Guys- you're not gay but you fantasize about giving blow jobs

I’m curious. I guess I can understand the Neanderthal anti gay historians and bigotry on the part of some. Ignorance and hatred abound in our society and it’s duddenly become acceptable in the past two years to voice it again.

But apart from that, why is it important to label the original poster as “gay” or “not gay”. It seems obvious that there is a very wide range of human sexual behavior and that most of us find a relative narrow band of that desireable. Others enjoy a bit wider slice. I would say that gay is a standard label for a make who exclusively, or almost exclusively enjoys sex with men. The original poster doesn’t seem to be seeking that at all. He seems to have, at most, a mild bi-sexual curriosity. But why does it seem so important to so many to label him and do so inaccurately?

Not my cup of tea at all, but I wish him the best, and don’t feel any compulsion to label the behavior. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

As a fellow liberal I’m pretty much always on your side. In this case, though, I think the aversion of the OP to be labeled is what labels him. When he says “I’m not gay but I want to suck dick”. Well, that’s gay. Not judging you and I don’t care that you are, but you are. It reminds me of someone who says “I’m not racist but” . . . Yeah, the next part of the sentence probably makes you racist. Or “I’m not sexist but”. Again, pretty sure you think less of women. TBH, I really don’t care what you are. Just own it.

I’m curious. I guess I can understand the Neanderthal anti gay historians and bigotry on the part of some. Ignorance and hatred abound in our society and it’s duddenly become acceptable in the past two years to voice it again.

But apart from that, why is it important to label the original poster as “gay” or “not gay”. It seems obvious that there is a very wide range of human sexual behavior and that most of us find a relative narrow band of that desireable. Others enjoy a bit wider slice. I would say that gay is a standard label for a make who exclusively, or almost exclusively enjoys sex with men. The original poster doesn’t seem to be seeking that at all. He seems to have, at most, a mild bi-sexual curriosity. But why does it seem so important to so many to label him and do so inaccurately?

Not my cup of tea at all, but I wish him the best, and don’t feel any compulsion to label the behavior.

A sensible reply

The OP said a Transgender dick would not do, he must have a latent gay propensity.

As a fellow liberal I’m pretty much always on your side. In this case, though, I think the aversion of the OP to be labeled is what labels him. When he says “I’m not gay but I want to suck dick”. Well, that’s gay. Not judging you and I don’t care that you are, but you are. It reminds me of someone who says “I’m not racist but” . . . Yeah, the next part of the sentence probably makes you racist. Or “I’m not sexist but”. Again, pretty sure you think less of women. TBH, I really don’t care what you are. Just own it. Originally Posted by Barrymccockinner

Seems like he’d be bi-sexual. There seems to be great reluctance on the part of both men and women to recognize bi-sexual as a legitimate orientation. There’s been some sociological and psychological research on the topic, but this is the first time I’ve ever observed the phenomena.

But yeah, his concern with labels is almost as confusing.

Seems like he’d be bi-sexual. There seems to be great reluctance on the part of both men and women to recognize bi-sexual as a legitimate orientation. There’s been some sociological and psychological research on the topic, but this is the first time I’ve ever observed the phenomena.

But yeah, his concern with labels is almost as confusing. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

Correct me if I'm wrong, but most men would call any guy wanting to suck on cock gay, if it's a woman wanting both genders, we call that hot! Life isn't fair but that's how things are

Correct me if I'm wrong, but most men would call any guy wanting to suck on cock gay, if it's a woman wanting both genders, we call that hot! Life isn't fair but that's how things are Originally Posted by BLM69

To further expound, it's only HOT if the girls involved are hot. If one or both are butch it's 'ewww'.

Even that depends, too. If she's butch, but not waaaay over butch, just maybe a little...tippee toeing the line a bit, but still kinda cute, that's ok, and we can work with that. If the 'top' in that situation is the above, and looks good 'handling' her "bitch", but not too over the top that you have to feel sorry for her, that's not bad, either.

I dont believe in labels but yes I do fantasize about sucking guys off. Specifically older ,powerful dudes, but I think that's called daddy issues lol.

All jokes aside, I dont think the OP is gay. Nothing wrong with a little sexual curiosity? Damn.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but most men would call any guy wanting to suck on cock gay, if it's a woman wanting both genders, we call that hot! Life isn't fair but that's how things are Originally Posted by BLM69

^^^^^

Another interesting phenomena is that 96% of the women in the swing lifestyle admit to being bi or bi-curious. Yet, only 4% in the real/vanilla world admit to being bi/bi-curious. The same thing probably applies to men. Most guys are "HELL NO" in the vanilla world, yet I've had MANY confessions from hobbyist friends.

Just own it....

These stats are pulled out of my arse....but you get the point.

Um. That's the textbook definition of gay. Don't worry about breaking the news to your folks. They already know.

I dont believe in labels but yes I do fantasize about sucking guys off. Specifically older ,powerful dudes, but I think that's called daddy issues lol.

All jokes aside, I dont think the OP is gay. Nothing wrong with a little sexual curiosity? Damn. Originally Posted by Meet_Nicole

Damn, do I have to be older for you to call me daddy?

Wow. Some of the replies here indicate to me near total ignorance. Gay is not a binary issue. It is a matter of degrees. In addition, just because someone gets turned on by being coerced into sucking cock in a cuckold scene, does not make them a lover of men aka gay. I knew a girl that was insanely turned on watching a man giving oral to another man. What she did about it is another story.

There are degrees to gay/straight/bi as well. Same with anything. If you are in love with a man or only have sex with men, then I would say that person is gay. Any sex that involves a MMF, then I would say they are likely bi to some degree.

A single fantasy or MMF encounter does not mean a person is gay.

Some of you guys sound like if someone perform a certain act that somehow that converts them from straight to gay. Nothing could be further from the truth. Conversion is impossible. It is how your brain is wired that determines how you swing so to speak..

Here is some food for thought. Anal sex isn't something that only gays do. Some straight guys like pegging. Pegging doesn't mean they are gay either. A guy who enjoys a good pegging has discovered what gay men have been doing for centuries. Why should the gay men be the only ones to enjoy that form of sex?

You can't convert someone. There is nothing that a person does that somehow changes them from straight to bi to gay. To suggest otherwise is either pure ignorance or stupidity.

In answer to the OP, it might be easier to find a femdom cuckold in chastity scene. The cuckold would have to prove he is willing to do whatever she wants so that she gets maximum pleasure. Look up fucklicking.

ricky

Kendrasretreat has a guy for exactly that purpose. His name is Alejandro.

But yeah, his concern with labels is almost as confusing. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

If it's brown & floating in a toilet, it's shit.

If a dude wants to blow another dude, that's gay.

I'm not sure why anyone has issues with matters of facts.

If it's brown & floating in a toilet, it's shit.

If a dude wants to blow another dude, that's gay.

I'm not sure why anyone has issues with matters of facts. Originally Posted by grean

They want fool themselves that they're straight, next they'll be saying that cock in a man's ass is not gay, just call things what they are and keep it moving.