yeah, just do it Originally Posted by waverunner234stick it up your arse
You made the point. If a school teacher with a CHL and a pistol "has a chance" ...You are assuming that the teacher has an option to run or fight. Of course the swat team would be the best option but having a gun gives him a much better chance of survival than throwing erasers at the lunatic. There is not one simple solution. A combination of many of the ideas posted here would be best.
... a 10-year veteran body armoured police officer with instinctive shooting training with tactical entry experience and training placed inside the school with a back up officer around the corner in the hall with full communication with approaching back up officers has a ...
.. much better chance of surviving AND nuetralizing the shooter faster.
So why use a teacher? Save money?
Or give free training to want-a-be's?
Or ....Is it because you think you can do it if a teacher can? Originally Posted by LexusLover
You made the point. If a school teacher with a CHL and a pistol "has a chance" ...You are right but why don't we just assign a couple of special forces personnel to each school. If a cop that rarely gets in combat situations is better than a teacher that would most likely never get in a combat situation then a special forces soldier would be great. Since reality is not a limitation we can make all schools like Fort Knox and surround them with troops. The kids will never be at risk.
... a 10-year veteran body armoured police officer with instinctive shooting training with tactical entry experience and training placed inside the school with a back up officer around the corner in the hall with full communication with approaching back up officers has a ...
.. much better chance of surviving AND nuetralizing the shooter faster. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Umm.....NO!And you know this how? Do you have a hotline to the afterlife? You can disagree with anyone on here but you can't put words in the mouths of those killed.
If those six brave women could speak from the grave they would be against arming teachers or having armed guards in their school. . Originally Posted by SweetKimberly
Umm.....NO!You lying ignorant bitch. That is not what he said and you know it. Nobody here has said that a good guy with a gun is guaranteed to be the victor in a confrontation with a bad guy. What is being said is if the good guy has a gun he has a better chance of survival than if he doesn't. Why do you insist on making shit up to support your left leaning ideas?
Wayne LaPierre gave a press conference today that would have made Archie Bunker proud. His logic is convoluted. Earlier today in Pennsylvania two ARMED state troopers were shot. According to LaPierre any "good guy" who is armed is EXEMPT from any harm simply because they are armed. So can someone please explain to me how these troopers were wounded? Did they fall down? Did vehicle glass explode inside their bodies? As I watched Mr. LaPierre give his press conference today I felt sad and disappointed as an American. With a straight face he stood there as his words slapped the face of twenty sets of parents who lost their children on Friday. He might as well have been wearing fatigues as he rallied for gun sales. Oh...I mean as he rallied for the "National School Shield".
BTW there was an armed uniformed resource officer on duty at Columbine. His name is Deputy Neil Gardner who was a 15 year veteran of the local sheriff's office at the time. He was a good guy with a gun. Why didn't he get the bad guys with a gun?
Please do not live your lives in fear. You can't fight violence with violence. Life is a beautiful gift...please try to enjoy it. Originally Posted by SweetKimberly
Two armed police with body armor walked up to a car in Topeka ,Ks on a call.They were both shot in the head before they could pull their guns.. Originally Posted by i'va biggenAnother example of why not to arm teachers .... and