Man forced to shit in front of cops, given forced digital anal probing, Xrays, and 3 enemas without consent (Lawsuits pending) I shit you not...LOL (pun intended)

Keep posting your Confederate propaganda. Your whole Confederacy was about nothing more than slavery. Your whole argument as to Mr. Lincoln promulgating the war for something other than Union in 1861 is a fiction and a lie, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

LIAR. AGAIN.

I never made ANY argument about Lincoln's motives. You are trying to put words into my mouth. Like you always do when you are losing an argument.

My argument has been that every Confederate state cited slavery preservation as a reason for secession. You keep trying to change the subject to what Lincoln wanted to do. That's what you do when you are losing - change the subject.

He won't. You just hit close to the bone. You obviously do not know the race of the last Confederate general officer to surrender his field command, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

WTF????

Who gives a shit? What does that have to do with why the South seceded? Or anything else in this thread?

Once again, you are changing the subject, because you are losing the argument.

LMAO In Bred (IB) Hankering showed up for his daily ass kicking. Greetings tranny fucker. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Your defective intelligence leaves you most unqualified to be the judge of anything, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and you really shouldn't call the racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass' sister a "tranny", Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

LIAR. AGAIN. The OP in your thread (not THIS thread) was a lie based on the inane ravings of a Yankee comedian, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Further, IBH never attended a "Tea Party" rally and never carried the "Stars and Bars", and you lie when your racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass claims that he did, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. So look in the mirror and you'll see the real liar, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

I never made ANY argument about Lincoln's motives. You're lying again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
You are trying to put words into my mouth. You're lying again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument -- about Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, @:

It is evident that the OP is ignorant of the Confederacy and the war for states rights.
He probably thinks it was a war over slavery.
Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Of course it was. Originally Posted by ExNYer

Like you always do when you are losing an argument. That's your tactic, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Note your OP, in YOUR thread, says nothing about what you now "claim" was "your argument" the whole time, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

My argument has been that every Confederate state cited slavery preservation as a reason for secession. Already proved your fallacious assertion a lie, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. And note that your OP, in YOUR thread, says nothing about what you now "claim" was "your argument" the whole time, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. You're deflecting again, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. You keep trying to change the subject to what Lincoln wanted to do. . Already proved your fallacious assertion a lie, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Already cited above, and in several other places, where you "changed the subject" in YOUR thread, and argued about why Mr. Lincoln promulgated his war at post #18 in the other thread, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass: http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18 . That's what you do when you are losing - change the subject. Already proved your fallacious assertion a lie, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Already cited above, and in several other places, where you "changed the subject" in YOUR thread, and argued about why Mr. Lincoln promulgated his war at post #18 in the other thread, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass: http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18 .

WTF???? . His name was General Stand Watie, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. He was Cherokee, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, and he commanded a large contingent of Native Americans for the Confederacy against the Yankees. So you can take your preconceived "stereotypical" notion of who fought for the Confederacy and why and shove it up your ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Who gives a shit? What does that have to do with why the South seceded? Or anything else in this thread? You'd do well to note that your present argument in this thread has nothing at all to do with the OP in "this thread", you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. You initiated this exchange in this thread with one of your obsessive, juvenile insults, you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Your ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass hijacked this thread and "changed" the subject with your obsessive, juvenile insults, you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Once again, you are changing the subject, because you are losing the argument. . Your ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass "changed" the subject with your obsessive, juvenile, insult, you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
Originally Posted by ExNYer

Could you please repeat that, private IBBenjamin?

I believe you work in a coal mine (or at least in a coal chute). Ai may be wrong, but one thing I of which I am positive is that you DO NOT WRITE BUMPER STICKERS, you verbose blowhard!

TWENTY FIVE instances of "you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass." Minimum. Variations thereof probably get it closer to 30. BTW -- why is his ASS so important to you, IBIdiot?

Originally Posted by ExNYer
I never made ANY argument about Lincoln's motives. You're lying again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Bullshit. Here is Post No. 18:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=18

It never mentions Lincoln and I never made any arguments about his motives.

Originally Posted by ExNYer
You are trying to put words into my mouth. You're lying again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument -- about Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, @: Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer
Quote:
Originally Posted by The2Dogs
It is evident that the OP is ignorant of the Confederacy and the war for states rights.
He probably thinks it was a war over slavery.

Of course it was. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Where does that mention Lincoln or his motives, shit head?

You continue to make stuff up. Because you have lost the argument.

Originally Posted by ExNYer
WTF???? . His name was General Stand Watie, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. He was Cherokee, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, and he commanded a large contingent of Native Americans for the Confederacy against the Yankees. So you can take your preconceived "stereotypical" notion of who fought for the Confederacy and why and shove it up your ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Who gives a shit? What does that have to do with why the South seceded? Or anything else in this thread? You'd do well to note that your present argument in this thread has nothing at all to do with the OP in "this thread", you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. You initiated this exchange in this thread with one of your obsessive, juvenile insults, you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Your ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass hijacked this thread and "changed" the subject with your obsessive, juvenile insults, you ignorant, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So, you concede that it has nothing to do with why the South seceded. Good.

