crap, CC stated I be non conformist or something like that.I'm thincking that Somebody is about ready to start issuing infractions for non compliance.
Originally Posted by Paulwantsya
sir
Here are the facts, when you and everyone else joined this site, you had to click that little button saying that you agreed to follow the rules of the site. And obviously you did or you wouldn't be here now. You knew these rules at that point, up front, before you ever made you first post on this website. So if there is now a problem with you following them. If you cannot or don't want to play by the rules anymore, just let me know. There are always alternatives. No one is trying to be difficult and stifle discussion, but thats the way it is on this topic, take it or leave it. Originally Posted by Chica ChaserOh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?
Oh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?
I'm all for a zero tolerance policy with respect to discussions involving illegal substances - to the extent that i've always found it absurd allowing people to use the "PT" end-around. But there's nothing in the TOS with respect to either conversations involving illegal substances, or following the rules of the site beyond what's laid out in the TOS.
Either read the damn thing, or stop telling people they agreed to something they didn't agree to when they clicked the box. Originally Posted by Doove
The Web Site is protected by copyright as a collective work and/or compilation, pursuant to U.S. copyright laws, international conventions, and other copyright laws. The contents of the Web Site are only for your personal, non-commercial use. All materials contained on the Web Site are protected by copyright, and are owned or controlled by Company.You will abide by any and all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any Content on the Web Site. Copying or storing of any Content for other than personal, noncommercial use is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission from Company.
Not my job either( excuse #1 in the mod rolodex of excuses). Of the 900 people who viewed that thread nobody else bothered to RTM either. I think that speaks volumes about the concern for the policy by members. Given how important the policy seems to be to the powers that be, such lax monitoring makes the policy a joke. If a provider is a raging alcoholic, that's one of the things I'd want to know to base my decision on whether to see her or not. This policy is a disservice to members and potentially puts them at considerably more risk than if a provider was an alcoholic. Do you find it acceptable that there are different standards of enforcement depending on the Mod or region? Originally Posted by drluv1^ this guy :-)
I disagree with Chica about mentioning that a provider is an alcoholic. Alcoholism is a medical condition, and for me, that falls into medical speculation about a member. Talking about her drinking, or being drunk, is fine, saying she's an alcoholic, isn't, and that's how I'd enforce it. Just me though.As you know, its a fine interpretation line
There is certainly different enforcement of certain guidelines in different forums, because some guidelines are open to interpretation. Some are not, and if there is differing enforcement of those guidelines, then the owners and admins put a stop to it...as you are seeing in these forums...
Have fun with that... Originally Posted by Wakeup
btw: you seeing less of this topic going on? Just ask ya CC Originally Posted by offshoredrillingYou can see it just as well as I can, and can answer your own question
Oh brother. Do we really need to have this discussion again?
I'm all for a zero tolerance policy with respect to discussions involving illegal substances - to the extent that i've always found it absurd allowing people to use the "PT" end-around. But there's nothing in the TOS with respect to either conversations involving illegal substances, or following the rules of the site beyond what's laid out in the TOS.
Either read the damn thing, or stop telling people they agreed to something they didn't agree to when they clicked the box. Originally Posted by Doove
If I were a lawyer, I would tell you "restrictions and content" includes the guidelines..........but, I'm not a lawyer........So, I'll let you figure that out for yourself. Originally Posted by dearhunterAh Doove......sigh. I fear you just refuse to get it. That's cool though, its your choice.
I disagree with Chica about mentioning that a provider is an alcoholic. Alcoholism is a medical condition, and for me, that falls into medical speculation about a member. Talking about her drinking, or being drunk, is fine, saying she's an alcoholic, isn't, and that's how I'd enforce it. Originally Posted by Wakeup
As you know, its a fine interpretation line. Originally Posted by Chica ChaserEureka....there is light at the end of the tunnel!....
Eureka....there is light at the end of the tunnel!....
It appears this is the best way to warn others of problems encountered during a risky date.
Just say the SP was drinking and stumbled about drunk, to cover both drinking, along with any Rule 15 shit!.....
dang, where is my rock collection. One seems to be missing
If I were a lawyer, I would tell you "restrictions and content" includes the guidelines Originally Posted by dearhunterThe entire clause is about copyrights.....except for one-half of one sentence right in the middle of it. If you say so.
but, I'm not a lawyerClearly.
Ah Doove......sigh. I fear you just refuse to get it. That's cool though, its your choice. Originally Posted by Chica ChaserNo, Ccamouflage, what i refuse to do is accept something just because you say so. That went out the window back with your little power play back in August.
The entire clause is about copyrights.....except for one-half of one sentence right in the middle of it. If you say so.heh
Clearly.
No, Ccamouflage, what i refuse to do is accept something just because you say so. That went out the window back with your little power play back in August. Originally Posted by Doove
