Traveling Gentleman is............

Fancyinheels's Avatar
Sorry Fancy, ya got it wrong. If a provider puts a no review policy in force with us, then they are not allowed to advertise on here. We would pull any ads.

Also, any reviews of her would be removed.

Something else I am forgetting, but I am sure Spice will be along shortly. Originally Posted by Pistolero
Oh, wow, that's new to me! When did this take effect? (I know ladies with, let's say, "unofficial" no-review policies. I guess they just "highly discourage" them.) Hmm, that explains why some providers have dropped off ECCIE and gone UTR.

This does preserve the integrity of the system. However, where is this stated in the provider advertising guidelines, please? I've never seen it and can't find it.

I stand corrected. Duh. My apologies!
kinkyorca's Avatar
Its ok my bounty lass, a few shots if whiskey and it will be all better....
Fancyinheels's Avatar
Its ok my bounty lass, a few shots if whiskey and it will be all better.... Originally Posted by kinkyorca

5T3V3's Avatar
  • 5T3V3
  • 06-18-2015, 12:45 PM
Sorry Fancy, ya got it wrong. If a provider puts a no review policy in force with us, then they are not allowed to advertise on here. We would pull any ads.

Also, any reviews of her would be removed.

Something else I am forgetting, but I am sure Spice will be along shortly. Originally Posted by Pistolero
I would assume either a lady starts with that policy or as a result of several bad reviews wishes to go to the no review policy - just curious if at a later time she were to reverse her policy choice would the old negative reviews be posted? Also, if we write a review of a lady that has a no review policy and we are unaware of that what happens as far as credit and is it just posted but not visible pending a potential change of policy? just curious.
SpiceItUp's Avatar
Sorry Fancy, ya got it wrong. If a provider puts a no review policy in force with us, then they are not allowed to advertise on here. We would pull any ads.

Also, any reviews of her would be removed.

Something else I am forgetting, but I am sure Spice will be along shortly. Originally Posted by Pistolero
Yeah basically this, except in order for a provider to have an enforceable no-review policy she cannot advertise ANYWHERE on the Internet not just Eccie. If it is determined that the girl still has, for instance, a p411 or TER account the policy is null and void.

Also, in case Pete was unclear, if a provider goes UTR and requests a no review policy it is only enforced from that time forward her prior reviews are not removed.




Oh, wow, that's new to me! When did this take effect? (I know ladies with, let's say, "unofficial" no-review policies. I guess they just "highly discourage" them.) Hmm, that explains why some providers have dropped off ECCIE and gone UTR.

This does preserve the integrity of the system. However, where is this stated in the provider advertising guidelines, please? I've never seen it and can't find it.

I stand corrected. Duh. My apologies!
Originally Posted by Fancyinheels
It is clearly stated in the Forum Guidelines. #29 specifically. The portion regarding advertising anywhere not just Eccie has been a further clarification to the policy.


#29 - Verified Providers who use the Showcase feature or advertise in our forums are not entitled to a no-review policy. Should circumstances arise which require or prompt you to request a no-review policy on ECCIE, please understand that enforcement of this policy also results in revoking of your showcase or ad-posting privileges. Ladies who have chosen a no-review policy on ECCIE may still post and create threads in any of the non-advertising forums on the board and will still have access to the girls-only areas of the board..




I would assume either a lady starts with that policy or as a result of several bad reviews wishes to go to the no review policy - just curious if at a later time she were to reverse her policy choice would the old negative reviews be posted? Also, if we write a review of a lady that has a no review policy and we are unaware of that what happens as far as credit and is it just posted but not visible pending a potential change of policy? just curious. Originally Posted by 5T3V3
As I stated above, a provider's prior reviews are not removed once she removes her showcase and all ads from the Internet and requests a no review policy. Only the reviews made from that point forward are subject to the policy. This makes the scenario you describe impossible where she goes UTR to flee or remove negative reviews.

In answer to your second question, if someone writes a review of a provider with a no-review policy we simply remove the review from view and inform the poster as to why. No harm no foul. Premium credit is still given for the review as well.

Members are not expected to maintain some kind of list in their head of who can and can't be reviewed except when it comes to reviewing Licenesed Massage Therapists where they should know better.
SpiceItUp's Avatar
Oh I'd also like to mention that there are ZERO independent providers in Houston who have an enforceable No-Review policy at this time.

There are plenty who say they 'don't allow' reviews but ultimately the decision is up to the individual client.
Oh I'd also like to mention that there are ZERO independent providers in Houston who have an enforceable No-Review policy at this time.

There are plenty who say they 'don't allow' reviews but ultimately the decision is up to the individual client.
Originally Posted by SpiceItUp


Interesting, indeed.

Wonder how it is some of these ladies carry that out
being that 90% of them on ECCIE DO indeed have P411, etc.......
(Curiousity.... not for my own purposes of course, I think reviews are a necessary evil, as a business person/provider.
Good to know though...)
Thanks for clarifying.
LexusLover's Avatar
[COLOR="Red"][I]Yeah basically this, except in order for a provider to have an enforceable no-review policy she cannot advertise ANYWHERE on the Internet not just Eccie. If it is determined that the girl still has, for instance, a p411 or TER account the policy is null and void. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
Why isn't the "ANYWHERE" clarification not written into the rules?
oilfieldscum's Avatar
Of course she'll bitch about it, do the RTM and everything else. However when she does this, I will RTM every post she's made where she flames somebody. I guarantee you that she's flamed the hell out of other members here in many different threads. We can play this game all night.

Actually the only thing I posted until her and her buddy tg posted, is that I stated the tg is her white knight. Originally Posted by NOBODY60
I dunno she seems like she has some balls to me. I would doubt she hits the RTM very often but you never really know. Speaking of balls what was your previous/other handle? Was/is it a provider handle?

And if you want to know if you're a cyber stalker or not go back and look at your 71 posts on this SHMB and see how many of them are about a particular member.
SpiceItUp's Avatar
Why isn't the "ANYWHERE" clarification not written into the rules? Originally Posted by LexusLover
Good question, for which I have no good answer. Above my pay grade.
SpiceItUp's Avatar

Interesting, indeed.

Wonder how it is some of these ladies carry that out
being that 90% of them on ECCIE DO indeed have P411, etc....... Originally Posted by FoxyNC
Easy, most people don't know the rules so when a girl tells them they're not allowed to write a review or that she has a no review policy they don't question it any further than that.

All I am saying is that claiming you have one doesn't make it so.
Lexieinhouston's Avatar

Interesting, indeed.

Wonder how it is some of these ladies carry that out
being that 90% of them on ECCIE DO indeed have P411, etc.......
(Curiousity.... not for my own purposes of course, I think reviews are a necessary evil, as a business person/provider.
Good to know though...)
Thanks for clarifying.
Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Ladies achieve this because first of all, there are a large number of gentlemen who never write reviews. Also, a large number who will respect your wishes if you don't wish to be reviewed and discourage it, but still advertise. Most guys are gentlemen about it.



~
Pistolero's Avatar
Thanks Spice. I knew there was more, but my old brain could not think of it. The advertise anywhere was what I could not remember. Knew there was more.

That and the no showcase if we have set up a no review for a provider.
#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive you can't write *anything* according to this rule,,, this includes a review or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.

Read the RED writing in above rules,,,
SpiceItUp's Avatar
#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive you can't write *anything* according to this rule,,, this includes a review or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.

Read the RED writing in above rules,,, Originally Posted by Lorde
Yup, exactly, which is why this rule is interpreted in an EXTREMELY narrow fashion site wide. If applied broadly it would, as you point out, be very easy to claim it too easily.