Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

Site facts and sources about the U.S. being the biggest seller of arms to terrorists . Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Seriously? We gave Iran weapons in the 80s. Thanks Reagan. ISIS has repurposed thousands of our weapons and vehicles and are now using them.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...vees-to-syria/

Fox news, so you'll believe it.

We are the global leader in arms sales

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/27..._r=0&referrer=
Seriously? We gave Iran weapons in the 80s. Thanks Reagan. ISIS has repurposed thousands of our weapons and vehicles and are now using them.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...vees-to-syria/

Fox news, so you'll believe it.

We are the global leader in arms sales

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/27..._r=0&referrer= Originally Posted by WombRaider
THAT'S THE WAY TO REACH BACK OVER 30 YEARS FOR THE REAGAN DEAL. WE DON"T SELL THEM TO THOSE ON OUR TERRORIST WATCH LIST PENDEJO !! POBRECITA PUTA, PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS POSTED, CULERO Y LAMBIACHI !!!!! DID YOU GET MORE OF THOSE ROPEY LOADS IN YOUR EYES !!! CHAPETE !!!!
LexusLover's Avatar
We are the global leader in arms sales Originally Posted by WombRaider
Job creation, duffus. You opposed to creating jobs?
LexusLover's Avatar
We need to shrink our military down so we won't be itching to fight everywhere. Originally Posted by DSK
And if "we" completely disarmed, disbanded the military, and closed the Pentagon, everyone would leave us alone. Right? It's working for Obaminable!!! Right?
THAT'S THE WAY TO REACH BACK OVER 30 YEARS FOR THE REAGAN DEAL. WE DON"T SELL THEM TO THOSE ON OUR TERRORIST WATCH LIST PENDEJO !! POBRECITA PUTA, PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS POSTED, CULERO Y LAMBIACHI !!!!! DID YOU GET MORE OF THOSE ROPEY LOADS IN YOUR EYES !!! CHAPETE !!!! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Your caps key is on.......
southtown4488's Avatar
Seriously? We gave Iran weapons in the 80s. Thanks Reagan. ISIS has repurposed thousands of our weapons and vehicles and are now using them.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...vees-to-syria/

Fox news, so you'll believe it.

We are the global leader in arms sales

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/27..._r=0&referrer= Originally Posted by WombRaider


Don't forget about this relationship as well.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
We gave arms to the Syrian Rebels, which became ISIS. We armed bin Laden when he was opposing the Russians in Afghanistan. We armed Egyptian rebels, now the Muslim Brotherhood. We are arming practically every side over there. It's good business. The USA is the biggest arms supplier to terrorists in the world. Wake up! These wars are not about rights or freedom, they are about profits. Immoral, illegal profits. That's why there is no definition of victory. If these wars end, a lot of people will lose money. They won't end.
THAT'S THE WAY TO REACH BACK OVER 30 YEARS FOR THE REAGAN DEAL. WE DON"T SELL THEM TO THOSE ON OUR TERRORIST WATCH LIST PENDEJO !! POBRECITA PUTA, PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS POSTED, CULERO Y LAMBIACHI !!!!! DID YOU GET MORE OF THOSE ROPEY LOADS IN YOUR EYES !!! CHAPETE !!!! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
ISIS has thousands of our weapons and vehicles and they are currently using them.
We gave arms to the Syrian Rebels, which became ISIS. We armed bin Laden when he was opposing the Russians in Afghanistan. We armed Egyptian rebels, now the Muslim Brotherhood. We are arming practically every side over there. It's good business. The USA is the biggest arms supplier to terrorists in the world. Wake up! These wars are not about rights or freedom, they are about profits. Immoral, illegal profits. That's why there is no definition of victory. If these wars end, a lot of people will lose money. They won't end. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Goddammit, you really have to stop. I'm agreeing with you way more than I'm comfortable with

Completely agree. Our weapons find their way into all hands. Rey is blind to the fact that green is the only color anyone cares about.
Job creation, duffus. You opposed to creating jobs? Originally Posted by LexusLover
We gave arms to the Syrian Rebels, which became ISIS. We armed bin Laden when he was opposing the Russians in Afghanistan. We armed Egyptian rebels, now the Muslim Brotherhood. We are arming practically every side over there. It's good business. The USA is the biggest arms supplier to terrorists in the world. Wake up! These wars are not about rights or freedom, they are about profits. Immoral, illegal profits. That's why there is no definition of victory. If these wars end, a lot of people will lose money. They won't end. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You're ok creating jobs by selling arms to terrorists? It's a yes or no question. I know you don't like those.
ISIS has thousands of our weapons and vehicles and they are currently using them. Originally Posted by WombRaider
Thanks to a gutless Iraqi army and your hero odummer not pursuing a status of forces agreement to preserve the gains we had made and the lives that were sacrificed there. Your hero just HAD to have THAT on his legacy that he pulled our troops out of Iraq. HE OWNS creating the conditions for what has become ISIS. His muzzie loving ass threw away all that had been achieved. And don't go on like you lying libs do about Al Maliki and how he wouldn't " play ball " . odummer the swishy walker ( like you !!! ) has shown how gutless he is on the world stage MANY times with his apology tour and his NOT backing up his lying ass words on his " line in the sand" in Syria. Nice try at blaming us for the equipment that the coward Iraqis left for ISIS but that's all on the AND odummer, ya cum guzzler !!!
flghtr65's Avatar
I support leaving Iran alone. They are no threat. They are only a threat if we keep screwing with them. How many countries has Iran attacked, compared to the USA? They are being used as a pawn to justify even more defense spending, and more income in the pockets of war profiteers. If our foreign policy wasn't so stupid, Iran would be our biggest ally in the region, even better than Israel. And all Iran would demand is for us to stay out of their internal affairs. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
The issue before congress is not to bother Iran or leave Iran alone. The issue is a vote for or against the Iran nuclear deal. Congress must consider:

