Support Slave G with an AVATAR up grade!

We were actually pretty quiet yesterday until one of your minions DDSA started spewing bile again so let's make sure we are clear on who is keeping this going. Originally Posted by a10bomb

One more piece of advice, YOU and the other two stooges were the ones flooding this board with your defense of Slave g. If ya'll would not have started those threads and/or contributed to those threads, would their be anything for me to be commenting on? Well sure Whispers threads. But if you notice I haven't had too much activity on Whispers Threads he started.

It has been said in every way possible, if you CARED that much about her, you would have stepped back and let this blow over. I think Slave needs to question your motives here a little more. What is it truly out of support? Or is their a more sinister plot at hand??

I think Slave needs to question your motives here a little more. What is it truly out of support? Or is their a more sinister plot at hand?? Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Paranoid much...

Paranoid much...

Originally Posted by Netx9

Par for the course here. Take THE ONLY piece of info. out of my reply that doesn't hit home, or speak some truth.

You've said your piece, I've said mine... Blaming us for posting in support of a provider who we believe was unfairly banned and is now being unfairly treated as the reason you keep wanting to comment is just your way of saying you want the last word until everyone agrees with you.... She has over 100 stellar reviews, no 'no-s', and a stellar reputation long before this and long after. No one is making you post... You choose to keep saying the same thing... If you said something new, I might have something to add.

It was quiet yesterday... And you were the first to pop back up. Let me save you some time... Just quote your previous post and put "+1" under it.

One more piece of advice, YOU and the other two stooges were the ones flooding this board with your defense of Slave g. If ya'll would not have started those threads and/or contributed to those threads, would their be anything for me to be commenting on? Well sure Whispers threads. But if you notice I haven't had too much activity on Whispers Threads he started.

It has been said in every way possible, if you CARED that much about her, you would have stepped back and let this blow over. I think Slave needs to question your motives here a little more. What is it truly out of support? Or is their a more sinister plot at hand?? Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Like this...

+1

You've said your piece, I've said mine... Blaming us for posting in support of a provider who we believe was unfairly banned and is now being unfairly treated as the reason you keep wanting to comment is just your way of saying you want the last word until everyone agrees with you.... She has over 100 stellar reviews, no 'no-s', and a stellar reputation long before this and long after. No one is making you post... You choose to keep saying the same thing... If you said something new, I might have something to add.

It was quiet yesterday... And you were the first to pop back up. Let me save you some time... Just quote your previous post and put "+1" under it. Originally Posted by Netx9

Blaming you OR speaking the truth? Or more simply said, stating the obvious. This isn't about her reviews. Or her past. This is about her indiscretions that you so heavily are defending. DISCRETION is and always will be the #1 thing about this hobby of ours. I get it, you say I repeat myself, maybe I do. But why? Because your fellow stooges are doing the same thing. I will say it again. If ya'll would have not bombarded the CoEd section with these threads, would I have anything to be repeating myself on? I don't care if ANYBODY agrees with me. Slave G attempted to call me out just like she did Savak, and now she can pay the consequences. Those consequences would not be going on to this degree, if you and your fellow Slave G. stalkers would practice what you preach. You can preach all day long, but anybody with two eyeballs sees you are guilty of what you are preaching to me.

Unfairly Banned? Unfairly Treated?

That is funny.

You've said your piece, I've said mine... Blaming us for posting in support of a provider who we believe was unfairly banned and is now being unfairly treated as the reason you keep wanting to comment is just your way of saying you want the last word until everyone agrees with you.... She has over 100 stellar reviews, no 'no-s', and a stellar reputation long before this and long after. No one is making you post... You choose to keep saying the same thing... If you said something new, I might have something to add.

It was quiet yesterday... And you were the first to pop back up. Let me save you some time... Just quote your previous post and put "+1" under it. Originally Posted by Netx9

Yes.... She has stellar reviews and a stellar reputation long before this.....

And then in a very short period she imploded........

.... blurted out details of her medical condition
.... Outed personal information about other members.
--- posted information publicly from the mens locker room
.... engaged in an orgy, the public discussion of which show NO regard for a provider concerned with condom changes

it culminated with her being banned after which 4 guys have tried to keep her in the limelight and advertise for her., 3 of whom are not from San Antonio and during which not a single one of her peers has offered up any support.


