Bloomberg 2020

This what you mean by "copy-pasta" when you did this? Originally Posted by Precious_b

Nope. You may search the internets for those words. But I'll save you the time - I wrote that.

Stick to Grammar Nazi... Originally Posted by Precious_b

Ima stick to doing as I please. Thank you very much valued cat herder.

Just like a repub to quote out of context... Originally Posted by Precious_b

Oh, I know exactly the context as it was a direct quote from your post and I did not need to have you define the term you used. It's was blatantly clear what you meant and horrifically clear that it was inserted by [you] and [you] alone, based upon your own biased beliefs. If you can't man-up to it, that is your problem and only a mirror can show you the culprit.

BTW: Einstein, the little grey circle with a '>' sign that was embedded in my post, i.e. your quote, will take you directly to your full post if you click it.

... I don't recall Pelosi saying she would want bipartisan support for impeachment prior to moving forward with it but I won't say you are wrong. If she did say it, she lied, just like Trump. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I believe you can search the internets for "In May 2018 and March 2019, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposed impeachment, warning it must be bipartisan or it would be horribly divisive."to find the exact quote. I'm not saying she lied. But I will say she got bullied into it, which begs the question; would want a gutless wimp to lead anything? Certainly not a trait you would attribute to a leader like TRUMP2020, for example, by getting a prison reform accomplished across party lines.

I believe you can search the internets for "In May 2018 and March 2019, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposed impeachment, warning it must be bipartisan or it would be horribly divisive."to find the exact quote. I'm not saying she lied. But I will say she got bullied into it, which begs the question; would want a gutless wimp to lead anything? Certainly not a trait you would attribute to a leader like TRUMP2020, for example, by getting a prison reform accomplished across party lines. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Obviously we have different opinions as to what it means to "reach across party lines".

I could agree with your interpretation but then we'd both be wrong.

I reread his statement - he did forget to add banning plastic straws to the list. I have to admit that the Dems sure do have their priorities right. **snik**

IF you believe his ridiulous rhetoric you are not as smart as I give you credit for being. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I reread his statement - he did forget to add banning plastic straws to the list. I have to admit that the Dems sure do have their priorities right. **snik** Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Almost knocked over my big gulp soda when I read that, which I reckon would be a felony if Bloomingburger was in office.

I reread his statement - he did forget to add banning plastic straws to the list. I have to admit that the Dems sure do have their priorities right. **snik** Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Plastic straws are a red herring, no pun intended regarding their destructiveness to marine life.

New materials are being introduced for biodegradable straws that have all of the advantages of plastic straws with none of their disadvantages. The transition will be good PR for corporate shills, and a no-brainer for consumers.

But Republicans are so delusional that they will probably conclude that the 2020 election is all about defending plastic.

Nope. You may search the internets for those words. But I'll save you the time - I wrote that.


Ima stick to doing as I please. Thank you very much valued cat herder.



Oh, I know exactly the context as it was a direct quote from your post and I did not need to have you define the term you used. It's was blatantly clear what you meant and horrifically clear that it was inserted by [you] and [you] alone, based upon your own biased beliefs. If you can't man-up to it, that is your problem and only a mirror can show you the culprit.

BTW: Einstein, the little grey circle with a '>' sign that was embedded in my post, i.e. your quote, will take you directly to your full post if you click it. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Truthfully, I did search the Net. Nowhere to be found. OED didn't return anything so, I know it ain't English. Sacre Bleu! A Grammar Nazi chiding others on the Net about English but does not use it properly them self. I won't hold it against you.

I never told you not to do what you please. I don't think I ask anything of people here except to quote sources.

And you directly quoted what I said. But seeing as you are showing a propensity for misquoting things, you originally stated I quoted it. Tsk tsk. I don't think you are ever going to earn that Alt Wright or Alt-Wright title. But what was blatantly clear about it was the person it was used for, and I congratulated you for agreeing with me. You misdirect who to honour with your abhorring. I guess that is a failing of people who try to "suppose" what people think or cat herders.

BTW: Einstein, the little grey circle with a '>' sign that was embedded in my post, i.e. your quote, will take you directly to your full post if you click it. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

I don't see where Gman44 posted. But I didn't click the ">" but to make you feel good, I did. Again, I never claimed that was a direct quote anywhere. If I did, I would reference it. "AA" is what i'm using for shorthand for African American. Did you think it was something else?
I'll proceed when you can answer that question.

P...The transition will be good PR for corporate shills, and a no-brainer for consumers.... Originally Posted by Dev Null

I'm sure you can convince the Chinese and Indians to get on board, as they account for a tad over 85% of the world's pollution via two rivers. Good luck with that.

... "AA" is what i'm using for shorthand for African American. ... Originally Posted by Precious_b

No chite Sherlock, [you] and [you] alone done it. So quit trying to make it sound like someone else said it. Thanks for owning up to [your] own racial animus. But attribute it to [you] only, unless you can reference an actual quote elsewhere.

So slumlord activity towards minority tenants, tactics to remove those said tenants in favor of whites, staff issues throughout his business doesn't count...

Are you serious? Originally Posted by Agent220

So you think that rental unit pricing of a commodity is based exclusively on race?!? Not market price?!? Not supply/demand?!? Not ROI?!? Not risk/reward?!? Just race?!? So you think that they teach two type of economics, one for dealing with white folks and a different one for people of color?!? Are you serious?!?

What if, and I'm just spit balling here; what if someone invests their own $$ in a property and wants to get the best reward that the market will bear? What in the flying F**k does that have to do with race?!?
Are you serious?!?

I'm sure you can convince the Chinese and Indians to get on board, as they account for a tad over 85% of the world's pollution via two rivers. Good luck with that. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

You actually hope for something? What y'ah get last Xmas?

No chite Sherlock, [you] and [you] alone done it. So quit trying to make it sound like someone else said it. Thanks for owning up to [your] own racial animus. But attribute it to [you] only, unless you can reference an actual quote elsewhere. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

"chite?" What does cloth have to do with this?
You make things so difficult. Where is that long, lost Grammar Nazi that feigned a presence here?

Rephrase your question, if you are trying to ask me one.

I reread his statement - he did forget to add banning plastic straws to the list. I have to admit that the Dems sure do have their priorities right. **snik** Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

ALthough such an issue is very low on the list of important issues, it does point out that Democrats are much more concerned about environmental issues than Repulicans. Trump, through his many Executive Orders, has done away with many laws put in place by Obama to protect the environment. All in the interests of big business.

How important will this be to voters in November? I have no idea but I can guarantee you that no one who has a deep interest in protecting the environment will vote for Trump.

BTW, an article in the paper today points out that several Republicans are supporting climate control issues because they realize that younger voters are very concerned with it and they need their votes.

I'm sure you can convince the Chinese and Indians to get on board, as they account for a tad over 85% of the world's pollution via two rivers. Good luck with that. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

And Republicans used to be so positive about market-based solutions.

If you build it, they will come.