They found no massive fraud...
Originally Posted by WTF
I remember them finding a # of areas where they had hundreds more votes REGISTERED as being cast, then they found ballots in the boxes. BUT NOTHING after that.
So of course no 'mass fraud will be found' if they simply STOPPED investigating..
Because , it shortens the lines for others who wait for the last minute to vote....does your dumbass want to limit the sale of Christmas gifts to Dec 24th? Do you understand what a mess that would be? Huge crowds for the elderly are actually dangerous for them. Come on man , think.
Originally Posted by WTF
You are the dumb one likening xmas shopping to voting.
That just means they were a good prisoner and severed their debt under the rules. Jesus, this is not Rocket science. You go to prison for 10 years, you get out in 7 for good behavior, you served your time under the rules and you get to vote.
Originally Posted by WTF
OR they got let out cause of the common mantra "Over crowding"..
Damn a fake ID ....bunch of kids that want to get into a club or not going to be able to vote for 10 years. Fake ID are not used to vote.....you realize that right?
Originally Posted by WTF
If they are not investigating, HOW THE HELL can you claim with absolute certainty, no one is using fake ids to vote?
My solution is not VOTER SUPPRESSION.
Jesus , is you owned a business and 31 people over the years stole from you, would you set up a system to punish 500k that did not? That is basically wtf these laws do. It is an excuse to get back to Jim Crow laws. which many of you think , MAGA.
Originally Posted by WTF
I worked as a security guard in several shops, who's role was to keep tabs on customers, JUST CAUSE OF THAT< and yes many 'non-thieving' customers DID feel they were being wronged cause i had to (By the rules of our contract) periodically walk the store, and WATCH people, especially if the employees asked me to keep an eye on So-and-so.
PLUS you ever notice our prices are HIGHER in a # of stores, JSUT TO COVER THEM for the losses they do get from thieves.
SO WE ARE ALL GETTING punished for those who steal.
We should have a goal as a Nation to have 80-90% participation .
Originally Posted by WTF
While that's commendable, HOW exactly will you ensure only those LEGALLY AUTHORIZED to vote, do so, without getting fraud? YOU have still not answered the bloody question
It's hard to say having armed individuals is absolutely wrong, given the current climate.
If just one person returned fire, the guy may have fled before killing all those people...and babies. The bastard went pew by pew killing babies.
Is it needed? I don't know. Saying it's a dumb idea completely is, well...dumb.
Originally Posted by grean
And that is why i feel you SHOULD BE armed, to defend yourself.. NOTICE< EVERYONE of these mass shootings have been done in gun free zones.. EVEN THE ONE on fort hood.
Having the wind force reporting his bad discharge to the FBI would not have kept him from having firearms. It would have just kept him from buying them legal. There are still gun shows, and peer to peer selling.
Originally Posted by bamscram
True, it wouldn't stop him getting a gun peer-to-peer, but it WOULD at gun shows.. I know as i asked over a DOZEN booths last gun show we had here in Columbus, and not a ONE SAID they sell without doing the same as the stores (backround check, waiting period etc)..