Dammit, tbonetas

and you can put a key board in front of a blowhard has been and you still have D_J. Originally Posted by notanewbie

Thanks.

I thought I was on ignore.
Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

No.... Boredman is on ignore.....

Don't tell him. Unless you've got stripper heels in your closet, that refrigerated fanny pack becomes fair game. ijs

IQ and Mensa were perhaps the wrong metrics to measure this board. Emotional maturity. That is what has clearly gone missing. Then again it is a board dedicated to discussing hookers and johns...

I love you degenerates. :warmnfuzzy:

IQ and Mensa were perhaps the wrong metrics to measure this board. Emotional maturity. That is what has clearly gone missing. Then again it is a board dedicated to discussing hookers and johns... Originally Posted by BatteriesNotIncluded

Really BNI, you think that discussing all POV's lacks emotional maturity? bp may not like defending his list but to shut down any challenge to his motives for posting the list is emotionally immature IMHO. The boards were different back in the day, not sure one could say better or worse as a whole. Just different. Maybe they were better for you, that is really the only person you can speak for. Right?

Yep.

EQ not IQ.

4 year olds have POVs too. Doesn't make them relevant. So does my dog. Probably higher EQ than we witness here today.

Yep.

EQ not IQ.

4 year olds have POVs too. Doesn't make them relevant. So does my dog. Probably higher EQ than we witness here today. Originally Posted by BatteriesNotIncluded

What's not relivant about calling a grift out? The grift is germaine in that is about a shoplifter and ladies selling a service? Seems reasonable and mature to me.

Yep.

EQ not IQ.

4 year olds have POVs too. Doesn't make them relevant. So does my dog. Probably higher EQ than we witness here today. Originally Posted by BatteriesNotIncluded

Minors don't belong on this site, just to be safe we should extend that to include using them as references or metaphors...... hookerville and kids just dont mix.

I noticed that you're a moderator, and I also saw a link to ECCIE forum guidelines in your signature. I just read through the first 5 of them and was aghast about the example that you're setting with your abusive conduct toward a member.

You also went off on blowpop on another thread and he questioned if you had the proper temperament for a moderator. Another moderator (non Houston) jumped to your defense. I was surprised at your conduct in that thread, but put if off to you having a bad day. Also, you more or less apologized later in that thread.

Now this post...................maybe blowpop was correct about your temperament.

Perhaps at 56 years old 'gramps' views things in a different manner. I always thought moderators were supposed to the 'voice of reason' and set an example for others with their postings. This being said, if a moderator can go off on others, as you've done here, you send out a message to others that if a moderator can go off on others, then the regular members can also go off on others.

It makes the link of ECCIE forum guidelines in your signature nothing but a big joke. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

You say censor, I say set an example. By the way, as long as you're a moderator, you should be held to higher standards than us regular members. You're a part of board management, you have rites (edit function, give/remove points, possibly the rite to ban members, etc.) that us everyday members don't have.



Your 'at worst.....longwinded.......... ' come on. Not only that, until I saw you going off on him in another thread with 'super moderator' listed above your avatar, I never really noticed you as anything but a long term member. By the way, this isn't about blowpop.



Yea, like any of your other moderator buddies will post something in the public forums about your abusive attitude. No doubt there is a moderator only forum where you guys can discuss things and maybe someone will say something there, but no way will they say anything in a public forum about your conduct as a moderator.

By the way, here is your post where you called blowpop "longwinded" at worst.



#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here...........

#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums................

#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks................. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

Gotta love the helpful citizens who tell the mods how to do their jobs. Coincidentally, they're often the ones who make extra work for the mods. Go figure. Originally Posted by blowpop

Sorry BP, as hard as I tried, I could only get the system to accept 1 'like'.




I guess if I were on hiatus from the board and I just came back, I would ease back into the ebb and flow of the site, instead of making a post like I'm 'somebody' within the first week of my return. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

According to your own advice shouldn't you have just PM's enderwiggin?
The hypocrisy becomes more evident every day.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=697949 The link to the entire thread where you seemed to feel that that I shouldn't do exactly what you are doing now. Just in case you have forgotten in your advancing state.

According to your own advice shouldn't you have just PM's enderwiggin?
The hypocrisy becomes more evident every day.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=697949 The link to the entire thread where you seemed to feel that that I shouldn't do exactly what you are doing now. Just in case you have forgotten in your advancing state. Originally Posted by boardman

You seem to be carrying a grudge because when you came back I didn't bow down and kiss your royal ass. Frankly I didn't miss you or all your stupid cat bullshit. However since the thread you linked, I kept my distance from your postings and tried to live and let live.

In order to be fair, let me toss a coin in the air to see if I should care what you think.............flips coin..........and it lands on I don't give a shit what you think.

At least you had a 50/50 chance.

Yep.

EQ not IQ.

4 year olds have POVs too. Doesn't make them relevant. So does my dog. Probably higher EQ than we witness here today. Originally Posted by BatteriesNotIncluded

I didn't say IQ.

My question is who decides whose POV is revelant?

I may not like a persons POV but they are entitled to it, just as you are yours.

If you think your dog has a higher EQ, let him/her posts and we can all decide for ourself.

That is my point. Let folks post (within the rules) their POV.

Some folks think what they think about bp top ten, bp can counter. Each member can decide for themself which POV they agree with. All I have ever thought best was the free flow of POV's. Some I agree with , some I don't.

My POV in this matter is that bp can work out any deal all parties agree to. If some chick wants in on his list because she thinks it will drive up business and wants to pay to blow him, big deal. That is their business. If they decide that did not work out to their advantage, then bp has taught them a good lesson.

My other POV is that if other members want to point out that bp list may not reflect how other members will pay for the same service, nothing wrong with that.

It seems many members take their POV way to serious.

Ha! Keep going DJ...it's a joy to see what you've become.

Ha! Keep going DJ...it's a joy to see what you've become. Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Trust me little fellow, I have it in me. I just prefer to keep out of the abyss.