Buying Sex in Texas Is Now a Felony

just like escort service. someone never agree to pay for sex
Look at the Houston DA overriding a judge to get a grand jury to go after a doctor who simply gave out covid vaccines right before they spoiled. Imagine if this lady gets hold of your case... Law for the sake of law, power for the sake of power.
Wow, this sucks; I agree with the above in I can't wait for a city, county or state politician to get popped.
I jumped on here to research a provider before I called her and thank goodness my old girlfriend from about a year ago just called me out of the blue.... she's either horny, needing money or both!!!
Read one way they want to catch guys is through ATMs. ATMs that are part if of the message place or close to. They are going to look for the pattern. Think ill be getting my cash from a distance now Originally Posted by Doug4343
Excellent plan of theirs getting a search warrant for financials is easy. If they see you regularly withdrawing 200 bucks for what should be a 80 dollar massage you're pretty suspect. Maybe the AMPs and Studios need to start taking crypto as payment that's a little more difficult to track.
There are k girls in Vegas, read the reviews. There are many other sources as well, just not as convenient for you.
I will miss the amps and I wish them all the best, but you must be prepared for change.
Do NOT worry about past reviews , I always start mine with explaining a fantasy I had...always wondered why everyone else didn’t do the same and was so blunt...use your head fools.
A #200 withdrawal doesn’t mean squat, it’s your money
Does this new law mean that a sugar baby can accuse someone of paying or offering to pay her for fun, and she can press charges, or if she is arrested on some other felony charge, she can make a deal with police to set up a client in return for a reduced sentence for herself?

Just thinking out loud, I see ways this new law could motivate police to score numerous felony convictions across a wide spectrum of social life, not just AMPs or at P411... even reviewing a lady would seem risky to do.

Many of these ladies get in their own trouble engaging in nefarious non-hobby activities. I do know its standard practice to offer them deals if they can set up three probable cause felony arrests for police. Originally Posted by Buckwiser
Very very valid point
A #200 withdrawal doesn’t mean squat, it’s your money Originally Posted by Cali-or-Bust
It's probable cause and enough to get you investigate by the DA to try and find any patterns in your finances. It just depends on how aggressively the local DA wants to enforce this I'll conceived law.
Ralph Fults's Avatar
It's probable cause and enough to get you investigate by the DA to try and find any patterns in your finances. It just depends on how aggressively the local DA wants to enforce this I'll conceived law. Originally Posted by twitch760
Your logic is a little circular. To find out about your cash withdrawals the DA would already need to have access to your finances.
Perhaps I'm going off track here but I'm beginning to think this new law is like a form of cultural imperialism. The workers swear up and down over and over they're not being trafficked and that they're not psychologically harmed. Really no one's getting harmed in any consistent way.

Yet there are activists that take a stance that anyone involved in sex work is being harmed arbitrarily no matter what, even if it's a racy picture in a Cosmo magazine or something. And when you dig deeper you see that it's just them buying into a world where women cannot be sex objects and men who see women as sex objects only see them as sex objects. This sort of understanding of humanity comes from a religious stance or some sort of dualist stance where of the flesh is bad and of the spirit is good. Any scientific understanding would show that we're all just atoms, one body fluid isn't much different than another, and the concept of purity is completely culturally bound.

Anyway the cultural imperialism comes in in that they see themselves as advanced and knowledgeable in psychology and trauma and whatnot and that they're really just trying to save everyone from themselves that engage in any sort of commercial sexual experience. To me it doesn't seem much different versus the Victorian era British going into some country and taking them over on the grounds that they need to stop polygamy and what not. In our case they justify locking someone up and throwing away the key somehow for the sake of preventing people from losing their freedom. It is an irony really that people will lose their freedom allegedly for people to gain their freedom even though there's no obvious mechanism that will lead to anyone gaining anything other than the non-for-profit leaders getting a bigger cut in their donations and lawyers and jailers grabbing some more cash.
Your logic is a little circular. To find out about your cash withdrawals the DA would already need to have access to your finances. Originally Posted by Ralph Fults
If he pulls all the transactions from the ATM machine at the spa and sees 200 dollar withdrawals from a place that only charges 80 dollars. It's not hard for them to guess what's going on there. That would give them plenty of cause to obtain a search warrant for the rest of your financials and see what you've been up to. Then the arrest warrant comes and you're up shit creek.
Just because he pulled 200 out doesnt mean he spent it there.
Theres atm's everywhere. You dont have to spend your money there to use the atm.
withdraw 200$ every week or day mean nothing, i could spend all in doughnuts if you know what i mean
texassapper's Avatar
Perhaps I'm going off track here but I'm beginning to think this new law is like a form of cultural imperialism. Originally Posted by Big Ed
Yeah, you're off track. This is about nothing more than political posturing... I mean who's going to vote against trafficking amiright? The fact that the law does nothing to stop trafficking is beside the point... that's what politicians do... make meaningless gestures.

If they wanted to stop trafficking, they'd come down on FB... but zuckerbucks talk. I mean FB can manage to prevent you from saying trump won or Covid is a scam, but they can't stop underage porn? C'mon.

They just don't care to.
Joddxxx's Avatar
I just saw a friend of mine that we talked about the subject matter. She’s quitting and got a real job. She told me she’s not taking a chance after September 1st. You do know they will use someone or place as an example to enforce the law.