses Political and religious issues. By the by the Allies did make war against Civilan populationss of Germany and Japan in WW 2. I make no attempt to justify those actions but they did occur.
I see no point for a US presence in Afghanistan. The Country as it is rural with very few large concentrations of peoples (ie:towns/cities). There is no infrastructure to speak in regards to services, electricity etc. and culturally it is a collection of Tribes (If anything I believe the US should be applying the strategy and tactics applied against the American Indians in the American SW in the 1870's-90's. These were quite brutal but successful for the winning side). As for Iraq it's become a pawn between The US and Iran. Iran is developing nuclear weapons which it will have and since it has a Theocratic Government based on Islam is a frightening issue to me. I could go on and on but I don't want to jump the Thread which I've already appear to be doing.