She is NEVER going to be looked at in the same light Sir. I have 14 years experience on these boards and she will NEVER not be looked at with doubts.

Will she get business? Yes. Some idiots do no research. Just about anyone that DOES research her will be aware of the doubt hat surrounds her as well as her own stated condition and have concern enough to not see her.

All bull shit aside

Slave Guinevere is Indiscreet, Irresponsible and a Health Risk greater than most other choices available. Why would any informed hobbyist want the added risk?

If ya'll would have not bombarded the CoEd section with these threads, would I have anything to be repeating myself on? Originally Posted by DirkDigglerSanAntonio

Get it straight, dirk....

Within hours after her ban, the benevolent and concerned whispers authored 3 posts gloating and celebrating her ban in co-ed:

1:30am...
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015003

2:37am... Baiting her 'supporting cast'
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015024

9:06 am A sarcastic post with the ironic title "put aside bitterness'
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015109

3 threads started within 12 hours of her ban. He couldn't savor whatever perceived victory, however pyrrhic it might be, without saying something full well knowing she can't respond or defend herself. You would have us shut up even though we disagree with you. No law against posting about banned folks so I have no issue with him posting as a practical matter. I just think it was petty and self important. So some guys start some threads who disagree with you... Disagree with him.. and you guys lose it! He scours for any positive comment or picture and drops his knowledge out of some sort of perceived moral high ground. Backup comes out of some hole to aid in that, you look for your spots...

All of the information was already out there... On both sides, so now it becomes a "last word" battle admittedly intended to destroy her reputation. No wonder other providers won't step up publicly and risk the wrath and attention of one of the most classic examples of troll behavior. I don't see any ladies stepping up on your side either so providers-who-agree-with-me count is not a valid metric for the validity of either argument.

Again, all the while, she can't even defend herself. You want a one-sided debate. Calling us stalkers and pimps is as specious a claim as I've ever heard. Stalker necessarily implies 'unwanted' attention and none of our action is directed towards her in any negative way. I suspect your posts are 'unwanted'. Pretty pictures and supportive posts are far from that.

Pimps at least get paid. Management gets a cut. We just get to see you all implode. Again, poor association used by you just to name-call and try to get a rise.

We can disagree... Reasonable people can disagree... W won't have that. The obsessive behavior is on the other side. The stated goal here is to isolate her - not just to let her serve her ban out, and not let anyone say a nice thing without countering it with yet another blast of bile (even if the sig threatening it was removed). Sounds like for us, stalker is just a pejorative, for the rest of you, it's an apt description.

What else do pimps do? They try to get rid of anybody who infringes on their turf... Eliminate the competition. While there is no 'competition' per se (although for a fee, I've heard some like to share their babies), the act of trying to tarnish her reputation sounds a lot more like pimp behavior. I suspect some providers may also be cheering that on privately - you seem to infer that by saying none of her peers have come forward so they must agree. In this case, the pimp hand is an all out scorched earth campaign taken out on here for all to see, all the while, she's not able to explain the errors in the purported medical information being posted and pm-d. She was honest about her condition and gets vilified for it and exacerbated by misinformation, conjecture and innuendo and any other synonym for speculation you can think of.

Back to the top... Get it straight. The aftermath of the ban was started by W. The cease fire yesterday was broken by you.

I suggest we all go back to our corners - we've all reported, now others can decide. Like I said in another post, I believe you when you said you were just trying to help in the beginning with "tough love". I can appreciate that. Others motivations are more sinister (black helicopters circling), and frankly disgusting. I ask you again...

Pretty pictures and 'ads' for a banned member vs Post stalking/pm campaign on a banned member...

I leave to everyone to decide which on is more disgusting.

Last thing... He knew about her condition and in his 'disappointed me' post, admitted to considering seeing her... And had actually proposed it to someone.... Even though she was older than the coeds he prefers. I'm sure he can explain that in his own dissembling way bit in his own words, his reason for changing his mind had only to do with the savak issue and how she handled that situation... Even though her post about her condition had already been made.

