I knew you'd go back to 1053, been waiting. You're trying to pick a nit you feel is material between real GDP and measured GDP and that's why it's adorable.
Ponder X-M more and consider the impact and timing of front-loaded inventory
The rest of the fluff with you trying to assert dominance and save face isn't relevant. Eyes on the ball. Command of the facts.
As for the AP article, good, you finally picked that nit. You've shown that there's multiple means of framing the data. Sadly, you learned tbe wrong lesson but I know you can do better
It's kind of like this opinion piece
https://community.triblive.com/news/3976013
You and the writer have some framing issues in your tariff takes because of extreme rationalization to justify them as positive. He's a much more effective messenger, though. So feel free to crib from it.
Focus on the totality. Focus on what was promised. Focus on that TACO trend. Focus on the way it was framed by the administration. Look at the wild varying logic they've produced and remember there are other reasons to question the data and how it's used.
You haven't asked yet if Trump knows what a 3 month moving average is. Might want to check on that