I guess you were trying to tell us you're not a racist because some of your best friends are Cherokee Indians, is that it?

Could you please repeat that, private IBBenjamin?

I believe you work in a coal mine (or at least in a coal chute). Ai may be wrong, but one thing I of which I am positive is that you DO NOT WRITE BUMPER STICKERS, you verbose blowhard!

TWENTY FIVE instances of "you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass." Minimum. Variations thereof probably get it closer to 30. BTW -- why is his ASS so important to you, IBIdiot?
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It's visibly posted and accessible 24/7, you dumb-fuck golem jackass. So read it again at your ignorant leisure, you dumb-fuck golem jackass.

Bullshit. Here is Post No. 18:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=18

It never mentions Lincoln and I never made any arguments about his motives. That's a fucking disingenuous deflection, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln's call to arms, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Where does that mention Lincoln or his motives, shit head? More fucking disingenuous deflection, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln's call to arms, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln sending forces south to violate the sovereignty of those states, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

You continue to make stuff up. Because you have lost the argument. Still more fucking disingenuous deflection, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln's call to arms, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

So, you concede that it has nothing to do with why the South seceded. Good. That asinine assertion of yours was proved intellectually delinquent days ago, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

I guess you were trying to tell us you're not a racist because some of your best friends are Cherokee Indians, is that it? Demonstrating that your a factually challenged, ignorant baboon isn't being a racist, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by ExNYer

In Bred Hankering is a ass man, he appears here daily to get his ass handed to him. When he isn't here he can be found in front of the simian cages whacking off.

Only nine instances of "you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass."

How about take your bag of shit and go home, IBIdiot!

You're not winning. You won't win. But you are pissing everybody off.

And making a fool out of you is becoming so commonplace, it isn't even fun anymore.

Originally Posted by ExNYer Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Bullshit. Here is Post No. 18:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount= 18

It never mentions Lincoln and I never made any arguments about his motives. That's a fucking disingenuous deflection, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln's call to arms, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You got caught in a LIE about Post No. 18 and your answer is that I am engaged in a deflection?

Why can't you just admit you were wrong? I never said anything about Lincoln. You are just trying to put words in my mouth. Like you always do.

And there would have been no war if the South hadn't seceded in the first place, tranny fucker.

And if Lincoln hadn't acted, there would be no United States. Are you OK with that?

I bet you are because whites would be in complete control of at least the Southern states, right?

Originally Posted by ExNYer
Where does that mention Lincoln or his motives, shit head? More fucking disingenuous deflection, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln's call to arms, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. There wouldn't have been a war were it not for Mr. Lincoln sending forces south to violate the sovereignty of those states, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The southern state never had any sovereignty to begin with tranny fucker. They gave that up when they joined the US and ratified the Constitution.

I guess you were trying to tell us you're not a racist because some of your best friends are Cherokee Indians, is that it? Demonstrating that your a factually challenged, ignorant baboon isn't being a racist, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually, you are logically challenged. You throw in unrelated and irrelevant trivia about the race of the last Confederate general to surrender and you think that is somehow related to the causes of the Civil War?

Only you, tranny fucker. Only you.

In Bred Hankering is a ass man, he appears here daily to get his ass handed to him. When he isn't here he can be found in front of the simian cages whacking off. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

No one goes to the prosimian cages in the zoo to watch you fap, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Check the hyperlink in the signature below, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you're the only one in the forum to claim you're a devolving ape!

... bag of shit ... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Now the dumb-fuck golem jackass is posting about his "selfies"!

You got caught in a LIE about Post No. 18 and your answer is that I am engaged in a deflection? You're the one lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives -- and it was Mr. Lincoln's decision to send troops against the South, and his cause was "Union", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Why can't you just admit you were wrong? I never said anything about Lincoln. You are just trying to put words in my mouth. Like you always do. You're lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 (http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18) in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

And there would have been no war if the South hadn't seceded in the first place, tranny fucker. There wouldn't have been a war if Mr. Lincoln hadn't promulgated a war for Union, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, and you really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass

And if Lincoln hadn't acted, there would be no United States. Are you OK with that? Your question is what you term "deflection" and "changing the subject, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

I bet you are because whites would be in complete control of at least the Southern states, right? Your question is what you term "deflection" and "changing the subject", you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

The southern state never had any sovereignty to begin with tranny fucker. There wouldn't have been a war if Mr. Lincoln hadn't promulgated a war for Union, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, and you really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. They gave that up when they joined the US and ratified the Constitution. That's a bald face lie, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, especially as it pertained to state sovereignty in the mid-nineteenth century.

Actually, you are logically challenged. You throw in unrelated and irrelevant trivia about the race of the last Confederate general to surrender and you think that is somehow related to the causes of the Civil War? Your racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass has repeatedly defined Confederates as "100% lily white", but when the factual evidence doesn't jive with your distorted, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee asshole view of the world you deflect and say "it's irrelevant", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. It's you who is "irrelevant", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Only you, tranny fucker. Only you. You really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by ExNYer

Sixteen times he uses the same phrase in the above post.

