DSK, if you post dumbass comparisons like this you get slammed by me, no matter your race or sex.
Originally Posted by WTF
You haven't slammed anyone on this board in 10 years but your Austin Reacharound Crew buddies.
Yes I do and unlike you , I even understand what was written. Below is the first sentence in the article...So tell me why you are against the deal. Quote wtf you do not understand and I will try and explain it for you.
It would be a catastrophe for American influence in the world if Congress killed the Iranian nuclear deal.
http://www.masslive.com/opinion/inde...guments_f.html
.
Originally Posted by WTF
No you don't understand what was written. The author himself says to reset the deal. So the author himself is inviting catastrophe for American influence. The "catastrophe" started when Obama went on his "apology tour" near the beginning of his first term and has continued up until this point.
We no longer need their stinking oil.
Originally Posted by WTF
So you are a "flat earther" now.
The issue before congress is not to bother Iran or leave Iran alone. The issue is a vote for or against the Iran nuclear deal. Congress must consider:
A. Vote yes, Iran gets rid of 90% of their Uranium and their ability to make a nuclear weapon gets pushed out 10-15 years. The USA will lift economic sanctions and Iran will have access to their money about 150 billion Dollars.
OR
B. Vote no, The USA keeps the economic sanctions on Iran. Iran will not get access to their money. Iran will get to keep their Uranium, harvest more and will likely have a nuclear bomb in less than 2 years.
Originally Posted by flghtr65
A false choice. There are several issues: Do we trust the Iranians, is the treaty "good", is the treaty enforceable, etc?
But IMO, the deal is done. The sanctions were lifted when the UN voted for the treaty and the money will be be released. Russia is already making missile system deals with Iran. That's why the "snap back" sanctions argument was so laughable as well as you libtard's misplaced trust.