Question motives of everyone, not just those who disagree.

Guinevere made mistakes.
Some that her supporters don't bring up. And Whisper ceaselessly loves to hammer any perceived err others make. Even at the overlooking of his mistakes and backhandedly addressing them when brought up, when he chooses to.

Netx9, I like your post #143.

You bring up some new points of view. And rather persuasively (sp) pointing them out.

The big one being, just let things lie. The future will be determined when the period of time has expired and she is an active member of this site again.

Those that continue to bait the issue, especially those not of our town, must have something that is serving their purpose since all other *facts* have been well turned over.

Guinevere made mistakes. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Yup!

The big one being, just let things lie. The future will be determined when the period of time has expired and she is an active member of this site again.

Those that continue to bait the issue, especially those not of our town, must have something that is serving their purpose since all other *facts* have been well turned over. Originally Posted by Precious_b

I suggested in the thread that ads would be met with as much effort in getting the other opinions shared that it all gets dropped...... Pretty much saying..... Drop it all let her serve out her ban and deal with it herself when she returns.. or not....

Last thing... He knew about her condition and in his 'disappointed me' post, admitted to considering seeing her... And had actually proposed it to someone.... Originally Posted by Netx9

I made a joking comment, to her BF at the time, to see just how jealous he was. I've welcomes anyone that can post anything more than that to do so. I do not pay to see old whores. I don't pay to see middle aged providers and SELDOM pay to see some young hot provider. My time and money is mostly spent in a different P4P arena that yields higher quality experiences.

Get it straight, dirk....

Within hours after her ban, the benevolent and concerned whispers authored 3 posts gloating and celebrating her ban in co-ed Originally Posted by Netx9

Get it straight Netx9.......


The threads I started were not to attack Guinevere. None of you come close to discussing facts choosing instead to try to spin....

Thank-you Supporting Players was all about you guys. Those that kept supporting her while she kept screwing up. Just as you have kept it all alive, I'm sure it will be repeated upon her return. No one has done more damage to her reputation than herself, Louigi, Netx9 and A10bomb

In Response to the adhic Advertising Campaign is also in response to none other that Louigi, Netx9 and Still Looking

Comedic Genius was props to JJ for the well placed photo he used.

All about the Fan Club was also all about you guys..... Not about her.

You took someone that was ill equipped for the battle she created for herself and egged her on non stop making her think she was in some way being sharp and witty when all along she stumbled, misread, and exposed way too much about herself and clients....

I suggest we all go back to our corners - we've all reported, now others can decide. Like I said in another post, I believe you when you said you were just trying to help in the beginning with "tough love". I can appreciate that. Others motivations are more sinister (black helicopters circling), and frankly disgusting. I ask you again...

Pretty pictures and 'ads' for a banned member vs Post stalking/pm campaign on a banned member...

I leave to everyone to decide which on is more disgusting. Originally Posted by Netx9

Banned Providers should NOT benefit from the board.

You focus on the personal Next9

Why can't you take a step back and look at the basic facts.

She outed people. She posted Locker Room contents. She is banned.

Why do you think she deserves a pass on outing people?

Yes. I will ALWAYS respond when you or anyone else comments about me. ALWAYS. If you do not want to hear my opinion, leave my stated views out of things.

I'm not saying it will mean total silence from me but in this case, regarding Guinevere.... I would have left this alone days ago,,,,

Ive said more than once..... let the other ladies have the spotlight for a while.

We can continue this when she returns......

She called me out on some things as well as has twisted and lied about others and the thread was locked. When she returns, if she admits the error in her judgement and chooses to go forward leaving me out of it I can do the same thing..... But if she continues to seek my attention I will provide it......

And for gods sake man,...... What would this place look like if every guy with a favorite provider ran non stop ads and posted non stop pictures of that provider....

No rule against it? There should be Ads belong in the ad section and should be run by the ladies. NOT every guy that wants their attention.

Banned Providers should NOT benefit from the board.
I must have missed that guideline somewhere


She outed people. She posted Locker Room contents. She is banned.
and yet you continuously violate guideline #16 and you are still here
#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.

And don't give me that crap about her wanting to discuss her illness anytime because you continue to post about her health even though she is banned and you continue to speculate about what you think she has in order to tarnish her reputation I mean you even had it in your sig lineand you were pm'ing people about it but you are still here

Why do you think she deserves a pass on outing people?
And why do you deserve to continue to post what you post and send out pm's about what you believe is her health situation


And for gods sake man,...... What would this place look like if every guy with a favorite provider ran non stop ads and posted non stop pictures of that provider....

That's not your decision to make nor is it mine but we have not broken any guide lines and heaven forbid that what you like to call a hooker board
have pictures of hookers how does NikkiWhite say it THE HORROR!!!

No rule against it? There should be Ads belong in the ad section and should be run by the ladies. NOT every guy that wants their attention.



Originally Posted by Whispers

Why who would they be hurting didn't we already have this discussion about ThreADs and wasn't it already settled that ThreADs are allowed plus what I really don't understand is why you even care what goes on in the San Antonio coed, provider ads weekends ads sandbox or any other area of this board other than the SugarDaddy/SugarBaby board by your own admission most of the women here you probably wouldn't see anyway most of the women that post here are past your self imposed age limit. All you do is come down here and start drama. I am sure someone has said it to you before if you don't like the way the guidelines are then start your own board.

Why who would they be hurting didn't we already have this discussion about ThreADs and wasn't it already settled that ThreADs are allowed plus what I really don't understand is why you even care what goes on in the San Antonio coed, provider ads weekends ads sandbox or any other area of this board other than the SugarDaddy/SugarBaby board by your own admission most of the women here you probably wouldn't see anyway most of the women that post here are past your self imposed age limit.

That is a long sentence man!

All you do is come down here and start drama. I am sure someone has said it to you before if you don't like the way the guidelines are then start your own board.
Originally Posted by a10bomb

I don't need to! This one provides a tremendous amount of information as well as entertainment!

And my involvement in THIS particular Slave G Production was all by her personal request since the beginning of the fiasco....

The threads I started were not to attack Guinevere... Originally Posted by Whispers

I said they were gloating and celebrating... Let's see what you said... Doesn't matter who you addressed them too, you still repeated the same accusations as before the ban.

1:30am...
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015003

OK.... For those of you that have not followed one of most entertaining Provider Melt-Downs in years you cannot begin to appreciate shear genius of the below quoted post.

I KNOW it's fucking genius because I was waiting to see the "BANNED" happen so that I could post the Original Picture that initiated the melt-down.

Gloating... Celebrating... Threatening to post the pic already edited by staff....

2:37am... Baiting her 'supporting cast'*
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015024

it did not matter to you that she was wrong.
it did not matter to you that she was outing personal info
it did not matter to you that as she escalated she looked more and more a fool

you encouraged her at every step....

wouldn't anyone that remotely gave a damn about her have not simply PMed her and let her know how futile it was to go down the path she chose.?

As I have said more than once....

to each and every one of you..... .Thank-you..... you play your parts so well and much credit for her finally crossing those lines rests with you.....

"thank you"... Gloating, saying she was wrong, etc, yet again attacking her... Pretty obvious - regardless of you you addressed it to.

9:06 am A sarcastic post with the ironic title "put aside bitterness'
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1015109

The Genius displayed in how they reclaimed the Spotlight amidst all their health problems and poor decisions needs to be recognized.

Another dig at G about health...

It's like you don't read what you yourself say sometimes and and just stick to some script. Savak's own proclivities are on display in his own reviews... Where rick could se them. She outed nothing not already on here... She didn't out ml content... She commented on ml content already in coed. I disagree with your assessment...

The pomposity with which you proclaim some high ground here is staggering at times. You don't see providers... You don't review... You're not an E-scort or C-lient... You just look for, stir, and make controversy on this site... The services of which you don't even use. Why are you here? To say you've been on "the boards" for 15 years next year?

If you want to hear the sound of your own voice, might I suggest singing in the shower.

That is all.

... That is all. Originally Posted by Netx9

That's nice.