I think he's on auto-pile-it!

You got caught in a LIE about Post No. 18 and your answer is that I am engaged in a deflection? You're the one lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives -- and it was Mr. Lincoln's decision to send troops against the South, and his cause was "Union", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Why can't you just admit you were wrong? I never said anything about Lincoln. You are just trying to put words in my mouth. Like you always do. You're lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 (http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18) in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are a lying tranny fuckee.

I made no argument whatsoever about Lincoln's motives in Post No. 18. If you think I did, the POST the argument I made, you liar.

Post No. 18 is about the Declarations of Secession of the southern states, particularly South Carolina's. It mentions NOTHING about Lincoln or his motivations.

And there would have been no war if the South hadn't seceded in the first place, tranny fucker. There wouldn't have been a war if Mr. Lincoln hadn't promulgated a war for Union, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, and you really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass

And if Lincoln hadn't acted, there would be no United States. Are you OK with that? Your question is what you term "deflection" and "changing the subject, you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

I bet you are because whites would be in complete control of at least the Southern states, right? Your question is what you term "deflection" and "changing the subject", you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You have ALREADY deflected and changed the subject by trying to switch to Lincoln's motives rather than the slavery preservation motives of the Confederate states.

Actually, you are logically challenged. You throw in unrelated and irrelevant trivia about the race of the last Confederate general to surrender and you think that is somehow related to the causes of the Civil War? Your racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass has repeatedly defined Confederates as "100% lily white", but when the factual evidence doesn't jive with your distorted, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee asshole view of the world you deflect and say "it's irrelevant", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. It's you who is "irrelevant", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I repeatedly defined Confederates as "100% lily white"? Post links, tranny fuckee.

And, in any event, how would that change the fact that the Southern states were trying to preserve slavery? How does a Cherokee general rebut my point about slavery preservation?

In Bred Hankering will stand with his hominid cousins and have a circle jerk. He has been elected with a large majority as the pivot man. Wear your election proudly.

hey, congrats on that IB

Make sure you save the LINK!

LMAO!!!!

Sixteen times he uses the same phrase in the above post.

I think he's on auto-pile-it! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Meanwhile, you're the by-product of a "Pile Driver", you dumb-fuck golem jackass: the cocktail your mommy drank composed of vodka mixed with prune-juice just before she had you.

You are a lying tranny fuckee. You really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

I made no argument whatsoever about Lincoln's motives in Post No. 18. If you think I did, the POST the argument I made, you liar. You're the one lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives -- because it was Mr. Lincoln's decision to send troops against the South, not vice versa, and his cause was "Union", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

Post No. 18 is about the Declarations of Secession of the southern states, particularly South Carolina's. It mentions NOTHING about Lincoln or his motivations. You're the one lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 (http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18) in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives -- and it was Mr. Lincoln's decision to send troops against the South, not vice versa, and his cause was "Union", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

It is evident that the OP is ignorant of the Confederacy and the war for states rights.
He probably thinks it was a war over slavery. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Of course it was. Originally Posted by ExNYer

You have ALREADY deflected and changed the subject by trying to switch to Lincoln's motives rather than the slavery preservation motives of the Confederate states. You're the one lying and deflecting again, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, because you DID make an argument -- a false argument @ post 18 (http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1054333172&postcount=18) in YOUR thread -- about Mr. Lincoln's motives -- and it was Mr. Lincoln's decision to send troops against the South, not vice versa, and his cause was "Union", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

It is evident that the OP is ignorant of the Confederacy and the war for states rights.
He probably thinks it was a war over slavery. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Of course it was. Originally Posted by ExNYer

I repeatedly defined Confederates as "100% lily white"? Post links,

Yup, Arkansas was trying to preserve slavery, too. They were even hoping to expand the operation into the Caribbean. Redneck fuckers. Originally Posted by ExNYer

tranny fuckee. You really shouldn't call your cheap, double-bagger, whoring-sister a "tranny", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass

And, in any event, how would that change the fact that the Southern states were trying to preserve slavery? Just illustrating another piece of ignorance that your, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee ass moronically clings to and treats as "fact", you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.

How does a Cherokee general rebut my point about slavery preservation? Do you really think Stand Watie and all of the other Native Americans under his banner went to war to preserve slavery, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass? Do you really think the Irish stevedores and wharf rats in New Orleans went to war to preserve slavery, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass? Originally Posted by ExNYer

hey, congrats on that IB Originally Posted by JCM800

Make sure you save the LINK!

LMAO!!!! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Doesn't it upset your boyfriend the way you're always looking for new "links", you dumb-fuck golem jackass?

In Bred Hankering will stand with his hominid cousins and have a circle jerk. He has been elected with a large majority as the pivot man. Wear your election proudly. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Again, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, no one goes to the prosimian cages in the zoo to watch you fap, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, you're still the only one in the forum to claim you're a devolving ape: