...Pass the Mississippi law 6-3 and take away this argument from the mid-terms, plus IMHO, it would be more in line with the duty of the court to deal with the case in front of them, not expand the ruling beyond what the case presents. Originally Posted by HedonistForeverSo I was confused at first about this case. Some I saw reporting as 6-3, others reported 5-4. Turns out both are correct. (There are more links in the source article)
Supreme Court Reverses Roe, Overturns Constitutional Right to Abortion and Returns Abortion Law to the States
The 213-page Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs -v- Jackson (Mississippi case) is FOUND HERE. The ruling in the Dobbs case was 6-3 in favor of allowing Mississippi to place limits on abortion after 15 weeks. However, in combination with the Dobbs decision the court has overturned (by a 5-4 vote) the 1972 Roe -vs- Wade decision that created a constitutional right to abortion.
Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the majority on the Dobbs decision (Mississippi) but said he did not agree with the decision to overturn Roe. The vote to overturn Roe was 5-4. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion.
Due to an unprecedented leak in the Alito draft opinion in May, the Roe decision was anticipated. The leaked draft opinion showed that a majority of the justices were privately poised to remove a constitutional right for abortion; today that step was taken.
SCOTUS BLOG – […] Alito began his 79-page opinion by observing that abortion “presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views.” But the Constitution does not refer to abortion at all, Alito stressed, and nothing in the Constitution implicitly protects the right to an abortion.Abortion rights activists and politicians have been preparing for this moment for two months. Immediately after the decision to overturn Roe was released all of the far-left activists, media stenographers and politicians began reacting.
Although the Supreme Court’s decisions in Roe and Casey established such a right, Alito continued, those decisions should nonetheless be overruled despite the principle of stare decisis – the idea that courts should not overturn their prior precedent unless there is a compelling reason to do so. Noting that some of the Supreme Court’s other landmark decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education, rejecting the “separate but equal” doctrine, had overruled precedent, Alito emphasized that Roe was “egregiously wrong and deeply damaging” and – along with Casey – should not be allowed to stand. Instead, Alito concluded, the issue of abortion should “return … to the people’s representatives.” (read more)
This supreme court ruling will lead several news cycles and opposing it will form the cornerstone of the 2022 Democrat mid-term election campaign in every state. The media have been polling this abortion issue since the draft leak in early May.
CNN did an extensive poll on the abortion issue of young people voting – [pdf here]
CTH pulled all the poll data into one easier to read infographic of the responses by age (below). The 18-to-34-year group are not single-issue voters.
31% of that age group say a candidate MUST agree with them on abortion, while 69% say abortion is only one of several factors or not much of a factor.
The 18–34-year group is also reasonably pragmatic. If Roe v Wade overturned, 21% say abortions likely to be banned where they live; 31% say likely harder but not banned; 26% say it wouldn’t make a difference; and 22% not sure what would happen where they live.
Not a problem for me, I just never figured I'd be looking to get snipped at my age. But it's easy and cheap. Did I hit a nerve with you, apologize if so. Thanks and have a great day! Originally Posted by 69in2it69Not in the least... but if you don't have sense enough to use a condom, well you deserve whatever happens....
Not in the least... but if you don't have sense enough to use a condom, well you deserve whatever happens.... Originally Posted by texassapper
It all can be boiled down to enumerated rights and unspecified rights.Except i1n1 3 years with a Republican the SC will be upholding a1 1National ban on abortion.
Enumerated rights such as free speech and protections against self-incrimination have been laid out explicitly with just a few words in the Bill of Rights.
Rights not explicitly spelled out in the Constitution are reserved to the States in the 9th Amendment or to the people in the 10th Amendment.
Now the people in every state can determine what is what regarding abortion. Originally Posted by ICU 812
It all can be boiled down to enumerated rights and unspecified rights.
Enumerated rights such as free speech and protections against self-incrimination have been laid out explicitly with just a few words in the Bill of Rights.
Rights not explicitly spelled out in the Constitution are reserved to the States in the 9th Amendment or to the people in the 10th Amendment.
Now the people in every state can determine what is what regarding abortion. Originally Posted by ICU 812