A. Vote yes, Iran gets rid of 90% of their Uranium and their ability to make a nuclear weapon gets pushed out 10-15 years. The USA will lift economic sanctions and Iran will have access to their money about 150 billion Dollars.

OR

B. Vote no, The USA keeps the economic sanctions on Iran. Iran will not get access to their money. Iran will get to keep their Uranium, harvest more and will likely have a nuclear bomb in less than 2 years.
Thanks to a gutless Iraqi army and your hero odummer not pursuing a status of forces agreement to preserve the gains we had made and the lives that were sacrificed there. Your hero just HAD to have THAT on his legacy that he pulled our troops out of Iraq. HE OWNS creating the conditions for what has become ISIS. His muzzie loving ass threw away all that had been achieved. And don't go on like you lying libs do about Al Maliki and how he wouldn't " play ball " . odummer the swishy walker ( like you !!! ) has shown how gutless he is on the world stage MANY times with his apology tour and his NOT backing up his lying ass words on his " line in the sand" in Syria. Nice try at blaming us for the equipment that the coward Iraqis left for ISIS but that's all on the AND odummer, ya cum guzzler !!! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Ray, you are becoming a one trick pony, you need some new material. Lies will not win a point.
DSK, if you post dumbass comparisons like this you get slammed by me, no matter your race or sex. Originally Posted by WTF
You haven't slammed anyone on this board in 10 years but your Austin Reacharound Crew buddies.

Yes I do and unlike you , I even understand what was written. Below is the first sentence in the article...So tell me why you are against the deal. Quote wtf you do not understand and I will try and explain it for you.

It would be a catastrophe for American influence in the world if Congress killed the Iranian nuclear deal.
http://www.masslive.com/opinion/inde...guments_f.html

. Originally Posted by WTF
No you don't understand what was written. The author himself says to reset the deal. So the author himself is inviting catastrophe for American influence. The "catastrophe" started when Obama went on his "apology tour" near the beginning of his first term and has continued up until this point.

We no longer need their stinking oil. Originally Posted by WTF
So you are a "flat earther" now.

The issue before congress is not to bother Iran or leave Iran alone. The issue is a vote for or against the Iran nuclear deal. Congress must consider:

A. Vote yes, Iran gets rid of 90% of their Uranium and their ability to make a nuclear weapon gets pushed out 10-15 years. The USA will lift economic sanctions and Iran will have access to their money about 150 billion Dollars.

OR

B. Vote no, The USA keeps the economic sanctions on Iran. Iran will not get access to their money. Iran will get to keep their Uranium, harvest more and will likely have a nuclear bomb in less than 2 years. Originally Posted by flghtr65
A false choice. There are several issues: Do we trust the Iranians, is the treaty "good", is the treaty enforceable, etc?

But IMO, the deal is done. The sanctions were lifted when the UN voted for the treaty and the money will be be released. Russia is already making missile system deals with Iran. That's why the "snap back" sanctions argument was so laughable as well as you libtard's misplaced trust.
We gave arms to the Syrian Rebels, which became ISIS. We armed bin Laden when he was opposing the Russians in Afghanistan. We armed Egyptian rebels, now the Muslim Brotherhood. We are arming practically every side over there. It's good business. The USA is the biggest arms supplier to terrorists in the world. Wake up! These wars are not about rights or freedom, they are about profits. Immoral, illegal profits. That's why there is no definition of victory. If these wars end, a lot of people will lose money. They won't end. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Thanks to a gutless Iraqi army and your hero odummer not pursuing a status of forces agreement to preserve the gains we had made and the lives that were sacrificed there. Your hero just HAD to have THAT on his legacy that he pulled our troops out of Iraq. HE OWNS creating the conditions for what has become ISIS. His muzzie loving ass threw away all that had been achieved. And don't go on like you lying libs do about Al Maliki and how he wouldn't " play ball " . odummer the swishy walker ( like you !!! ) has shown how gutless he is on the world stage MANY times with his apology tour and his NOT backing up his lying ass words on his " line in the sand" in Syria. Nice try at blaming us for the equipment that the coward Iraqis left for ISIS but that's all on the AND odummer, ya cum guzzler !!! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Obama is US, you fucking dumbass. When you blame him, you are blaming US. And how is Obama at fault for a fucking gutless Iraqi Army? You want more of our men dying in the sand over there for absolutely nothing? You want to continue the fucking war that your man Bush started. We wouldn't even BE in that shithole if it weren't for Shrubya. Don't forget that shit, you cocksucker. Goddamn you're stupid. And how about COG's points, you never addressed those, because your dumbass doesn't have an answer, do you?