Many guys here sneak, hide, cheat, lie, fuck around on their wives... behind their backs.* Some say it because they don't get any or enough sex at home.* Most of them are probably the primary bread winner in the home... but many also expect their wives to have jobs to help supplement the household income.* Many of these guys expect their wives to work part/full-time, take care of the home and children... all the while, enjoying the benefits of fucking strange hobby pussy.This is in line with what I was starting to wonder. If a guy is supported by his SO in a job other than as a provider is he still the equivalent of a pimp? If not why? Unless you are saying that the job of being a provider is wrong there is no difference.
It seems to me they are profiting sexually from their wives' work... if she didn't work, he might not be able to afford to be paying for strange hobby pussy.* Could that be considered Pimpish?
These are the guys discussing hobby morality! Originally Posted by MrGiz
I define a pimp as more of a parasite that lives off of the provider without providing any value in return. I could see scenarios where the provider is the primary income earner but the SO provides support and income in other ways. That scenario would not fall into the pimp catagory.
I am not sure I could have a relationship like that but since I have never tried I would not say no. Either way I would not criticize someone that was in such a relationship as long as they were not a parasite.