HOLY SMOKES! The New York Times just quietly DEBUNKED the Washington Post claim that Pete Hegseth or Admiral Bradley are ‘war criminals’ by ordering the killing of terrorists after the initial strike
Turns out Hegseth did NOT give any further orders — and the target remained lawful because more terrorists might’ve gone and retrieved the boat.
SUE WAPO!!!
- bambino
- Yesterday, 06:35 PM
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 06:49 PM
BREAKING - Pete Hegseth and Admiral Bradley are now being encouraged to pursue defamation charges against the Washington Post after the NYT revealed it blatantly lied about them ordering survivors to be killed, pushing Democrats to slander them as committing “war crimes.”
https://x.com/rightanglenews/status/...541887371?s=42 Originally Posted by bambino
HOLY SMOKES! The New York Times just quietly DEBUNKED the Washington Post claim that Pete Hegseth or Admiral Bradley are ‘war criminals’ by ordering the killing of terrorists after the initial strike
Turns out Hegseth did NOT give any further orders — and the target remained lawful because more terrorists might’ve gone and retrieved the boat.
SUE WAPO!!! Originally Posted by bambino
What does any of this nonsense have to do with the thread's topic?